Johnson told ‘you shouldn’t have bullies in government’ amid Patel criticism

The Canary

Boris Johnson was facing allegations he tried to water down the official inquiry that found home secretary Priti Patel bullied staff as he was told “you shouldn’t have bullies in government” by a former top civil servant.

Sir David Normington, a former Home Office permanent secretary, said on Saturday the prime minister:

doesn’t seem willing to stand up for high standards in public life

as he faced mounting criticism for standing by Ms Patel.

Downing Street did not deny suggestions that Mr Johnson had tried and failed to convince his standards ministerial adviser Sir Alex Allan to tone down his conclusion that her behaviour amounted to bullying as he found instances of shouting and swearing.

The adviser quit on Friday when the prime minister overruled his conclusion that Ms Patel breached the ministerial code and stood by his home secretary.

Sir David, the top civil servant at the department until 2011, criticised Mr Johnson for contradicting Sir Alex to find the cabinet minister is not a bully.

“The Prime Minister has simply put aside the findings of a report, and of the independent adviser Sir Alex Allan, that she is a bully and you shouldn’t’ have bullies in government,” Sir David told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.

We have to put ourselves in the position of the bullied, no one has spoken up for them, some of them are junior staff and who will be sitting there today thinking that their voice has not been heard and you cannot rely on the Prime Minister to stand up for them.

“For the first time as far as I can remember we have a prime minister that doesn’t seem willing to stand up for high standards in public life.

Conservative peer Ken Clarke, a former home secretary, said he was “troubled” by the “very awkward situation”. Lord Clarke told Times Radio:

It was assumed before that if an investigation was taken this far and if anyone was found to have broken the ministerial code, I don’t think anyone would have doubted the minister – to use the old phrase – would have to consider his or her position,

Offering what she described as an “unreserved, fulsome apology”, Ms Patel seized on Sir Alex’s finding that she received no feedback on the impact of her behaviour.

But Sir Philip Rutnam, who quit as the Home Office’s permanent secretary after accusing Ms Patel of a “vicious and orchestrated briefing campaign” against him, contested this.

He said she was advised not to shout and swear at staff the month after her appointment in 2019 and that he told her to treat staff with respect “on a number of further occasions”.

Sir Philip also said he was not interviewed for the inquiry despite him having launched a constructive dismissal claim at an employment tribunal.

Meanwhile, the Times reported two unnamed senior Whitehall officials saying that the prime minister tried and failed to get Sir Alex to tone down his report to find there was no clear evidence of bullying.

Sir Alex Allan
Sir Alex Allan has resigned as Boris Johnson’s adviser on ministerial standards (PA)

Downing Street did not deny the report, with a No 10 spokesman instead saying: “As you would expect, the prime minister spoke to Sir Alex Allan to further his understanding of the report.

“Sir Alex’s conclusions are entirely his own.”

Shadow home office minister Holly Lynch said the “initial, unedited report” must be published in full and called for an independent investigation.

“These are serious allegations that suggest Boris Johnson tried to interfere with an investigation into bullying accusations against one of his closest political allies,” the Labour MP said.

Sir Alex found Ms Patel had not always treated civil servants with “consideration and respect” and concluded that her approach on occasions “amounted to behaviour that can be described as bullying in terms of the impact felt by individuals”.

He said Ms Patel had “not consistently met the high standards required by the ministerial code”, though he said there was “no evidence that she was aware of the impact of her behaviour”.

The home secretary apologised and said there were “no excuses” for what happened but highlighted Sir Alex’s assessment of her awareness.

She told the BBC that “any upset that I’ve caused is completely unintentional and at the time, of course it says it’s in the report, that issues were not pointed out to me”.

The chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, Lord Evans of Weardale, said Sir Alex’s resignation was “deeply concerning” and that his committee would look “urgently” at what had happened as part of its review of the ministerial code.

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. Could these clowns possibly be any more insulting? As if Cummings and his condescending eyesight testing bullshit wasn’t bad enough, now we’ve got this callous cow getting away with being a horrible PTSD inducing bullying bitch because her victims, who not only had to put up with constant abuse but also the fear of ending up jobless in Tory Britain, hadn’t made her aware that she was being a horrible PTSD inducing bullying bitch. So basically, she’s innocent, her victims are guilty and we’re too stupid to see through the bullshit?

      If this shitty little joke of an island was put in its place by a tsunami, it would only be missed by the people who enjoyed laughing at it.

    2. After Patel’s unofficial visit to Israel (which she’d initially denied – what was she up to there?) under May’s watch, at least she was made to resign. Beggars belief that Bojo would then bring her back.
      I think it was also Alan Duncan who said – when asked who he thought was unsuitable for any gov’t position – that one would be her.
      Ghastly person – I wouldn’t trust her with anything.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.