Since the formation of Your Party’s central executive committee, there has been growing frustration from members across the country.
Despite the desperate need for unity, solidarity and compassion in British society, the reported behaviour of the CEC has been to silence or intimidate socialist voices into compliance.
Members are feeling increasingly concerned that Your Party will not work to empower them or listen to their communities. Instead, branches are left ignored without access to resources or guidance which has seen local members abandon the party all together in disappointment.
Several groups have come together to pressure the executive committee to change course, organising to strengthen and assert the socialist voice within the fledgling party.
Your Party’s Muslim members speak out
One group to emerge is the Muslim Socialists of Your Party. They formed in response to growing concern that some were using social conservatism as a cover to sideline the trans community. The group has powerfully called out how some use the Muslim community as a shield to justify holding back progressive LGBTQIA+ policies.
This dynamic has cast a particularly ugly shadow over the run-up to Your Party’s conference, with figures aligned with Corbyn and the many making apparent transphobic remarks. A party built on community and solidarity must stand firmly against the oppression of every group, including our trans brothers and sisters. We cannot leave anyone out in the cold.
The Green Party’s recent success reinforces this point, showing that pro-trans policies resonate with Muslim voters and don’t pose the barrier some claim.
When campaigns focus on people’s real concerns and lead with fairness and solidarity, communities respond. It’s a reminder that inclusive, hopeful organising can build trust and support without division.@jeremycorbyn @zarahsultana @ZackPolanski pic.twitter.com/DJGMj999jd
— Muslim Socialists of Your Party (@MusSocialistsYP) February 27, 2026
Intersectional Feminists for Your Party
The Intersectional Feminists (IFEM) of Your Party has also contacted the CEC to request an explanation for its choice to remove the following from its membership officer role description:
diverse communities, including BAME groups and underrepresented members, to ensure inclusive participation activities.
The group sent an email on 18 March, the evening before the agenda was to be sent out ahead of the CEC meeting, held on 22 March. However, they have yet to receive a response to the serious concerns raised.
In a later post on X, IFEM asked for Your Party members’ support in ensuring it’s an inclusive party, truly built in the spirit of inclusion and solidarity.
We believe that intersectionality includes working on including underrepresented communities including global majority – not 'BAME'.
Agree with us? Email the letter below to [email protected] & [email protected]https://t.co/8fTQiJWaha pic.twitter.com/UgtH8Du2A4
— I.FEM.YOUR.PARTY (@I_FEM_YP) March 19, 2026
Young people are disappointed and ashamed
Younger members have also come together in Cambridge, forming an alliance to ensure young people are represented in Your Party. In an open letter, Your Party Youth Cambridge (YPYC) said the committee’s response “will determine whether we remain committed to Your Party”.
As experienced organisers, we will continue the struggle regardless, the only question is whether it’s under this Party’s banner or that of the Greens.
Speaking of their own graft at grassroots level to lay the groundwork for a new Socialist party of the people, the statement explained how YPYC began organising in November 2025. Its goal was to “support their local communities and combat the rise of the far-right”.
Since then, we’ve run a weekly food drive, now in its 16th iteration, ran an independent candidate for the CEC, supported strike action, and hosted numerous vibrant politicised cultural and educational events.
Over these past five months, our membership and impact in our community has greatly enriched our lives; we’ve become a steadfast and regular presence in our local streets. We were eagerly anticipating the formation of the CEC as a chance to concretise the promise of the Party and formally establish the structures we’d built.
However, the group claimed it’s “running out of steam” as it described the deep disappointment felt within communities who had jumped into action at the announcement of a new socialist party. The statement called out a “lack of progress towards branch formation” and how the group feels “increasingly ashamed to bear the Party’s name”.
We’ve felt incredibly disappointed with the lack of action, communication, and comradeship from the CEC. When we read out the CEC reports in our weekly meetings, we find them increasingly uninspiring, a dead weight hanging in the air.
The pre-conference divisiveness has only worsened with the elections; we’ve seen no attempts to resolve this and move forward productively…
We tell our peers that things will get better but, as each month passes, feel increasingly ashamed to bear the Party’s name.
The request to the executive committee is pretty simple really: “clarity, productivity, and confidence in our leadership”.
Will Labour 3.0 crash and burn?
Groups sprang up across the country after Zarah Sultana and Jeremy Corbyn’s announcement last July. Since then energy and engagement on the ground are fading fast, as people fear that those in charge care far less about solidarity than the activists working tirelessly to unite communities on the ground.
Going further, it seems like Jeremy Corbyn and his allies are leaning toward comfortable positions to seemingly appear relevant to the wider electorate. Their comments on the trans community make this clear, and many have widely condemned them as transphobic. However, this undermines everyone who believed we were building the country’s first socialist party — one that serves all people and leads by example rather than continually giving way to right wing, privileged views.
Frustrated by leadership’s refusal to listen, members are redirecting their energy and resources into empowering their communities and peers. Nevertheless, this growing grassroots effort exposes a real and palpable fear: the party appears to sideline socialists, reducing them to little more than subscription payers, and lets unelected officials like Karie Murphy make all the rules.
That hardly reflects the collective leadership model approved at the November conference. So, we have to ask: now that Corbyn’s team holds full control, are they selling us out? If this party becomes no different from its predecessors, it will lose all relevance and will crash and burn.
If that’s the case, more and more socialist groups across the country must stand ready to step in and fill the void, and rebuild this movement from the bottom-up.
Featured image via the Canary













I now favour an open alignment with other proto branches. Asdoon as we can link up, I favour forming indepenpndent communiyy groups in each constituency, disaffiliating from Your Party, fielding our own candidates and holding our own inaugural conference at the end of the year.
“The Green Party’s recent success reinforces this point, showing that pro-trans policies resonate with Muslim voters and don’t pose the barrier some claim.”
Perhaps people (starting with the author of this piece) might like to look at a recent article published by The Green Light blog :
“As the 1600 members-strong Green Party Women’s Declaration has formally commenced legal proceedings against the Green Party of England and Wales (GPEW) for discrimination under the Equality Act 2010, newly recruited members may wish to take a closer look at the internal document which is central to their claim.
“How the ‘Guidance to Identify Queerphobia’ adopted by a show of hands by elected representatives serving on the Green Party Regional Council (GPRC) in 2023 ended up as part of the GPEW’s Code of Conduct should in itself have raised major concerns.This is because whilst it took three years of debate for Conference to finally agree to a definition of anti-semitism – Green activists used to take such matters seriously – this ‘Guidance’ was quietly added as an Appendix to the Code of conduct and the Disciplinary process without any debate, nor approval by Conference.
“In a leaked 53-pages internal dossier produced by the Party’s own lawyers, the ‘Guidance’ was flagged as carrying a serious risk that it unlawfully discriminated against members with gender-critical beliefs. This ought to have been a warning to the Party’s Executive that to continue suspending or expelling members because of their view that sex is biologial and not to be confused with gender was against the Equality Act of 2010 and as confirmed by the Supreme Court in April 2025.”
The Green Light : Why the green partys definition of transphobia is illegal, 8 March 2026
https://thegreenlight.blog/2026/03/08/why-the-green-partys-definition-of-transphobia-is-illegal/
Perhaps The Canary might consider adressing this issue as well ?
Just for the record, on the subject of local groups, this from the Chair’s report on yesterday’s CEC meeting :
“One of the most significant areas of progress was on branch formation. The CEC
approved the direction of travel for creating a geographic branch structure, and a
wide-ranging consultation with members on the right boundaries for their areas. The
CEC elected Cath Davis and Sam Gorst to lead work on this area with Membership
Officer Cassi Bellingham.
Next steps will include:
● A member consultation process (including surveys and regional meetings)
● Engagement with regional CEC representatives om their areas;
● Further proposals on branch formation processes.
This is a vital part of building a truly member-led party rooted in communities.
We were candid about areas where we need to improve, particularly:
● Responding more quickly to member communications;
● Enabling use of the members’ portal to advertise local events;
● Improving coordination across teams.
Work is already underway to address these issues, including reviewing systems and
capacity issues.
This was a focused and constructive meeting where we balanced ambition with
realism. We are building a new party from the ground up—putting in place the
structures, processes, and culture needed for long-term success. “
The author of this article has already been exposed plotting to lie about Corbyn and his allies, in coordinated plans with Sultana aligned members. Details – https://open.substack.com/pub/skidrowradio/p/exposed-the-canary-lies-for?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=3cxn4u
Interesting – thanks for the link. Still too much monkey business going on in YP, but when you can identify the monkeys its a move in the right direction…
Thanks Red Star for a positive contribution amongst all the depressing speculation.
We just need branches setting up, member info given to them and some initial funding.
In my city are 8 constituencies (33 wards) so logical to start with Constituency Your Party branches then is up to them if want ward branches? For local elections could have a citywide working group to seek candidates & put a panel of candidates together which once agreed by a citywide vote goes to the constituencies for members to democratically choose from. This group could also ask members for policy ideas & a draft manifesto goes out to members to agree, amend, delete & add to & final manifesto policy by policy is voted on by all members & constituencies run campaigns.
Set constituency parties up and grassroots, bottom up power can then take over.
Solidarity & Positivity!
Yeah, I dont think there should be a ‘one size fits all’ approach. I live in a post-industrial area of small towns and a rather large and partly rural constituency.
In our case it would be better to have groups based on the towns rather than wards (as some wards may only have one or two members) with a constituency overview group (members drawn from town groups) for co-ordinating elections.
Hopefully we should all get the opportunity to feed in our ideas before long.
I am astounded at how negative you have been about YP from the beginning. Who do you think will benefit from your consistent attacks on YP. Can’t you report on the work members have done to build the branches; the successes of a 6,000 strong very democratic conference ; the work going on. To support local election candidates ; the ongoing support for protest against the Western warmongers; And much more. And still you just advertise every small disagreement you can find. There are some differences but there is also a lot of common ground. Start looking for it??? Then I might start reading you regularly again.