It was a foul race to the bottom at PMQs. Keir Starmer played right into Farage’s hands.
Given a recent poll had Nigel Farage’s Reform party ahead of Labour, it may not be wise for Keir Starmer to fuel the sentiment that Farage thrives off. But at Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs), Starmer stoked the issue of immigration in response to questioning from Tory leader Kemi Badenoch.
Race to the bottom at this week’s PMQs
Badenoch said:
Why [is] cutting immigration not a priority?
Starmer replied:
The previous government presided over record high levels of immigration. The figures just a few weeks ago. Nearly a million on net migration. That is unprecedented. A one nation experiment in open borders under the last government.
Net immigration for the year ending in June 2024 was 728,000. That’s 1.2m offset by 479,000 people emigrating. The 1.2m is mainly made up of people from outside the EU+ on study or work visas, particularly for health and social care. The statistics are defined by people coming to the UK for more than a year.
For students below degree level, people can stay for a maximum of two years and for degree level they can stay for up to five years. A university graduate visa is also available, which means they can remain for an additional two years (or three for PhD students).
To emigrate to the UK, one needs either a job offer, significant capital, education prospects, UK ancestry, family or humanitarian reasons. Additionally, UK employers usually must pay an ‘immigration skills charge’ for hiring abroad.
Research from Oxford University suggests that the idea that immigrant workers are undercutting jobs for those born in the UK is largely unfounded. That’s partly because every immigrant person that comes here creates additional demand for goods and services. So immigration also creates jobs. Although, one study has found that immigration can have a small impact on the wages of low skilled service workers.
But the way to address this is surely to enforce a rule whereby profits of large service chains must be reflected in the wages of workers, rather than scapegoating foreign-born people.
Setting the stage for Farage
The idea the UK is ‘full’ is also misguided. Only 5% of land is used for homes and gardens. That means all 67m of us live in a country where 95% of the land is used for other things. To be sure, 71% of UK land is used for agriculture. And no one’s saying we should develop all of it. But it’s not ‘full’.
The fact is that 64% of the UK believe immigration has had a positive or neutral impact on the country.
So, Starmer should not be using PMQs to lament it from a wholly negative perspective. That only hands power to Farage.
But then again, during the election the Labour Party leader pretty much gifted the Reform MP his seat. He pulled the campaign of the Labour candidate in Farage’s constituency: Jovan Owusu-Nepaul, a 27 year old Black man. This can only be explained through Starmer actually wanting to boost Farage in order to keep UK political discourse right-wing.
Starmer setting the stage for Farage, both in the election and at PMQs, is certainly concerning.
Featured image via Guardian News – YouTube
Comments 4
Leave a Reply
The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX
Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.
For guest posting, contact [email protected]
For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]
© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings
Every day in parliament shows that it is entirely the wrong way for 67 million people to organise themselves. What it shows is that it takes electoral government by ruling elite (representative democracy, an oxymoron) to toxify human life and create the appalling conditions under which so many of us live. Decontextialised decision-making (those making the decisions are not the same as those affected by them) by MPs, leads to regressive taxes, withdrawal of welfare (WFA, 2-child benefit cap), because it’s you who is affected, not them. And they clearly don’t get that maybe they have friends and family who are affected, which shows that power destroys all meaningful connection to others. As long as we collectively believe that voting away power is fine and dandy, we’ll be gradually destroyed by Westminster. I don’t know how to convince people of their folly, but the only route out of this shit show (climate change, global ecological collapse), is direct, self-governance, without a psychopathic, hierarchical centre. There are many models of shared decision-making (not voting, not referenda, but deliberative, consensus-building, non-coercive), and the mob (as poll after poll shows) is not to be feared, since it is you and me. It takes a hierarchy to create genocide, poverty, colonialism, Imperialism, and these are all an utter waste of time, energy and life. As long as Westminster lasts, the trajectory is an ever-tightening corporate stranglehold, and a total degradation of the truth and the living world. Hope does not reside there.
Being ruled by millionaires is not democratic, especially when they are allowed to take bribes (sorry; donations) from corporations that need to be listened to through lobbying.
This country is following America into deep CAPITALISM and that is not good for the people who work for a living!
To be ruled by Labour Friends of Israel is not democratic either.
The colonisation of Palestine is matched only by the colonisation of our political class.
Nor is a Prime Minister who, until recently, was a member of America’s Trilateral Commission – The International Political Arm of American Foreign Policy for running the World Order.
Prior to the general election, around 30 per cent of Labour MPs were Labour Friends of Israel.
Does anyone know the actual figure now ?
I watched PMQs and it was utterly disgusting. But, to be honest, it’s nothing new. By now we should all be able to see this for what it is – a distraction. Watching two grown ups acting like school children! How they don’t feel deeply humiliated by their childish behaviour beggars belief.