• Donate
  • Login
Friday, July 10, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

Residents in Thirsk up in arms over proposal for Europe’s biggest battery storage project

Labour at it again

The Canary by The Canary
24 February 2025
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
208 16
A A
0
Home UK News
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

Nearly 800 people have objected to an environment-wrecking battery energy storage park on green belt land near Thirsk, North Yorkshire.

The project forms part of the UK Labour Party’s drive to increase renewable energy storage capacity across the country.

However, the project in Thirsk has demonstrated that corporations can run roughshod over local communities and the environment in the process.

Thirsk battery storage: community oppose mega-project

Renewable energy company NatPower is seeking permission from North Yorkshire Council to build a 1GW Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) in Thirsk. It has applied to construct the project on a 173-acre greenspace just outside the town. The project would take up 58 acres of the site. This would make it the largest BESS site of its kind in Europe.

Notably, this would contribute to the Labour Party government’s goal to increase battery storage by a minimum of five-fold on today’s available capacity. Currently, the UK has 4.5GW of installed battery storage. In December, the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) published its plans to upscale this to between 23-27GW by 2030.

However, the local community has lodged widespread objections to it. With nearly 800 formal objections submitted, the community has made its opposition unambiguous. Residents of Thirsk and the surrounding countryside made clear that the massive industrial project is unwelcome in their rural community.

The North Yorkshire Council planning portal displays more than 567 public comments raising objections to the project. Alongside this, local campaigners have hand-delivered more 227 objections to the council directly.

In contrast to the overwhelming local opposition, the application received just four letters of support. Two of these came from non-local sources.

Furthermore, the consultation event conducted by NatPower in November only managed to attract 137 local residents. This raised concerns about the level of community engagement.

As the BBC previously reported, the North York Moors National Park Authority, the local parish council, and Thirsk Town Council have all separately made objections to the project.

Corporate interests over the community and nature

A local campaign group – Thirsk Against Battery Storage – sprung up to challenge the proposals. Comprised of local residents, the group has been instrumental in mobilising objections against the project.

Crucially, it now raises overwhelming number of objections to the project as evidence for the unity of the local community’s stance. The group suggests that local people rejected the project for prioritising corporate interests over the well-being of residents, walkers, and nature lovers.

Key concerns raised by objectors include:

  • Significant fire risk from lithium-ion batteries.
  • Damage to wildlife habitats and disruption to public footpaths.
  • The transformation of good agricultural land into an industrial site.
  • The risk of noise pollution and other environmental impacts.
  • The damage to the finest view in England from the nearby National Park.
  • The economic impact from the loss of tourism.

Spokesperson for the group Philip Martin said:

The numbers speak for themselves. Thirsk is a historic market town, surrounded by stunning countryside and a community that values its heritage and environment. This proposal is entirely inappropriate for our area, and we are thrilled that so many people have made their voices heard.

The public consultation on the proposals has now closed. With the weight of public opposition now firmly on record, all eyes are on local authorities as they consider the next steps in the planning process.

Local resident and shop owner Fiona Potter objected to the industrial-scale development bordering her community. She said:

This is our home. Developments of this scale belong in brown field, industrial areas of which there are plenty to meet national demand, not in cherished countryside. We urge the planning committee to listen to the community and reject this proposal outright.

Featured image supplied

Tags: biodiversity crisisEnvironmentLabour Partyrenewable energy
Share166Tweet104ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

Centrists are to blame for the far-right AfD surge in Germany – and the UK must learn from it

Next Post

DWP facing legal action over its failure to compensate millions of people

Next Post
The DWP is facing legal action over its failure to compensate WASPI Women

DWP facing legal action over its failure to compensate millions of people

Saddam Rajab murdered by the IDF

This is the face of 10-year-old Saddam Rajab. The IDF just murdered him.

Out & Wild

The Out & Wild Festival is back and set to break new ground

Empowering grassroots movements with mini PCs

Empowering grassroots movements with mini PCs

Ali Abunimah

Police knew Electronic Intifada journalist 'posed no threat whatsoever', but violently arrested him anyway

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Farage
Skwawkbox

Farage ‘routinely’ introduced criminal donor Cottrell as ‘chief of staff’

by Skwawkbox
9 July 2026
Israel
Global

Netanyahu says Israel will occupy Lebanon for as long as they ‘need’

by Joe Glenton
9 July 2026
Burnham
Analysis

Andy Burnham offers milquetoast sop to Palestine. Sadly for him we weren’t born yesterday

by Joe Glenton
9 July 2026
Burnham
Analysis

The next PM must act on the interim Timms Report and scrap the DWP’s PIP assessment system

by Grace
9 July 2026
FAI
Analysis

Irish football bosses continue Israel appeasement with vote to fulfil fixtures

by Robert Freeman
9 July 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart