• Donate
  • Login
Tuesday, June 16, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

Liverpool City centre is about to go full Big Brother

Antifabot by Antifabot
11 December 2025
in Analysis
Reading Time: 3 mins read
210 4
A A
1
Home UK Analysis
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

Liverpool city centre is about to become the latest testing ground for mass surveillance.

On Monday 15 December, Merseyside Police will roll out facial recognition technology. This move will transform the city into a digital checkpoint. This racially biased technology poses a dangerous risk. It affects anyone who isn’t white or isn’t willing to tow the line. Meanwhile, Starmer intensifies his war on free speech and protests

Racism in Merseyside Police is a problem that runs deep

Merseyside police deploying Live Facial Recognition (LFR) isn’t just an Orwellian crack down on civil liberties, it reinforces existing racial bias. The technology is deeply flawed. The Home Office notes that it disproportionately targets marginalised communities.

Still, the police are assuring the people of Liverpool that when the software flags a person, their face will be compared to the database by an officer. Reassuring…hardly.

According to official statistics, Merseyside police already has the highest stop and search rate in England and Wales. Unsurprisingly, it shows the targeting of Black people, stopped at a rate three times higher than whites. The stats are clear — 61.9 searches per 1,000 Black residents, compared to just 19.2 for whites.

It gets worse.

The false positive rate is just 0.04% for white people, but jumps to 4% for Asians and 5.5% for Black people. For Black women, it’s even worse — a shocking 9.9%. That’s a 1 in 10 chance.

Placing a biased machine in a city synonymous with racialised policing will be a fucking nightmare, and we should be very fucking scared about it.

Furthermore, children as young as 12 are amongst hundreds of under-18’s included on the facial recognition watchlists. This leaves the door open for vulnerable minors in Liverpool to be targeted.

The crackdown on freedom to protest

If racial bias wasn’t terrifying enough, the LFR rollout poses a huge threat to democratic dissent in Liverpool. The watchlists used in previous LFR cases have included peaceful protesters not persons wanted for specific crimes.

The danger is even greater in Liverpool, where Merseyside police arrested 66 people under section 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000. These mass arrests have specifically targeted supporters of Palestine Action and crushed peaceful protest. Even more concerning is the site of these arrests — near the Wheel of Liverpool— the heart of the city where the facial recognition system is to be deployed.

The LFR system hands cops a tool to identify, track, and pre-emptively intervene against protesters. The risk is that anyone could be targeted — a person grabbing a coffee near a protest, walking through, or minding their own business.

And more scarily, these current systems currently operate in a legal vacuum. They have previously been deemed unlawful in the landmark ‘Bridges Case’ for violating privacy rights and data protection laws. The case found that LFR policies gave too much discretion to individual coppers.

One thing is clear: the latest deployment is an act of mass surveillance.

It’s time to say no

The rollout of Live Facial Recognition in Liverpool centre is a massive red flag — one we must actively fight. It combines existing police racism with biased technology, creating a recipe for mass discrimination.

Right now we need to be boycotting these surveillance zones or mask up, and stay updated with publications like Big Brother Watch to challenge every move these vans make.

They are selling this technology under the guise of keeping Liverpool safe. However, the outcome will be the criminalisation of communities of colour and activists. Unless Merseyside halts this rollout and commits to a transparent legal framework, Liverpool will serve as a warning to the rest of the UK.

The demands of a biased, illegal surveillance system, will continue eroding our basic rights and empowering the police.

Featured image via Unsplash/Sean Robbins

Tags: policeprotestracismUK
Share159Tweet99ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

French intervention in Benin coup is a clear case of neocolonialism

Next Post

UK councillors can now take a ‘Pledge for Palestine’

Next Post
Stock image of a Palestine flag on flagpole against blue sky. The DUP ignited the flames and then claimed to have helped extinguish them.

UK councillors can now take a 'Pledge for Palestine'

British government protects the identity of IRA spy Stakeknife

British government is hiding the identity of IRA spy linked to murders

Blue sign saying Maternity Unit in a hospital corridor

'Too many mothers' not sufficiently involved in their maternity care despite improvements

Green Party councillor David Francis

Green councillor nails the key to solving men's mental-health crisis

EHRC ban on trans women

EHRC trans ban: arguing over who is a 'true trans' won't save us

Comments 1

  1. Airlane1979 says:
    6 months ago

    “This racially biased technology” will, then, be fine if that bias could be removed. The problem is state surveillance, not just its bias against some groups of people.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

lebanon
Analysis

Israel’s illegal war against Lebanon leaves 250k without proof they owned their destroyed homes

by Maddison Wheeldon
16 June 2026
Andrea Egan speaking at the 2026 Unison health conference wearing her Unison lanyard and standing infront of a mic
Skwawkbox

Unison gen-sec: Labour is ushering in fascist Reform UK

by Skwawkbox
16 June 2026
Donald Trump and Gavin Newsom
Global

Democrat Newsom accuses Trump regime of lawfare

by Willem Moore
16 June 2026
sudan
Analysis

UN says drones killed over 1000 people in Sudan civil war in 2026

by Joe Glenton
16 June 2026
Reform councillors standing next to a man holding a sign which reads 'I would rather vote for Jimmy Saville than Labour'
Trending

Reform councillors suggest they’d vote for Jimmy Saville

by Willem Moore
16 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart