• Donate
  • Login
Thursday, June 4, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

Rupert Lowe is griping about proposals to lower the drink-drive limit

Alex/Rose Cocker by Alex/Rose Cocker
8 January 2026
in Analysis, UK
Reading Time: 4 mins read
194 6
A A
3
Home UK Analysis
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

On 7 January, Rupert Lowe – everyone’s least-favourite ‘too much even for the far-right’ MP – posted to social media this about the drink-drive limit:

An even stricter drink-drive limit is mental.

It will destroy rural pubs, and achieve absolutely sod all in terms of 'safety'.

I will oppose it in Parliament.

— Rupert Lowe MP (@RupertLowe10) January 7, 2026

Rather than a vague gripe at anything passingly ‘woke’ (a Lowe specialty), this tweet was actually referring to something currently relevant.

The UK government just launched a major new road safety overhaul. The strategy updates – which are currently up for public consultation – would constitute the biggest changes in over a decade. Most pertinently, the drink-driving limit looks set to drop dramatically.

Lower drink-drive limits

The proposed changes would mimic several strategies that are already in force in Scotland and Northern Ireland. As such, they’d apply to England and Wales only.

Among the plethora of policy updates, the government is looking to:

  • consult on introducing a three or six month minimum learning period for learner drivers

  • consult on a lower blood alcohol limit for novice drivers

  • consult on introducing mandatory eyesight testing for drivers over age 70 and develop options for cognitive testing for older drivers

More precisely, the Department for Transport (DfT) has proposed lowering the blood alcohol limit from 80mg to 20mg per 100mg (or 0.2g per litre) for new drivers.

However, it’s not just novices who would be affected by the new, lower limits. For everyone else, the new maximum would be 50mg per 100ml, in line with the current limit in Scotland.

The government’s policy document also made a strong case for lowering the limits:

The current limit (i.e. the legal maximum level of alcohol in the bloodstream on testing) is the highest in Europe and (in England and Wales) has not changed since it was introduced in 1969. This is despite the fact that in 2023, 1 in 6 fatalities were in drink drive collisions.

‘Highest in Europe’

When they say “highest in Europe”, they’re really not kidding either. The current limit in England and Wales is 0.8g/litre for all drivers. However, other European countries often distinguish between novice, experienced and commercial drivers in setting their maximums.

A map of Europe showing the UK in red, with most Western European countries in orange, and several Northern and Eastern countries in green.

The very lowest drink-drive limits – 0.0g/l, absolutely no blood alcohol across the board – are found in the Czech Republic, Romania, and Slovakia. Following close behind, Estonia, Norway, Poland and Sweden use a 0.2g/l limit. For context, that’s the amount we’re proposing for novice drivers.

Meanwhile, Denmark has a 0.5g/l limit for experienced drivers and 0.2g/l for novices. This exactly matches the DfT’s new proposals for the UK.

Beyond that, most of the rest of Europe uses a 0.5g/l limit. However, only Belgium, Bulgaria and Finland apply that same maximum to novices – Spain uses 0.3g/l for new drivers, and other countries set the limit at 0.2g/l, or even 0.0g/l.

Notably, everywhere but Bulgaria, Denmark, Finland, France, Latvia and the Netherlands also set a lower limit for commercial drivers. That is, they impose stricter limits on people driving taxis, lorries and buses.

Safe and sensible

Alcohol is a recreational drug, like any other. And, like other recreational drug, it strongly affects our ability to operate heavy machinery:

  • The brain takes longer to receive messages from the eye

  • Processing information becomes more difficult

  • Instructions to the body’s muscles are delayed resulting in slower reaction times

Note, also, that these drawbacks don’t happen only when you pass a certain blood-alcohol level. Even the smallest amount of alcohol impairs your driving ability. Legal drink driving limits are merely an arbitrary calculation of risk to the general public.

Contrary to the opinion of fossils like Rupert Lowe, and “even stricter” drink-driving limit would still leave us with the highest limits in Europe. It’s just that beforehand, our limits were two, three or even four times those of our continental neighbours.

There is no true ‘safe’ drink-driving limit. However, 0.5g/l is undoubtedly safer than 0.8g/l – that must should be obvious.

Featured image via the Canary

Tags: health
Share148Tweet93ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

The housing market is shafting young people right across Europe

Next Post

LIVE: US withdraws embassy staff from Israel and Lebanon

Next Post
US embassy staff

LIVE: US withdraws embassy staff from Israel and Lebanon

Red graffiti saying Drop L3Harris on the wall of Smiths Metal, believed to have links to the arms manufacturer L3Harris

Company linked to arms manufacturer targeted with spray paint and expanding foam

Starmer

Starmer’s latest ‘deeply regressive clampdown on protest’ delayed under pressure

TfL London Underground train at platform

RMT lambasts TfL for failing to insource cleaners

Green Party

Majority of largest teaching union’s members now back Green Party

Comments 3

  1. Airlane1979 says:
    5 months ago

    I doubt that the opponents of this change would welcome a raising of the legal limit on the use of drugs such as cannabis or heroin for drivers which currently stands at zero. Strange lack of consistency there.

    Reply
  2. alan1803harr says:
    5 months ago

    Never thought I’d say this, comrades, but on this I’m inclined to agree with Lowe. Old bloke here. I remember when I used to go out to rural Staffordshire back in 1970s for a few pints at the Fox Inn, Marston, near Wheaton Aston, a couple of miles off the A5. If driving, I’d limit myself to a couple of pints – three at the most. And, yes, the Fox has succumbed to the difficulty of finding punters in a rural location with no evening bus service.
    Airlane1979 is probably right, because a lot of people blithely accept the legal/illegal split, but I don’t think we need to give any justification to the “po-faced leftie” stereotype.

    Reply
  3. Jason says:
    1 week ago

    Honestly, people argue about drink-drive limits every single time it comes up, but if it makes the roads safer, then I don’t really see the issue.

    Tbh, the whole driving system feels chaotic already anyway. Even booking a test is a nightmare now. Everyone I know is constantly trying to find driving test cancellations because the waiting times are insane, and loads of people are using the DriveSoon website just to get an earlier slot without refreshing the DVSA page all day.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Robert Jenrick and Nigel Farage of Reform, and Kemi Badenoch
Trending

Jenrick struggles to defend Reform’s latest smear campaign

by Willem Moore
4 June 2026
Gaming and misogyny
Analysis

I’m a female gamer — I’m done with the industry’s misogyny

by Antifabot
4 June 2026
west bank
Analysis

Israel destroys vital fruit and veg market in West Bank

by Charlie Jaay
4 June 2026
Darren Jones
Skwawkbox

Starmeroid would-be leader Darren Jones cosied up to Mandelson

by Skwawkbox
4 June 2026
Trans rights activists hold placard
Analysis

Trans code debate shows some MPs remain allies of queer community

by Alex/Rose Cocker
4 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart