Nicola Sturgeon urges Scots to send ‘resounding message’ to Westminster

The Canary

Scotland’s future is “on the line” in December’s General Election, Nicola Sturgeon said as she called on Scots to back her party in that ballot to send a “resounding message” to Westminster.

The first minister and SNP leader urged Scots to “demand the right to choose a better future”.

Ms Sturgeon has already put the issue of a second independence referendum – which she wants to hold next year – at the heart of the SNP’s election campaign.

And as she addressed a rally of independence supporters in Glasgow’s George Square, she called on voters to  “demand the right to choose an independent future for Scotland” on December 12.

The event, which was staged by the pro-independence newspaper The National, was the first such rally that Ms Sturgeon has addressed since the referendum campaign of 2014.

According to the organisers, 20,000 people packed into the city centre square to hear the first minister and other speakers, including Scottish Brexit secretary Mike Russell and Mhairi Black MP.

The first minister told the crowd: “The General Election that we face now on December 12 is the most important election for Scotland in our lifetimes. The future of our country is on the line, and there is no doubt whatsoever that Scotland stands at a crossroads moment.”

There were boos from the audience when she claimed a victory for Boris Johnson in the election would result in “a future where Scotland gets ripped out of our European family of nations against our will, a future where the UK turns in on itself, a future of a hostile environment for migrants”.

And instead, she said: “There is a much better alternative. And that alternative is not a UK Labour government that can’t event make up its mind where it stands on the question of Brexit.”

Earlier on Saturday, Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn had argued against Scottish independence, saying if he was voted into Downing Street £70 billion of capital spending money would come to Scotland, as well as extra cash for health and education.

Mr Corbyn told reporters: “We want to see Scotland’s economy improve and the levels of poverty in Scotland, particularly in big cities, Glasgow, Edinburgh and Dundee, being reduced.

“It’s a Labour government that will do that. Scottish independence would mean a massive gap between what Scotland raises in taxation and what the Scottish people need at the present time.

“I think the much better option is a Labour government for the whole of the UK.”

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn (Aaron Chown/PA)

But Ms Sturgeon insisted: “The better alternative, the much better alternative for our country, is to take our future into our hands and to become an independent country.

“To invest in our people, and invest in our public services, and invest in lifting children out of poverty, not in a hard Brexit, not in Trident weapons of mass destruction on the River Clyde.”

She added: “We must come out in our numbers and vote in this election, vote to escape the chaos and the misery and the division of Brexit and vote to put Scotland’s future into Scotland’s hands.”

With the UK facing its first December election for almost a century, the first minister continued: “I know the nights are drawing in, I know the weather is getting colder and wetter, I know minds are turning to Christmas festivities.

“But all of us must make sure that over this next few weeks we persuade everyone we know, our family, our friends, our neighbours, our workmates, to come out on December 12 and send the biggest, loudest, most resounding message to Westminster that it is time for Scotland to choose our own future, it is time for Scotland to be an independent country.

“Let us inspire people with the positive message of everything an independent Scotland can be and everything the people of Scotland have it in themselves to achieve.”

First minister Nicola Sturgeon at the Indyref 2020 rally (Andrew Milligan/PA)

Annie Wells, a Conservative MSP for Glasgow, said however, that the election was about  “stopping Nicola Sturgeon from dividing our communities all over again” – and insisted only the Tories could achieve that.

Ms Wells, who was also campaigning in the city, said: “While Nicola Sturgeon is banging on about indyref2, I’m out talking to people about the state of their local schools, the drug deaths crisis and violent crime taking over our streets, and the problems at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital.

“Instead of tackling the day-to-day things that Glaswegians care about, Nicola Sturgeon is headlining a nationalist rally. She is showing everyone that her priority is indyref2 above everything else.

“So this election is about stopping Nicola Sturgeon from dividing our communities all over again, and only a vote for the Scottish Conservatives will do that.”

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. How many boos as opposed to how many cheers? Please Canary, you may love Jeremy, but Labour had many years to improve the lot of Scotland and didn’t. I respect Jeremy for his beliefs but he’s still a unionist who sees Scotland as somewhere to exploit. The so-called “Better Together” promises from all the unionist parties after the 2014 referendum have proved to be hollow. We’ll welcome a real Scottish Labour party after independence but not the Westminster branch office.

    2. I think it’s far better for Scotland to be independent, and in the long run for England too.
      The pace of change is rapidly increasing, and smaller countries are more adaptable to the change.
      The human mass as a whole isn’t.
      In an evolutionary sense the smaller survive. One has to look at the Scandanavian countries with a general population of around 4 million, and how well they are doing. Norway with its $800Billion hertiage fund after socializing its oil wealth.
      Sweden has opted to be smaller by choice after the misery of its war with Peter the Great.
      Polticians aren’t so inclined to fall prey to being meglomaniacs under the influence of unimaginable power.
      One looks at America with Trump leading the country, and still considered by half the populace to be a good choice. How inflexible this government is with its war machine solution for the world’s problems?
      Smaller countries means increasing the human diversity to finding niches in the world on how to survive.
      A smaller country treating its people well will be far ahead of the insane game going on now.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.