Air pollution is dangerous, but here’s why it shouldn’t stop you exercising

Figures released by the World Health Organisation (WHO) show that air pollution causes over three million premature deaths worldwide every year. Air pollution is rising across the globe, with cities in low and middle-income countries the worst affected. But a new study suggests that the health benefits of exercise (walking or cycling) outside outweigh the risks of inhaling toxic air, in all but the most polluted cities of the world.
Air pollution increases the risk of stroke, heart disease, lung cancer, and respiratory diseases, including asthma – exercise reduces the risk of illness such as heart disease, stroke and type 2 diabetes.
Researchers used computer modelling to compare the two effects. They calculated a ‘tipping-point’ where the harms from pollution and benefits of exercise were equal. For an average city, that was seven hours of cycling per day, or 16 hours walking. Their findings suggest that exercising outdoors is unlikely to put health at risk.
The researchers stressed this doesn’t mean that air pollution isn’t bad for people, but that inactivity is worse. Both have been defined as major public health crises.
Senior author Dr. James Woodcock says:
Whilst this research demonstrates the benefits of physical activity in spite of air quality, it is not an argument for inaction in combatting pollution. It provides further support for investment in infrastructure to get people out of their cars and onto their feet or their bikes – which can itself reduce pollution levels at the same time as supporting physical activity.
A recent report from the Royal College of Physicians estimates that 40,000 Britons die prematurely from air pollution every year, costing the economy £20 billion. The new WHO figures show that dozens of British cities are breaching recommended limits for air pollution.
Read on...
Support us and go ad-freeIt is important to note that the computer modelling did not take into account information on conditions in different locations within a city, the impact of short-term increases in air pollution, or information on the background physical activity or disease history of individuals. But their findings suggest that exercising outdoors in an urban environment is unlikely to put health at risk.
Feature image via Wikipedia
Support us and go ad-freeWe know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.