More research needed into risks of microplastics in drinking water, says WHO

Support us and go ad-free

The World Health Organisation (WHO) is calling for further research into the health risks posed by microplastics in drinking water.

It is also calling for an urgent reduction in plastic pollution to reduce the global population’s exposure to potentially harmful substances.

Microplastics are now ubiquitous in the natural world and, as well as being present in oceans and fresh waterways, they are now commonly found in drinking water from the tap as well as in bottled water.

Microplastics found in all UK rivers
Samples of plastics found during a survey of 13 UK rivers (Greenpeace/PA)

In a newly-published report, WHO scientists say the limitations of current data mean it is difficult to gauge the potential impact on human health if concentrations of microplastic in drinking water continue to rise.

The authors cite the problem of classifying microplastics as they come from a multitude of different materials and in various sizes.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

They can also be combined with numerous different chemicals – for example, flame retardants – depending on their original purpose.

Plastic fragments and fibres from synthetic fabrics were the most commonly found microplastics found in drinking water, the report found.

Hosepipe ban
Up to 90% of microplastics can be removed during existing water treatment (Niall Carson/PA)

The researchers believe the threat posed by microplastics is potentially three-fold – the physical risk of the particles themselves, the chemicals leached from degraded plastics, and “biofilms”.

Biofilms are microplastics that have been colonised by microorganisms, possibly leading to infection.

Based on existing data, the risk to health posed by microplastics is judged to be low because particles larger than 150 micrometres are unlikely to be absorbed into the human body through the gut.

Scientists expect the uptake of smaller particles to be low, but said the data relating to the absorption and distribution of nano-sized particles of plastic is extremely limited.

Despite growing public concern over microplastics in the food chain, the report found existing treatments are very effective at removing them from drinking water.

Up to 90% of microplastics can be removed via commonly-used water treatments to prevent faecal contamination, with filtration found to be the most effective method.

Dr Maria Neira, head of the department of public health, environment and social determinants at WHO, emphasised that swathes of the global population does not have access to effective water treatment infrastructure.

According to WHO data, around 67% of people in low and middle-income countries lack access to sewage connections, while about 20% of household sewage does not undergo at least secondary treatment.

Dr Neira said: “We urgently need to know more about the health impact of microplastics because they are everywhere – including in our drinking-water.

“Based on the limited information we have, microplastics in drinking water don’t appear to pose a health risk at current levels.

“But we need to find out more. We also need to stop the rise in plastic pollution worldwide.”

Call to protect oceans
Plastic pollution is one of the major problems facing the world’s oceans (Justin Hofman/Greenpeace/PA)

The report found that, according to current data, by tackling the problem of sewage-contaminated water, communities can simultaneously address the problem of microplastics.

Louise Edge, head of Greenpeace UK’s ocean plastics campaign, said: “This WHO report clearly acknowledges the major gaps in research around the human health risks posed by microplastics, so we cannot assume the risks are low. This is a research gap that must be filled.

“In the meantime, what we do know is that plastic is harming our marine wildlife and the fossil fuels needed to make plastics are contributing to our climate emergency.

“With that in mind, governments and businesses must – as the WHO recommends – urgently reduce plastic production.”

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop


The Canary Fund us