Plea for funding to help residents at risk of losing homes to coastal erosion

Support us and go ad-free

Councillors in Yorkshire are to discuss the “devastating” effect of erosion that will see dozens of people lose their homes to the sea on the fastest disappearing coastline in north west Europe.

Members of East Riding of Yorkshire Council are to meet in Beverley after a report found 24 homes are at risk on the coast, which has seen losses of up to 10 metres since March.

They are calling on the government to provide funding for affected residents – who face paying thousands of pounds to demolish their own homes and relocate.

Erosion on East Riding coastline: average per year since 1989
(PA Graphics)

Monitoring of the soft clay cliffs on the 80km Holderness Coast has found that the coastline is eroding at a rate of between 0.5m and 4m each year.

But a recent council report, which will be discussed at the environment and regeneration overview and scrutiny sub-committee meeting, revealed that some areas recorded losses in six months that were nearly double the annual rate, with the area south of Withernsea losing land at a rate of more than one metre each month.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

The report predicts that this erosion, which is likely to increase in future due to climate breakdown, will put 24 homes in Skipsea at risk by 2025.

But it says that a “single erosion event” could put a large number of properties at imminent risk within the next year and more than 200 residential properties will be lost within the next 100 years.

Government decisions have been to not defend much of the sparsely populated coastline, with coastal defences not economically, socially or environmentally sustainable for large stretches of the coast.

Coastal erosion
Houses on the coastline in Skipsea (Owen Humphreys/PA)

Councillor David Elvidge, who will chair Wednesday’s meeting, said: “With the amount of funding available, we can only really defend the large areas of population. It’s a devastating thing.”

Residents are also left facing a bill of thousands of pounds to demolish their homes and, while the council has historically met these costs, it cannot afford to fund the demolition of all 24 properties at risk.

As a result, councillor Jane Evison is now calling on the government to provide funding to help cover these costs, which she said can be as much as £20,000.

She said: “The council is in a position where they’re not allowed to defend a coastline and neither are the private householders, clearly there’s erosion taking place, one or two homes are at very high risk, yet there’s no funding.”

Skipsea coastal erosion
(PA Graphics)

Evison added: “I’ve asked for a letter to go to Defra [Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs] to say, ‘Look, as we’re not allowed to take action regards defending anything, we need funds available to keep people safe to help them with the costs of demolition and keep that coastline safe for people’.

“I don’t think it’s a fair situation when we’re not allowed to provide any protection but we’re picking up the bill to keep people safe.”

Elvidge said: “To lose your home and then the financial cost on top must be traumatic to say the least. If the government could stump up the cash, that would be fantastic.”

Coastal erosion
Erosion to the cliff round in 2011 (PA)

He said people in unprotected places such as Skipsea are “appalled” when they see coastal defence schemes being planned for other areas.

A £5.5m scheme, which has received £3m of funding from the European Regional Development Fund, is due to start in Withernsea this year.

He said: “It shouldn’t have to happen like that but unfortunately that’s where we are.”

The councillor said he hoped residents might be reassured after the meeting on Wednesday.

He said: “I want them to take away a reassurance that we’re doing everything we can to protect our coastline where we can and, where we can’t, we’re helping our residents every way we can.”

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. The government is awash with money & if one area of coast can be defended then all vunerable areas should be. BUT, as they are not large cliff-top estates owned by rich toffs, they will be ignored. This is UKania remember, where only the rich get government subsidies.

    2. The £5.5 million scheme received £3 million of funding from the European development fund. This wont happen after brexit, so the Government will have to start using the £350 million we are supposed to save after brexit. That’s what people in Yorkshire voted for.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.