Met Officers investigated for inappropriately accessing Sarah Everard case files

Met Police bosses are checking whether all the officers and staff who accessed files relating to Sarah Everard’s death did so legitimately. The force’s internal Directorate of Professional Standards is contacting all employees who looked at the records to check why they viewed the files.

The force would not say how many officers and staff were being contacted or why the action was being taken, but one officer linked to the investigation is already being examined by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) after sharing a highly offensive graphic with colleagues.

Highly offensive

The probationary constable in question was a cordon officer in Kent during searches. They have been placed in a non-public facing role while the matter is investigated. According to the Independent:

the force said its directorate of professional standards was made of aware of the incident after “a number of officers” who received the graphic reported being “concerned by its content”.

However, the Met has since stated that the graphic, which the officer shared on an undisclosed social media site, did not contain photographs or images of Everard, nor any “material related to the investigation into her death”.

The Met under scrutiny?

Marketing executive Everard went missing as she walked home from a friend’s house in Clapham, south London, on 3 March.

A major police investigation was launched and her body was found a week later in woodland in Kent. Met officer Wayne Couzens is now in custody, accused of her murder.

Read on...

Vigils held for Sarah also sparked controversy, after police were accused of aggression and violence towards protesters. Meanwhile, as The Canary previously reported, a police watchdog faced further accusations of ‘rubber-stamping‘ the force’s apparent heavy handedness. Floral tributes for Sarah Everard near the bandstand on Clapham Common

Floral tributes for Sarah Everard near the bandstand on Clapham Common (Yui Mok/PA)

Breaching professional standards?

A Met Police spokeswoman said on Monday:

Police officers and staff need to have access to computer records as part of their role. Officers and staff are only permitted to view specific records and data when there is a legitimate policing purpose for doing so. Accessing records without such a purpose can amount to a breach of professional standards or, in some cases, a criminal offence.

Officers from the Met’s Directorate of Professional Standards are in the process of contacting those officers and staff who accessed records relating to the investigation into the abduction and murder of Sarah Everard to ensure that each access was for a legitimate policing purpose.

Once all the responses have been received, a decision will be taken as to whether any further action is required.

Additional information and images via PA News 

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. An IOPC ‘investigation’ can’t be trusted. The IOPC regularly and by design dismisses all kinds of complaints and is really only an admin body to coordinate half-arsed sham investigations performed by internal Professional Standards departments which in turn are not what they’re presented as being. There’ll be more movement with this, more of a dance, because the murder naturally got attention and there’d be uproar if the IOPC shunted these conduct issues through the system in its usual fashion, but this will still only be an exercise in containment. Don’t be fooled. The police are not being taken to task here. ‘Professional Standards’ and the presence of the very far from independent IOPC mean nothing.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.