Scientists’ worst fears have become true and Britons have voted to leave the EU. The decision will likely have a huge impact on the scientific landscape of both the UK and Europe in years to come.
Last March a poll published by Nature, one of the leading scientific journals in the world, showed that over 80% of the surveyed researchers believed that the UK should remain within the EU, and that a Brexit would be “Very harmful” or “Somewhat harmful” for UK science. The journal has also pursued an active campaign for the “Remain” side, highlighting that the EU allows free movements of scientists, that the UK is the main recipient of the prestigious European Research Council research grants, and that outside the EU the UK would lose international influence.
Today, some of the leading voices in the UK scientific community have reacted to the result of the polls.
Free movement of scientists and fear of isolation are some of the major concerns. Professor Venki Ramakrishnan, President of the Royal Society said:
We need to continue to welcome researchers and students from abroad. Any failure to maintain the free exchange of people and ideas between the UK and the international community including Europe could seriously harm UK science
In the same line, the director of the Francis Crick Institute, Sir Paul Nurse, stated:
British scientists will have to work hard in the future to counter the isolationism of Brexit our science is to continue to thrive
Setting a new favourable scenario for collaborations with the EU is also considered a priority by many scientists. According to Sir Robert Lechler, president of the Academy of Medical Sciences:
We must ensure the UK retains its globally competitive edge in a post-Brexit world by finding ways to sustain the strong research collaborations we have built with our European partners. The scientific community needs to send a strong message that we are still open for business
The Chair of the Association of Medical Research Charities, Lord Sharkey urges the government to:
engage in a constructive dialogue with the medical research charities sector on the future of EU funding for research in the UK, and the regulations and policies that affect the medical research environment.
The result from the poll released this morning by YouGov, showing that most young people were favourable to remain within the EU, has also been considered by many scientists. Professor Lord Martin Rees, Fellow of Trinity College, said:
What is especially sad is that in the referendum vote, the younger people were strongly positive. They see themselves as ‘Europeans’ with a shared culture, and recognise that our continent can best achieve growing prosperity – and tackle global challenges – through the joint exploitation of science and technology
Professor Dame Anne Glover, Vice-Principal External Affairs and Dean for Europe of the University of Aberdeen, has also acknowledged the age-related differences in the vote:
I feel particularly badly for the 18-24 year olds who voted overwhelmingly to remain, perhaps because their knowledge of the EU was rather deeper from their recent education than for the older population
Featured image via Moyan Brenn/Flickr
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?