North Wales Police response to concern over its handling of hunt saboteurs raises serious questions

North Wales Police and the Flint & Denbighshire Hunt
Support us and go ad-free

On 24 July, North Wales Hunt Saboteurs claimed that North Wales Police (NWP) are “involved in an [operation] with the Flint and Denbigh hunt to get rid of protesters”. The hashtag “#OperationYada” accompanied the claim. Several days later, the NWP Rural Crime Team published a video on Twitter denying that ‘Operation Yada’ existed. But the truth suggests this team tried to mislead the public.

What is ‘Operation Yada’?

Local paper NorthWalesLive reported on 24 July that two members of North Wales Hunt Saboteurs had been cleared of assault charges against councillor and farmer Edward Lloyd-Ellis. This report said “police had an operation in response to hunt disruption”.

The sab group shared this article on Facebook and said:

North Wales Police are involved in an [operation] with the Flint and Denbigh hunt to get rid of protesters.

It will all come out in the wash #OperationYada

People then began asking the NWP, the Rural Crime Team, and Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) Arfon Jones about the operation:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

“I’ve never heard of Op Yada”

The NWP Rural Crime Team didn’t respond until it issued a video on 31 July. In the video, team manager Rob Taylor denied knowing about an ‘Operation Yada’ and suggested it “doesn’t even exist”:

He said:

I don’t know. I’ve never heard of Op Yada. I don’t know what Op Yada is…

When we get questions in that are unfounded and have no basis and are just there to sort of try and provoke us, we simply don’t answer them. It’s just not worth getting involved or embroiled in a discussion over something that doesn’t even exist.

However, the following day, NorthWalesLive published an article on a clash between Lloyd-Ellis and North Wales Hunt Saboteurs member Dafydd Hughes. The report quoted NWP chief inspector Jeff Moses, who said the force:

has a well-established operation in place to police the issues surrounding hunt activities and to investigate any offences which are evident or reported.

This operation has a command structure and detailed plans which make it clear that we police any incidents with impartiality and that we will facilitate peaceful protest.

As police monitoring group Netpol pointed out, this statement appeared to contradict Taylor’s claim the day before.

It’s actually…

The Canary contacted the NWP about this apparent contradiction. We asked if it has an operation for hunting and protests and, if so, what it has named the operation. It replied on 5 August, saying:

the operation… is called Operation Yarder

This was also backed up by a Freedom of Information request by Kevin Blowe of Netpol. The NWP told Blowe on 6 August:

there is a policing operation in place for the last 3 years (Op YARDER) to police hunting and hunt protest activity in North Wales.

Taylor was technically correct saying that ‘Operation Yada’ doesn’t exist. But his answer glibly side-stepped the spirit of the public’s concern. Netpol told The Canary:

The comment posted by Rob Taylor… was particularly contemptuous towards members of the public expressing concerns about the force’s relationship with the Flint & Denbigh Hunt. The denial of any knowledge of ‘Operation Yada’ and the dismissal of questions about it as conspiracy theories is astonishing when North Wales Police has been conducting ‘Operation Yarder’, policing hunting and protests against hunt activity, for three years.

The Rural Crime Team’s responsibilities include wildlife and environmental crime and it seems inconceivable that its members wouldn’t know about it. Either this is incompetence or it is wilful dissembling. No wonder opponents of hunting, who are simply trying to monitor breaches of the law, feel the police are refusing to act impartially.

Sleight of hand

In the NWP’s response to The Canary, PCC Jones said:

The North Wales Rural Crime Team Twitter account is unusual in that it is not risk averse in what it posts and as a consequence has a large number of followers. Not everything they publish is universally approved and they have had to mute and block a number of accounts in the past because of the content. As with all policing roles the rural policing teams police communities where there are tensions and there are difficulties in maintaining balance and impartiality.

But Taylor’s response misleads the public about the NWP’s role in policing hunting and saboteur activity. Twitter user Badgerman even attempted to clarify Taylor’s response, but the NWP repeated its denial:

The NWP’s apparent sleight of hand over public knowledge about Operation Yarder makes a mockery of its alleged impartiality.

The Canary contacted the NWP with the allegation of an attempt to mislead the public. But it declined to respond.

‘Coming out in the wash’

In January, Cheshire Police issued a now-deleted statement that said video footage online “frequently… does not reflect the full scenario”. It was referring to footage that Cheshire Hunt Saboteurs made public on social media. However, Cheshire’s PCC David Keane challenged the statement as “inappropriate” and, as a result, the police took the statement back. But the incident appeared to be an attempt to undermine public trust in evidence put forward by sabs.

Hunting is illegal. Saboteurs and monitors ensure hunts aren’t breaking the law. Yet the NWP felt it was appropriate to issue a misleading statement that appeared to discredit North Wales Hunt Saboteurs. But now, the truth has “come out in the wash”. And it raises serious questions about the NWP Rural Crimes Team’s impartiality.

Featured image via North Wales Hunt Saboteurs

Support us and go ad-free

Get involved

  • Follow North Wales Hunt Saboteurs on Facebook.
  • Donate to the Hunt Saboteurs Association.

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us