Full-on racism was ‘tactically the wrong choice,’ admit Tories (VIDEO)

Support us and go ad-free

THIS POST IS SATIRICAL. It is republished here with permission by authors at The Hourly Terrier, go check out the rest of their awesome work when you’re done.

The Conservative Party have once more found themselves divided this week – torn between those who think that racism wasn’t the right tactical choice, and those who basically just think “f*ck ‘em” (MPs like Michael Fallon, who is quoted several times in this BBC article – quoted so much in fact that they couldn’t find space to quote from any of the Tories who were critical of Mr Goldsmith).

To be fair, several prominent Tories have called the campaign out for what it was – i.e. out-and-out racism – but many seem to be judging it more on the basis that it failed, and not by the fact that it was pure and unbridled bigotry.

We spoke to a top Tory campaign strategist – one Cruella Chienmerde-Couer to find out what she feels was wrong with Zac’s campaign:

Q: “So, Cruella – what do you think the problem with Zac’s campaign was?”

CCC: “Our analysis is telling us that focussing so much on Sadiq meant that we didn’t convincingly explain what a Conservative Mayor would stand for.”

Q: “To be fair, I think people did get the gist of what he’d stand for, and that was racism.”

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

CCC: “Hmm, yes – that is what people are telling us. We certainly failed to connect with people aged 18-45 who consider themselves to be racism intolerant, and there are a lot of these intolerant people about, unfortunately.”

Q: “And do you have a problem with the fact that racism is just inherently wrong?”

CCC: “Could you define ‘wrong,’ sorry? Do you mean as in ‘unsuccessful’ or ‘legally dubious?”

Q: “I mean as in morally wrong.”

CCC: “Mo-wo-wa-wa? Sorry – what was that word again? Is it French?”

Q: “As in evil.”

CCC: “Evil, you say? Well it did give me that tingly feeling watching it, so I suppose you could say that, yes.”

Q: “And you realise that ‘evil’ is bad, right?”

CCC: “Evil is bad? No – I’m pretty sure that’s ‘eagles,’ actually. Because they’re all environmental and that.”

Q: “Urgh – anyway – another problem is that although several lower-tier Tories have criticised the campaign, there was barely anyone speaking out while it happened. And also, this campaign was fully supported by the likes of David Cameron and Boris Johnson – politicians who are yet to admit that Zac’s approach was reprehensible.”

CCC: “And you’re confused? If you go around admitting that you’ve done something wrong, then it makes you look like you’ve done something wrong.”

Q: “But you have done something wrong!”

CCC: “Well good luck getting anyone important to admit that.”

Q: “When there were accusations of anti-Semitism in the Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn immediately suspended those involved and launched an enquiry into the matter – will David Cameron now follow suit to prove that the Tories don’t have a problem with racism?”

CCC: “Oooo – big mistake. You just mentioned the words ‘Jeremy Corbyn’ and ‘anti-Semitism’ – now that’s all anyone will have to report.”

Q: “What? We’re interviewing you, numb-nuts, and we’ll report this however we like.”

CCC: “And who’s going to read it – the sort of people who believe whatever we have the BBC tell them, or a load of terrorist-sympathising tw*ts like yourself?”

Q: “Err…”

CCC: “Check mate, shit-face.”

At this point Cruella stood up, farted in our general direction, and then left the building.

And although it stank – stank so bad that we considered catching up to her and convincing her to visit a vet – the stench was still no worse that that of Zac Goldmith’s awful, awful campaign.

Featured Image via The Hourly Terrier

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed