Comparing someone to Trump is now considered to be a debate-losing argument

Comparing someone to Trump
Support us and go ad-free

In 1990 Mike Godwin came up with the world-famous famous ‘Godwin’s Law’. An adage which asserts:

As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.

Related to this law is the idea that whoever made the Hitler comparison has by default lost the argument. And people are now using this same adage for comparisons with Donald Trump.

Or as he is more colloquially known online, Twitler:


The realisation came during a heated message board exchange that ended with someone referring to their rival as:

A poundshop Donald.

It was agreed by all that the use of Trump as an insult was a gross overstep, and the offender rightfully conceded the argument.

A similar thing happened not long after, as two Twitter-debaters simultaneously referred to one another as a:

Ridiculous, orange bastard.

After confirming they were both imagining Trump, the pair admitted a no-score draw, and went their separate ways. Probably to to argue with Piers Morgan like everybody else.

The final straw, however, came when a nursery teacher shouted at a room full of 3-year-olds:

You semi-literate simpletons are no better than the President of the United States!

And even though they were only toddlers, they knew that this was an unwarranted escalation. The teacher correctly resigned not long after, and went to have a big think about her whole deal.

Creative profanity

As is normal now, we will probably be called ‘politically correct’ for saying that it’s offensive to liken people to Trump. But you have to remember that the people calling you that are the sort who wouldn’t even mind being compared to Trump. And as such, they are clearly worse than every 20th century dictator combined.

But – oh shit – did I just lose my own argument?



Get Involved!

– For more satirical news, you can also follow Off The Perch on Facebook and Twitter.

Featured image via Flickr

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed