United Airlines confirms leggings ban and presses ahead with further rules

United Airlines leggings ban
John Ranson

An airline which stopped several girls from travelling because they were wearing leggings has refused to budge.

The girls were travelling on an employee family pass and were therefore ‘representing the company’. Perhaps their paycheques are in the post.


United Airlines has stood firm over its policy, despite the best efforts of a number of celebrities. A lot of people who aren’t celebrities also thought United was being a douche and gave the PR team a day to remember.


The airline has now confirmed that female ‘pass travellers’ under 18 months old should wear a full coverage Babygro. Above that age but under 13, they should dress like Jessica Fletcher from Murder, She Wrote. Teens and older should wear full buttoned-up Victorian day dresses. No ankles or wrists on view. Bosses hope this should confirm United’s reputation as a really respectable airline.

United attempted to fend off accusations of double standards by confirming that boys and gentlemen would also have to wear clothes.


Aviation experts have questioned the safety aspects of United’s plan to make its planes wear top hats. Although they’ve conceded that, once all planes have to taxi along behind a nostalgia-soaked man-with-a-red-flag, this won’t be a problem. United admits the new procedure will lengthen journey times. And it may have to withdraw certain destinations that don’t have wide enough roads for a jumbo.

Up themselves

Off The Perch contacted a United executive to ask whether anyone had thought any of this through. “I don’t make the rules, I just enforce them” was his eerily robotic response.

Get Involved!

– For more satirical news, you can also follow Off The Perch on Facebook and Twitter.

Featured image via Wikimedia / Wikimedia

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed