Media commentators have a new pet name for anyone to the political left of former Prime Minister Tony Blair. And it’s ‘alt-left’. Self-described liberal commentators are essentially arguing that people who want to share more are comparable to neo-Nazis.
The origins of this pet name
I was first made aware of this noxious new name when I was called it during a public debate. Mail columnist Dan Hodges flung it at me casually as he decried the rise of the left and right as equally terrifying prospects. But after this first baffling encounter, I noticed it everywhere.
The term originates in the US, with the fascist movement that calls itself the alt-right. As The Canary previously reported, these are people who have actually used the Nazi salute.
Continue reading below...
— CST (@CST_UK) November 23, 2016
It’s been promoted by media outlets sympathetic to this neo-Nazi movement, such as The Daily Caller, Breitbart and Fox News. From there, it made its way into the common terms of abuse thrown by the movement’s supporters on social media.
Gee, Bill. That kind of thought is anti-PC. The alt-left thought police will get you. (Note sarcasm) hmmmmm. On second thought, not far off https://t.co/OgL3pEeG8U
— buck-Not Tired of Winning. Nationalist. 🇺🇸 (@cliffhangernlv) February 25, 2017
— Proud Deplorable Kat (@katlivezey) February 25, 2017
In the fine tradition of the Alt-Left, Slate sinks to a new low–if that is possible! Slate – a true irredeemable deplorable!
— Red Pencil (@RedPencilEditor) February 25, 2017
But it spread into liberal America too, used against those who voted for Bernie Sanders or Green candidate Jill Stein. The term even made it into Vanity Fair.
And now, neoliberals in the UK have hijacked the term to attack the traditional left here.
What crimes can see you labelled ‘alt-left’? Well, such extremist acts as showing support for Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, marching to oppose NHS cuts, or writing about the impacts of welfare cuts and austerity.
There is chest-deep irony in a group of people comparing others to the ‘alt-right’ while so gleefully adopting their talking points.
Everything that is ridiculous about that pet name
Of course, the term is blatantly absurd. There is no equivalence between the traditional left and the so-called ‘alt-right’. The former is a legitimate and mainstream world view that promotes social justice, equality, and progressive values. The latter is the opposite. Yet some liberal commentators argue that these are two sides of the same coin.
This makes as much sense as arguing that an arsonist and a firefighter are two sides of the same coin. One is committed to starting a fire, the other to putting it out. These commentators would argue that the only moderate way forward would be a compromise. Let the arsonist burn down half the building. Your half. And when the firefighter pushes them out of the way to fight the flames regardless, the commentators would scream: “Oh my god! It’s another one of those alt-arsonists!”
When you spread those BS "the alt-left is bad too" articles you're literally reading neo-nazi talking points they designed for you
— Rapid Onset Revolutionary Anger (@Falcc) March 4, 2017
There's no fucking alt-left. There's the actual left & then there are liberals who pretend to be left. Stop this nonsense
— ADRIAN MARIE JONES (@AJAYNY) March 7, 2017
Neoliberals hate being called 'neoliberal,' a *real* word describing someone promoting an ideology, yet circulate the bogus term 'alt-left' pic.twitter.com/ZAaPRV81qT
— Petty is Praxis (@rtyson82) March 7, 2017
The trouble with liberals
But from the vantage point of modern liberalism, the arsonist and the firefighter are comparable.
For at least the past three decades (perhaps far longer), the liberal project in politics and the media has become the preserve of privilege. A largely white, largely male, largely wealthy media and political class has confused liberalism with centrism.
Liberalism, if it is to mean anything, is radical. It seeks constantly to defy and dismantle unjust attitudes, policies and practices which restrict freedoms vital to full participation in private and public life.
Centrism is a politics of relativism – it looks to its left and its right, considers both sides equivalent and extreme, and pitches its tent between the two.
This is why, no matter how far to the right that ‘centre’ moves, the centrists will argue that anyone to the left is just as terrifying as anyone to the right. They see extremes when there are merely opposites. Contrary to their view, there are some values which are absolute. And advocating for them against a resurgent right is not extremism. It is humanity in action.
Play your part in the ongoing media revolution by reading and supporting new media organisations that do better.
Please add more that you like in the comments.
The Canary, Media Diversified, Novara Media, Corporate Watch, Common Space, Media Lens, Bella Caledonia, Vox Political, Evolve Politics, Real Media, Reel News, STRIKE! magazine, The Bristol Cable, Manchester Meteor, Salford Star
Featured image via Wikimedia Commons
Since you're here ...
We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.