Contrary to international law, the United Kingdom effectively made Shamima Begum stateless. Ideally, we should follow international laws. But, as there’s precedent now, why not use that power to banish some other people we don’t like?
Unless, of course, there’s something about Begum which makes it easier for the state to convince people she doesn’t belong here.
A Mail on Sunday commentator asked the following:
Those people supporting the removal of Shamima Begum’s citizenship need to stop and think about what would happen if Jeremy Corbyn and John McDonnell had this power.
— (((Dan Hodges))) (@DPJHodges) February 19, 2019
It is worth asking what would happen if any leader had this power. Because when states remove citizenship from people, that makes them other countries’ problems. Imagine if terrorists snuck into the UK and their country of origin washed their hands of them. This is what we’re creating the precedent for.
The world did ask this question, obviously, which is why we made the act of making people stateless illegal. But worries aside, that precedent exists now, so how should we use it?
The obvious choice is Dan Hodges himself – if only to make him finally right about something. There are bigger fish to fry than Hodges, though, so let’s look at people who – like Begum – went to work with hostile, foreign powers.
Sir Nick Clegg helped instigate austerity which has led to an estimated 120,000 deaths. Away from home, Clegg went to work for Facebook. This came after a string of revelations about how the company violated people’s privacy. There have also been accusations of Facebook being used to influence elections and spread fake news that destabilised several countries.
But is Facebook worse than Daesh (Isis/Isil)? And does it matter? If we’re ignoring the law, surely we can just ignore it as we see fit?
Still – it’s hard to imagine elements of the media getting behind Clegg’s banishment in the same way they did Begum’s. What is it about her that’s different?
Let’s look at some even worse Britons to see if we can figure it out.
The creme de la shit
Sir Mark attempted to avoid implication in the illegal coup, but was found guilty by a court in South Africa, where he was living at the time, of having provided finance for helicopters to be used in the overthrow. He was fined $500,000 and given a four-year suspended prison sentence.
So did we banish him? Err, no. We did discuss potentially stripping him of his title, but we ultimately couldn’t even do that. Sir Mark had friends in high places – namely his mother – who allegedly knew and approved of her son’s coup attempt.
Another person who Thatcher had a fondness for was Tony Blair. But is it fair to compare Begum to Blair? Probably not. She was groomed as a 15-year-old to go and fight in a destabilised country on behalf of Daesh; Blair helped instigate the ‘illegal war‘ that “destabilised the entire Middle East” and led to the formation of Daesh.
So no – obviously you can’t compare the two. Blair is considerably worse. But imagine the looks you’d get if you suggested deporting him to George W Bush’s dude ranch.
So why is it easier for some people to imagine Begum being stripped of citizenship than him?
The constant barrage of negative press about British Muslims serves to ‘other’ them. As Miqdaad Versi said in 2016 (and things haven’t improved since):
Recent research by the University of Cambridge has shown that mainstream media reporting about Muslim communities is contributing to an atmosphere of rising hostility toward Muslims in Britain…
More than half of Britons see Islam (the mainstream religion, not Islamist fundamentalist groups) as a threat to Western liberal democracy. Over 30 per cent of young children believe Muslims are ‘taking over England’ and hate crime against Muslims continues to rise, up by 70 per cent in the last year , according to the Metropolitan police.
In this situation, you can see why some people find it easy to think British Muslims don’t truly belong here; that their citizenship is up in the air. The un-personing of Shamima Begum will only make that situation worse. The government may claim to be acting for our safety, but what it’s done only makes life more tenuous for UK Muslims.
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?