As Grayling comes second in a one horse race, Johnson’s authority is in tatters

Chris Grayling and Boris Johnson
John Ranson

It may seem like no more than a classic Westminster soap opera. But the hoo-ha over Chris Grayling’s failure to win a parliamentary committee chair says everything about Boris Johnson’s cack-handed attempts to run the country. In effect, Johnson attempted to rig a process that was already stacked in his favour and still failed to get the result he wanted.

Jobs for the boys

The select committee system is one of the bits of Westminster’s obscure structure that actually has the potential to work rather well. Committees are set up to focus on a specific topic and evaluate the government’s performance on that subject. Some are made up of MPs, some of peers and some a mixture. Members, and especially chairs, are generally expected to have some level of interest and specialist knowledge in the relevant area. Committees can call ministers to answer questions on policy and can also hear from external experts to aid their understanding of the issues. Being a committee chair is seen as quite prestigious and sought-after among parliamentarians. It used to be in the prime minister’s gift to distribute such roles, but increasingly chairs are chosen by a secret ballot of the committee’s members.

The Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) is not strictly a ‘select committee’ but it functions in a broadly similar fashion. Aside from its important area of work, there are a number of reasons why this committee stands out. Firstly, because it hasn’t existed since the end of the previous parliament (ie since November 2019). That’s an unusually long period of time for a committee to lie dormant. Secondly, the ISC is responsible for the ‘Russia Report’. This document looks at alleged Russian interference in UK democratic processes. It was compiled by the ISC in its previous incarnation but Johnson failed to approve its publication before the general election. Thirdly, Johnson attempted to roll back the years by installing his own pick as ISC chair. And this is where his problems began.

Failing Grayling

Like an idiot, Johnson tried to get Chris ‘Failing‘ Grayling voted in as ISC chair. The plan was simple, at least in the tumbleweed-ridden space between Johnson’s ears. The composition of committees broadly reflects the parliamentary strength of the various parties so there are five Tory seats on the nine member ISC. So, the plan went, make sure those five are all loyal types who’ll vote the way they’re told and job’s a good ‘un.

However, when word got out that the PM wanted Grayling to take the role, even Tory in-house newsletter the Telegraph couldn’t hide its bewilderment. Describing Grayling brutally as “neither intelligent nor secure”, the paper’s headline called the nomination “a new low in the government’s aversion to scrutiny”. However, Johnson must by now be used to the daily tide of commentary reminding him what an utterly useless and ill-suited leader he is. In fact, his habit of ignoring all criticism as if it’s clearly misguided and irrelevant has served him disconcertingly well.

And so it was that on Wednesday afternoon, the day of the vote, Tory ISC member Julian Lewis “received a text asking me to confirm that I would be voting for the prime minister’s preferred candidate for the ISC chair”. Lewis didn’t reply, “as I considered it an improper request”. He added: “At no earlier stage did I give any undertaking to vote for any particular candidate”. And, it would appear, Lewis didn’t vote for Grayling, but rather for himself. The four opposition members also apparently voted for Lewis, giving him a five-four win.

Downing Street hissy fit

It’s fair to say Johnson wasn’t best pleased to see things not go his way. Lewis was immediately sacked as a Tory MP, reportedly because he’d “acted with the opposition for his own advantage”.

Previous ISC chair Dominic Grieve told the BBC:

What troubles me about this episode, quite apart from its utter absurdity, and now withdrawing the whip from Julian, who is indeed highly respected, is the mindset it gives about what on earth is going on in Downing Street. Why did they try to manipulate this process? They shouldn’t have done. The committee can only exist, the committee can only be respected… if it is seen to be non-partisan, and independent.

Former national security adviser Peter Ricketts welcomed the surprise appointment of Lewis. He’d warned that Grayling didn’t “match up” to the authority and reputation of former chairs.

And Labour deputy leader Angela Rayner branded the move against Lewis “grubby”:

More reaction

Labour MP Chris Bryant said:

It’s a momentous failure of intelligence when a PM takes months to handpick intelligence and security committee members so as to deliver the chair he wants and they refuse to do his bidding. To then chuck the new chair out of the party is to lose control / the plot.

SNP defence spokesperson Stewart McDonald called it a “total shambles”:

This is another total shambles from the Tory government, which has failed to put in place a functioning intelligence and security committee for more than six months since the election. With his abysmal record of failure as a Tory minister, Chris Grayling is the only man who could lose a rigged election but it is right the committee has elected a chair and it should now get on with the crucial job of ensuring scrutiny and oversight of security matters, after months of delay.

Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesperson Alistair Carmichael said Johnson had appointed “yes men” to the ISC but “true to form, however, failing Grayling has been undone in his bid to be chair”.

“I hope we now have a committee with real teeth that can hold this government to account,” he added.

“That starts by publishing the report into Russian interference of our democracy before the summer recess so MPs can scrutinise it fully.”

The man without the Midas touch

As PM, Johnson hasn’t just been lazy and shit-witted. He’s even begun to be unlucky. And history shows that luck is the most precious of all political commodities. Despite surrounding himself with sycophants and nodding dogs, Johnson appears incapable of exercising control. To bungle something as straightforward as nobbling a committee shows he can’t even manage the everyday dirty work required within Westminster. So he’s frankly got no chance on the more elevated prime ministerial tasks of national, let alone international, leadership. He should quit while he’s not too badly behind.

Featured image via PA / ©UK Parliament/Jessica Taylor

Additional reporting by Press Association

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. So nice to see that now that Brexit is done and we have our democracy back it works so well ! Johnson and his sycophants what a shower or sh*t they are. If Chris the miss graylings brains were made of dynamite he wouldn’t have enough to blow his hat off ! The whistling he hears in his ears is not tinnitus its because there’s nothing between them to stop the wind going through.

      The thought of boy Chris in charge of anything with intelligence in its name is a bit like trying to wade through treacle ! Hard to achieve !!!!!!!

      I despair sometimes !

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.