A BBC editor explains the ‘strengths’ of its male and female presenters. You couldn’t make it up.
Sarah Sands is the editor of BBC Radio 4‘s flagship news programme Today. And she’s claimed that presenter John Humphrys is the best at holding power to account, while the two women presenters are better at fashion.
Sands made her remarks during an interview on the BBC’s Feedback programme on 6 July. The interview focused on complaints the BBC received about Today. Feedback presenter Roger Bolton said that:
Feedback certainly gets more complaints about Today than any other programme.
Many complaints centre around presenter John Humphrys and his “attack dog” style. He’s been accused of Brexit bias, deriding Rwanda’s sponsorship deal with Arsenal FC, “belittling” tennis player Johanna Konta, and joking about the BBC‘s gender pay gap.
On 27 June, he interviewed Tony Blair about immigration. During the interview, Humphrys said:
What do you do now about all of these people who want to come here? And there are millions, upon millions, upon millions of them… They’re out there. They’re either on their way here, or planning to come here. And millions have already come here.
Earlier this year, following the death of scientist Stephen Hawking, Humphrys asked scientist Brian Cox:
I wonder whether he was ever, or whether it was ever said of him in your profession, that he was cut a bit of slack because he was so desperately disabled.
Excellent, devoted, compassionate?
Sands was quick to defend Humphrys on Feedback. She appeared to be prepared for a fight, having arrived with two letters from listeners praising him. She referred to the letters as “equal evidence” that some people like the presenter. One described Humphrys as “most excellent, devoted, compassionate”.
Sands went on to give her own opinion of the presenter a Feedback listener had earlier described as “boorish and ignorant”. She said:
I think he is, as I say, the person you want when you want to hold power to account.
Women are better at fashion
But Sands hadn’t dug herself in deep enough by simply defending Humphrys. She continued:
We have five presenters. They all have different strengths. I have said that I think, you know, on the whole, Mishal and Martha might be slightly better on fashion.
She was referring to Mishal Husain and Martha Kearney, the only women presenters of the Today programme. A previous female Today presenter, Sarah Montague, moved to the BBC’s World at One programme after it was revealed she was being paid less than a quarter of Humphrys’ £660k-£649k salary.
Sands’ remarks sparked quite a reaction on Twitter:
Jeez…us….what an absolutely ignorant thing to say. I would have @MishalHusainBBC or @Marthakearney any day of the year. John Humphreys couldn't hold a snowman to account. #makeTodayGreatAgain
— swen_28002 ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? (@Swen28002) July 7, 2018
Sorry, just remind me which century we’re in ?
— Julia Dunlop (@juliadarwen) July 6, 2018
… I'm always frustrated that he simply permits the Tory incompetents to flim-flam every bloody morning without challenge. Yes, like other male presenters, you hear a lot of his strident voice, but that's not 'holding power to account', it's the same old…
— Peter Kinderman (@peterkinderman) July 7, 2018
Really? The only thing John Humphrys is fit for is retirement
— Cate Schofield (@CateSchofield) July 6, 2018
Perhaps Husain and Kearney are best on fashion. Perhaps Humphrys really is first-rate at holding power to account. Or perhaps the Today programme has a totally different idea of what strength is to much of the rest of the country.
– Support The Canary.
Featured images via BBC Newsnight – YouTube / BBC World News – YouTube
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.