Johnson’s latest coronavirus policy was just called ‘communism’. It should sound familiar.

Boris Johnson
Support us and go ad-free

There have been many accusations about the Tory government’s coronavirus response. From it being too slow, to being led by behavioural scientists, Boris Johnson’s approach has come in for severe criticism. And now, the PM has been accused of delving into “communism”. Probably because he’s just taken a policy from ‘that far-left agitator’ Jeremy Corbyn.

Coronavirus: Johnson goes communism?

As the Guardian‘s Jim Waterson tweeted:

Yes, it’s true. The Tory government has effectively taken control of broadband providers. Kind of.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

As the Department for Culture, Media and Sport announced on Sunday 29 March, the Tories have struck a deal with broadband companies. It will see “all providers”:

  • “Working with customers who find it difficult to pay their bill as a result of Covid-19 to ensure that they are treated fairly and appropriately supported”.
  • “Remove all data allowance caps on all current fixed broadband services”.
  • “Offer some new, generous mobile and landline packages to ensure people are connected and the most vulnerable continue to be supported”.
  • “Ensure that vulnerable customers or those self-isolating receive alternative methods of communication wherever possible if priority repairs to fixed broadband and landlines cannot be carried out”.

Of course, the devil is in the detail. The government has not made clear whether by “vulnerable” customers it means the ones it deems to be “high risk“. Also, while ‘supporting’ people to pay their bills is all well and good, the announcement doesn’t indicate what this means in reality.

Hang on…

People on Twitter immediately spotted the spooky similarities between Johnson’s government’s announcement and something else. That something else being Labour’s 2019 manifesto:

Yes, of course – this is the news that the PM forcing the hand of broadband companies has echoes of a Labour 2019 policy pledge. The one where it was going to nationalise broadband. As its manifesto noted:

We will need world-class digital infrastructure in which everyone can share.

Labour will deliver free full-fibre broadband to all by 2030.

So, while the Tories moderate strong-arming of broadband companies is a world away from nationalisation, it still marks another step-change in the government’s approach to the coronavirus pandemic.

All that glitters isn’t gold

In a few weeks, we’ve seen from the Tories:

  • An increase in some social security payments.
  • Help for small businesses.
  • Support for self-employed people.
  • A pledge to give the NHS “whatever it needs, whatever it costs”.

You could say this is all a bit ‘socialist’; all this state intervention and increased money for public services. But in reality, this isn’t a socialist solution to the crisis.

So far, the estimate of the total value of the Tories’ coronavirus bailouts is around £200bn and counting; more than all the 2008 banker ones put together:

Coronavirus spending

And once the initial dust has settled after the pandemic, the money will have to come back from somewhere. So far, nobody knows exactly where that somewhere is. Although given the Tories’ parliamentary majority, the word “austerity” may feature heavily in their solution to what will be a massive budget deficit. Chancellor Rishi Sunak has already suggested tax rises may be on the way.

Once a Tory…

But perhaps the bigger problem here is that it has ultimately been over a decade of Tory rule and austerity which has made the UK so unprepared for coronavirus. As Corbyn recently wrote for the Sunday Mirror:

the tragedy is that a decade of cuts and austerity has made their job so much harder and left us all ill-prepared for the pandemic we now face.

Our NHS is on its knees. We have fewer doctors and nurses per head than most other developed countries and only a quarter of the vital ICU beds per person that Germany has.

Even Jeremy Hunt, who imposed brutal austerity on our health service, now admits he regrets many of his cuts.

So, it sticks in the throat somewhat that after years of cuts, only now do the Tories decide to invest in this country’s people and public services. Of course, not because they care. But because they’re worried about the economic fallout of the pandemic. In reality, there’s no ‘Marxism’ in any of Johnson’s measures; however much forcing broadband companies’ hands seems like it. It’s just more protection of corporate capitalism. Protection we may all end up footing the bill for, anyway.

Featured image via UK parliament – Jessica Taylor

Support us and go ad-free

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. Did Thatcher the Evil One get cremated? (Surely that would have involved toxic pollution if so)
      If not- an electrode attached to either end of the coffin, with the Iron Witch (sorry, witches) rotating in an electric field should produce quite a nice little sustainable current.
      We can use it to power an NHS hospital.
      She’d fkin hate that 🙂

    2. In your article you state “And once the initial dust has settled after the pandemic, the money will have to come back from somewhere.” It’s really sad to read things like this on a left-leaning news feed, since it is simply a restatement of the neoliberal myth that “running a government budget is like running a household budget”, which it is not, unless the household in question has a fiat currency it can print at will.
      Modern Monetary Theory, an explanation of how fiat currencies actually function is explained here and demonstrates why your statement is wrong:
      What’s sad is that your statement plays entirely into hands of right-wing austerity mongers.

      1. More accurately, the article could have said “will be taken back from somewhere”, indicating volition rather than “impersonal forces”. And I entirely agree that there is more than enough wealth to pay for it, if the .1% was taxed properly (Wouldn’t THAT be a different world!). Or indeed, if it was just printed as in QE.

        At the same time, one cannot just “print money” never-endingly, and you have to recognise that. Yes its fiat, but its also tied into global mechanisms that prevent a Govt from having too much lee-way.

        You’d need a Corbyn-Govt who doesn’t give two monkeys about short-term problems to succeed with that.

        And, of course, that is exactly what we don’t have, because of the Brexshit Brigade and the far-right corporate media.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.