A BBC article on Piers Morgan is nearly as vile as him

Piers Morgan and the BBC News logo
Support us and go ad-free


The BBC‘s media editor just wrote one of the worst articles on Piers Morgan’s job loss yet – because he didn’t take a critical look at the ex-Good Morning Britain (GMB) host’s comments. His article glossed over Morgan’s staggering view on Meghan Markle. And instead, the BBC media editor framed it all as part of a “culture war”.

Piers Morgan

Morgan has been the centre of attention for several days over his comments about Markle and prince Harry. On Monday 8 March, Morgan was talking about their interview with Oprah Winfrey. Manchester Evening News (MEN) reported that:

Piers said he didn’t believe that she had suicidal thoughts.

“Who did you go to? What did they say to you? I’m sorry, I don’t believe a word she says, Meghan Markle,” he said.

“I wouldn’t believe it if she read me a weather report.

“The fact that she’s fired up this onslaught against our Royal family I think is contemptible.”

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

His comments prompted outrage. More than 40,000 people had complained to the media regulator Ofcom as of 9 March. In the end, ITV said that Morgan “decided” to “leave” GMB. So, enter the BBC to do some firewalling for the disgraced hack.

BBC firewalling

Amol Rajan, the BBC‘s media editor, wrote a column on Morgan. But Rajan framed it around the idea that Morgan was at the centre of a “culture war”. He opened by saying:

There is a culture war going on, and Piers Morgan’s job on Good Morning Britain has fallen victim to it.

Rajan then said the Markle/Harry story had “turned the culture war dial to max” on GMB. And he noted:

Ultimately, the contrast between ITV’s corporate position and the personal views of their morning star has created a conflict that could not be resolved.

Talk about snivelling. Because Rajan’s dumbing-down of the situation is not far off being as bad as Morgan’s comments.

“Stunning lack of awareness”

Novara founder Aaron Bastani said on Twitter that:

Someone else said:

And as Dan Pettit pointed out:

Indeed. But Rajan’s comments sum up the broader issues with Morgan.


He was still unrepentant on Wednesday 10 March:

Really? As Geneva said on Twitter:

But aside from his alleged misogyny and racism, this is not about free speech.


Morgan has every right to disagree with Markle’s opinions about the Royal Family. He can also defend them all he wants. And he can do both live on TV. But what he can’t do is cast doubt on her claims about wanting to take her own life. A celebrity with a huge social media following and an international platform has a level of responsibility. Pushing a dangerous narrative about mental health is crossing a line.

He is entitled to his opinion. But not all opinions should be publicly aired. Especially when they have real-world consequences. The charity Time to Change’s director Jo Loughran summed this up:

Not feeling confident to talk about feelings, fearing the negative reactions of others, of being rejected, or worse, having your feelings belittled or disbelieved, leads so many people to bury their distress as deeply as they possibly can. But I know that this isn’t the solution; I know the damaging impact of not finding the words to articulate what’s going on for us or the confidence to externally express them, the resultant internalising of shame; that there must be something fundamentally wrong with who I am if I feel like this.

I have been in the place where ending my life seemed like an option.

A dangerous path

Rajan is almost as bad. Framing widely-condemned comments about mental health as part of a “culture war” is irresponsible. This bullshit also gives the right wing room to avoid discussing the actual issues. But ultimately, it compounds the idea that people can say whatever they want in the name of ‘free speech’ – even if their opinions literally endanger people’s lives.

If you’re concerned about someone, or need help yourself, please contact the Samaritans on 116 123 or email jo(at)samaritans.org.

Featured image via Good Morning Britain – YouTube and pixy

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us