In an affront to our freedom, the Investigatory Powers Bill (IPB), expected to be introduced by Theresa May in parliament this week, will give unprecedented powers to security forces. That these changes are buried in a quagmire of almost 900 pages of documents at a time many are distracted by the EU question also suggests a blatant disregard for the democratic processes of parliament.
The draconian ‘snoopers’ charter’ grants police forces the right to look into everybody’s entire internet history and empowers them, along with the Home office, tax officers and some other public authorities, to hack into computers.
The bill itself is 258 pages (PDF) long. Accompanying the draft are 628 pages of overarching documents including codes of practice. That Theresa May seems to be trying to squeeze the bill through parliament whilst minds are focused primarily on the EU question suggests an opportunistic move.
According to Tory MP David Davis, there is “no doubt” that the government is trying to rush the bill, which will be published this week and debated line-by-line on 14 March, through parliament.
Critics have said that the manner in which government is rushing the bill through shows a “complete disregard for the process of parliamentary scrutiny”, and fails to provide time for MPs who will be voting for these powers to properly understand them. Human rights organisation Liberty, which has warned that the “minor Botox” adjustments made to the bill are not enough, also commented on the lack of adequate scrutiny:
Government must return to the drawing board and give this vital, complex task appropriate time. Anything else would show dangerous contempt for parliament, democracy and our country’s security.
Big Brother Watch meanwhile warns that the government may be missing a “golden opportunity” to impose security laws fit for the digital age and that:
In a connected world, where everyone is a digital citizen, these powers will impact us all.
Three separate parliamentary reports into the bill have found it “does not meet the requirements of clarity, consistency and coherence.” As such, a cross-party open letter has been published calling on the government to allow “adequate consultation” on the issue.
The attempt to rush the IPB through parliament once again highlights the Tories contempt for parliamentary procedure.
-Support Liberty UK.
-Support Big Brother Watch.
-Support The Canary.
Featured image via UK Home Office/Wikimedia Commons
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?