The Financial Times cannot believe everyone’s being so mean to David Cameron

Support us and go ad-free

FT’s Managing Editor Robert Shrimsley is shocked, and also appalled, about the scandal kicking off in the light of revelations about Cameron and the Panama Papers.

But not because it exposes the PM’s ‘tough stance’ on tax avoidance as fraudulent.

Not because it provides yet more concrete evidence of how out of touch the leader is with those he continues to plunge into poverty.

Not even because Downing Street’s five separate PR statements over the past week show that they are aware of exactly how incriminating the definitely legal practice of tax avoidance is.

Instead, Shrimsley’s column berates the media and the public for expressing their frustration at exactly how close the PM is to a culture of greed. A culture which directly results in the majority having to suffer. (Did we mention that David Cameron has done nothing illegal? Definitely nothing illegal.)

The column opens with the crux of Shrimsley’s complaint:

Readers of British news sites and papers could be forgiven for thinking this the central narrative of the Panama Papers leak.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

What he – and others defending Cameron and tax havens in general – either don’t understand, or are willfully ignoring, is that our leader, having amassed a huge amount of wealth while overseeing an often fatal lack of care for the rest of the nation, is indeed the most important narrative about this story to a massive amount of the British public.

Firstly, by (at best) conceding this kind of behaviour by his father, friends, wife’s company and other members of the business class, Cameron shows that he has no real interest in making society more equal. It is a tacit agreement to continuing the huge chasm in wealth between those he is and has been surrounded by his entire life, and the majority of the population. He himself is not to ‘blame’ for the life he was born into, but he cannot claim to represent the British public, nor can he any longer claim to be truly behind a more equitable deal for society.

This is not only rightfully damaging to his reputation, but to the mentality of those who are struggling to pay rent, retain their jobs or even feed themselves. The fact that tax avoidance is legal does not make the business class’ behaviour acceptable, it makes it even more exasperating for the rest of us.

Secondly, as Managing Editor of the Financial Times, Shrimsley can’t deny that he knows that criminal behaviour is rife in the business elite. The rest of us know it, and he works at the upper echelons of the world’s leading publication on economics and finance. And he himself lets on to this by admitting:

…the British prime minister’s late father, Ian, ran an offshore investment fund that seemingly did nothing illegal.

If we weren’t all painfully aware of how often tax havens are used for nefarious and/or illegal purposes, Shrimsley wouldn’t have to back up the fact of Cameron Sr.’s offshore activities with the waiver that they’re seemingly doing nothing illegal.

Covering your back there, Shrimsley? I don’t blame you. There’s plenty of revelations yet to come from the Papers’ more than 2TB of data.

It’s not that we don’t care about “the cash trail to Putin” that he suggests should be far higher a priority for us. It’s just that we’re more interested in the definitely, definitely legal cash trail to our own Prime Minister. The one who told us that we’re all in it together, and who literally and figuratively doesn’t know the price of milk. Because we do know the price of milk, and sometimes we can’t afford any.

Perhaps another way of covering his back would be to stop trolling the British public for caring about neoliberal policies – which the Financial Times supports – as they rip our economy to shreds.

Get involved!

Support local, independent media.

And especially support The Canary!

Image via Celine Nadeau/flickr

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed