IDS backtracks again, admitting that government claims about immigration are wrong (VIDEO)

Support us and go ad-free

Iain Duncan Smith now claims that migrants coming over simply to claim better benefits than are available in their home countries – what is called ‘benefit tourism’ – isn’t really a thing.

Since Iain Duncan Smith quit his position as Minister for Work and Pensions in March, he has very publicly rebelled against his former colleagues in the Conservative government. His departure from the cabinet was rumoured to have been a result of his disagreement over the EU referendum with the party leadership. Although he claimed it was due to disagreement over the Chancellor’s further tightening of the welfare policies Duncan Smith was tasked with carrying out.

Either way, he has spoken out in favour of leaving the EU, and his latest interview with the BBC – for their documentary ‘Britain & Europe: The Immigration Question‘ – won’t quell speculation that he is trying to drop the government in it. Again, he’s gone back on the government line he himself expressed during his time as a minister.

Duncan Smith says in the interview that “it’s hard to nail down the figures” and that he’d seen “somebody say that most people in the Eastern Europe didn’t actually know what the benefits are here, so [he’s] a little ambivalent” about it. The Mirror has hinted that these latest statements may, however, simply be a jibe at the Prime Minister. Cameron wants the public to vote Remain, and “has cited controls on access to benefits as a key part of how he would control immigration if Britain remains in the EU”.

Duncan Smith can’t claim this isn’t a massive U-turn. Many times he explicitly stated that ‘benefit tourism’ was, in fact, a huge issue facing the UK economy and, by extension, the public. The Mirror notes that he previously said:

  • Migrants coming to the UK to claim benefits “could cost British taxpayers tens of billions of pounds”
  • Southern and Eastern Europeans were coming to the UK to sell the Big Issue, then claim in-work benefits
  • That the BBC wasn’t reflecting the “great deal of public concern” or “the government’s view” that there were so many migrants claiming benefits
  • That migrants coming to Britain might be “picking the country [they] could claim the most benefits in”

It’s hard to know exactly what Duncan Smith really believes. Perhaps he had to toe the party line as a minister, and never really believed what he was saying. But this would amount to years of bare-faced lying to the public. Or maybe he simply changed his mind about ‘benefit tourism’. In this case, we should question the reliability of the information that ministers in government receive when making the policies that affect our lives.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

In other words, Duncan Smith’s turnaround on benefit issues is not only intriguing, but also worrisome and telling.

It demonstrates the irrelevance of so much mainstream political debate today. How can we ever be sure what information is reliable, and which people in power are being sincere?

This is all compounded by the fact that many think tanks and institutes producing research and reports on government policy issues are partisan, affiliated to one particular political party or set of ideas. Therefore, their results are often informed by the boundaries and limitations of what they’d like the results to be.

At the very least, we need politicians with integrity – to cut through the complex fog of data and predictions, and enact some truly beneficial policy-making.

Get involved!

Watch the BBC’s series of documentaries in the run-up to the referendum.

Check the facts about Europe at FullFact.

Read The Canary’s articles about the referendum, and benefits.

Image via screenshot – BBC.

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed