IDS backtracks again, admitting that government claims about immigration are wrong (VIDEO)

Elizabeth Mizon

Iain Duncan Smith now claims that migrants coming over simply to claim better benefits than are available in their home countries – what is called ‘benefit tourism’ – isn’t really a thing.

Since Iain Duncan Smith quit his position as Minister for Work and Pensions in March, he has very publicly rebelled against his former colleagues in the Conservative government. His departure from the cabinet was rumoured to have been a result of his disagreement over the EU referendum with the party leadership. Although he claimed it was due to disagreement over the Chancellor’s further tightening of the welfare policies Duncan Smith was tasked with carrying out.

Either way, he has spoken out in favour of leaving the EU, and his latest interview with the BBC – for their documentary ‘Britain & Europe: The Immigration Question‘ – won’t quell speculation that he is trying to drop the government in it. Again, he’s gone back on the government line he himself expressed during his time as a minister.

Duncan Smith says in the interview that “it’s hard to nail down the figures” and that he’d seen “somebody say that most people in the Eastern Europe didn’t actually know what the benefits are here, so [he’s] a little ambivalent” about it. The Mirror has hinted that these latest statements may, however, simply be a jibe at the Prime Minister. Cameron wants the public to vote Remain, and “has cited controls on access to benefits as a key part of how he would control immigration if Britain remains in the EU”.

Duncan Smith can’t claim this isn’t a massive U-turn. Many times he explicitly stated that ‘benefit tourism’ was, in fact, a huge issue facing the UK economy and, by extension, the public. The Mirror notes that he previously said:

  • Migrants coming to the UK to claim benefits “could cost British taxpayers tens of billions of pounds”
  • Southern and Eastern Europeans were coming to the UK to sell the Big Issue, then claim in-work benefits
  • That the BBC wasn’t reflecting the “great deal of public concern” or “the government’s view” that there were so many migrants claiming benefits
  • That migrants coming to Britain might be “picking the country [they] could claim the most benefits in”

It’s hard to know exactly what Duncan Smith really believes. Perhaps he had to toe the party line as a minister, and never really believed what he was saying. But this would amount to years of bare-faced lying to the public. Or maybe he simply changed his mind about ‘benefit tourism’. In this case, we should question the reliability of the information that ministers in government receive when making the policies that affect our lives.

In other words, Duncan Smith’s turnaround on benefit issues is not only intriguing, but also worrisome and telling.

It demonstrates the irrelevance of so much mainstream political debate today. How can we ever be sure what information is reliable, and which people in power are being sincere?

This is all compounded by the fact that many think tanks and institutes producing research and reports on government policy issues are partisan, affiliated to one particular political party or set of ideas. Therefore, their results are often informed by the boundaries and limitations of what they’d like the results to be.

At the very least, we need politicians with integrity – to cut through the complex fog of data and predictions, and enact some truly beneficial policy-making.

Get involved!

Watch the BBC’s series of documentaries in the run-up to the referendum.

Check the facts about Europe at FullFact.

Read The Canary’s articles about the referendum, and benefits.

Image via screenshot – BBC.

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed