There are rumours going around that a Leave vote might not actually result in Britain leaving the EU. Surely, this is just a last ditch attempt at scaremongering?
That may be the intentions of some. But legally, it is entirely possible.
The legislation drawn up for the EU referendum outlines no legal obligation for the government to follow the outcome of the vote – rather, it is an “advisory” rather than a “mandatory” directive by the people of Britain to their government. The current leader of which has led an unwavering campaign for a remain vote.
David Allen Green at the Financial Times explains that the government would have several options for diverting the country from a leave vote. They may attempt:
to explain it away and characterise it in terms that it has no credibility or binding effect (low turnout may be such an excuse). Or they could say it is now a matter for parliament, and then endeavour to win the parliamentary vote. Or ministers could try to re-negotiate another deal and put that to another referendum. There is, after all, a tradition of EU member states repeating referendums on EU-related matters until voters eventually vote the “right” way.
The Lisbon Treaty, the EU’s latest constitutional agreement in place since 2009, provided for the first time a method by which a member state can leave the union. This is known as Article 50, and once invoked this is the legal trigger for the mechanisms by which the UK might exit the union. Article 50 says:
- We must notify the European Council of our desire to leave, “in accordance with our own constitutional requirements” (remember: there isn’t a legal requirement).
- The union then negotiates the terms of an exit with the state (us) – and note the placement of ‘the union’ in front of the exiting ‘state’ in the negotiation process.
- The decision will be “concluded” by the European Council after “obtaining consent from the European Parliament”.
- European Treaties stop applying to us – i.e. we have left the EU – once the negotiation is finalised, or 2 years after notifying the Council of our desire to leave, whichever is sooner (unless everyone unanimously agrees to extend that period).
- While this negotiation is going on, we do not participate in any European Council decisions.
So, if we vote leave, there is no legal guarantee that the government will invoke Article 50. If the government does invoke Article 50, there is no guarantee that Britain, a single member state, has any significant power to decide what our relationship to the other 27 member states of the union will be. It’s argued that in an attempt to protect the union, the EU may even make an example of the UK. Charles Grant of the Centre for European Reform wrote in The Telegraph:
…in the subsequent negotiations, Britain’s partners will be certain to drive a hard bargain and make the British sweat. None of them wants the UK to been seen as happy or successful when it has left the EU.
It’s possible that for this reason, or in the event of a remain vote – or for any other reason for that matter – the government could call another referendum on the details of our relationship with the EU. However, this would be far more complicated, which is likely why this didn’t happen in the first place. But if the British people are really given the opportunity of choosing our relationship to the EU, they need to be provided and trusted with far more nuanced information.
A yes/no vote is reductive as it is, even without the various complications and legal ambiguities of the referendum. In the future, the government must deliver more political transparency, display more honesty about the realities of such decisions, and trust in the British public to respond to them. To be effective, similar approaches by the media must be demanded.
The debasing of political debate has become fully apparent over this issue. The mudslinging fear-match of the referendum may have even been a factor in the murder of an MP. We have not fully survived it intact. Hopefully, we will be able to survive a new relationship to Europe intact, whatever that looks like, in or out.
Check the facts on Europe at Full Fact.
Image via Nicholas Raymond
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?