Read Labour’s full complaint to the BBC as tensions flare over Panorama’s antisemitism episode

Jeremy Corbyn and BBC Panorama logo
John McEvoy

The BBC is due to air an episode of Panorama called Is Labour Anti-semitic? at 9pm on 10 July. Ahead of the show, the Labour Party has issued a multi-point complaint. It claims Panorama presenter John Ware is “unsuitable” and asks the BBC to “suspend and reconsider” airing the programme.

Summary

The complaint’s main points are that:

  1. The show only offered Labour the chance to reply last week, although the show has reportedly been in production for months.
  2. The timing and length of the programme “both point to political interference”.
  3. The programme relies on “unsubstantiated allegations and selective use of data”.
  4. The programme also relies heavily on politically biased sources.
  5. The programme cannot be understood as anything other than political interference without an equivalent investigation into Conservative Islamophobia. Recent polling suggests Islamophobia is rife within the Tory ranks. (The Conservative Party could also reasonably be investigated for antisemitism and other forms of racism too.)
  6. John Ware‘s “record of public political hostility to Jeremy Corbyn and his leadership of the Labour Party” and past articles make him unsuitable to present the show in a neutral manner.
Labour’s full complaint

LabourList has now published the full complaint, which Labour reportedly sent to the BBC on 4 July. We have republished it below:

Start your day with The Canary News Digest

Fresh and fearless; get excellent independent journalism from The Canary, delivered straight to your inbox every morning.

I write on behalf of the Labour Party in relation to your planned Panorama programme “Is Labour Anti-Semitic?”.

Our lawyer Gerald Shamash will shortly be sending a letter to the BBC’s group general counsel dealing with legal, statutory and wider editorial concerns and issues. We will also be sending detailed responses tomorrow to the questions and issues raised by your reporter/presenter John Ware to Jeremy Corbyn, Jennie Formby, Shami Chakrabarti and a number of Labour Party staff members, which were received by us on Monday 24th June.

Continue reading below...

Both from the nature of the questions and their framing, the public record and pronouncements of your reporter/presenter John Ware, and your prior publicity for the programme in the Radio Times, we believe the programme is unlikely to meet the BBC’s obligations of fairness, balance and political impartiality; shows clear signs of political interference and attempts at undue influence in the current EHRC investigations into our disciplinary and complaints procedures; is likely to be politically slanted in language, presentation and balance of interviewees; and relies heavily and one-sidedly on the claims and allegations of politically partisan anonymous / unnamed sources and Conservative-supporting newspapers and organisations.

In particular:

1) From the framing of the programme in the Radio Times profile, it appears that the answer to the question “Is Labour Anti-Semitic?” has already been built into the programme – it refers to the “evasions and contradictions” at the heart of the Labour Party – without hearing the Labour Party’s response, considering the rebuttal of unsubstantiated allegations or interviewing a balanced set of voices and views. The programme has clearly been filming and in production for many months but has only offered us an opportunity to provide balancing interviews and responses last week.

2) The timing and length of the programme (double the time allowed for “The Race for Number Ten”) both point to political interference in a highly charged and sensitive political issue between the main political parties – currently being invoked in the Conservative Party leadership election – as well as undue influence by the BBC in the current EHRC investigation into Labour’s procedures for dealing with antisemitism.

3) Both from the questions posed and the framing of the programme’s agenda, there is clear reliance on unsubstantiated allegations and selective use of data and internal communications by former members of staff, who are openly and publicly opposed to Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership of the Labour Party and highly critical of him and members of his staff. The reliance on a series of politically partisan and hostile interviewees and informants on a highly sensitive political issue in current domestic politics – without, from what we understand, a range of interviewees with an alternative perspective – shows every sign of breaching the BBC’s obligations and own editorial guidelines to be fair, balanced and even-handed in political controversy.

4) The investigation and focus on instances of antisemitism and their handling in the Labour Party – while reasonable and justifiable on its own terms – will be regarded as a political intervention without a balancing investigation and focus on the incidence of Islamophobia among members of the Conservative Party, particularly in the month when those same members are voting to choose the country’s next Prime Minister. As polling has shown, Islamophobia and anti-Muslim prejudice is more prevalent in British society than antisemitism, and far more prevalent among Conservative party members than instances of antisemitism in the Labour Party. Polling published last week by You Gov and Hope Not Hate shows that nearly half of Conservative Party members hold Islamophobic views. And both surveys by You Gov and Campaign Against Antisemitism on antisemitism in British politics show that antisemitic views are higher among Conservative voters than Labour voters. But BBC coverage has focused far more on the latter than the former. Without an early investigation of Islamophobia in the Conservative party of similar length and prominence, this will inevitably be regarded as evidence of political bias.

5) The choice of John Ware as reporter/presenter of this programme – whose record of public political hostility to Jeremy Corbyn and his leadership of the Labour Party, as well as a series of controversial articles and programmes on the Muslim community, means he cannot be regarded as fair or even-handed on British politics or community relations – will further undermine confidence in its impartiality. In an article in the neo-conservative magazine Standpoint on 27/6/17, Mr Ware wrote that the Conservative Party “risks letting in a Labour leader whose entire political career has been stimulated by disdain for the West, appeasement of extremism, and who would barely understand what fighting for the revival of British values is really all about”.

In an article in the neo-conservative magazine Standpoint on 27/6/17, Mr Ware wrote that the Conservative Party “risks letting in a Labour leader whose entire political career has been stimulated by disdain for the West, appeasement of extremism, and who would barely understand what fighting for the revival of British values is really all about”.

In an article on 2/8/18 in the Jewish Chronicle, Mr Ware accused Jeremy Corbyn of using a “classic antisemitic trope” in comments about Israel and Egypt, and argued that anti-Zionism had “morphed into anti-Semitism” “deeply” on the Labour Left. These are the remarks of someone who has clearly and publicly already made their mind up on the issue of Labour and anti-Semitism.

His Panorama programme in 2005 “British Muslims: A Question of Leadership” was described by a former Panorama journalist in the Guardian as “disgusting”, with the presenter acting “like a prosecuting attorney, not a journalist” – and by the then Guardian columnist Madeleine Bunting as “McCarthyite”.

However robust the editorial process, Mr Ware’s public views and priorities will inevitably have shaped his approach to this programme’s content and interviewees, and will be certain to lead to reasonable accusations of bias and lack of fairness.

Contrary to BBC editorial guidelines on presenters, John Ware’s own personal and political views make him unsuitable to present this programme. As well as previous complaints of bias, including one about a documentary he made about Jeremy Corbyn’s 2015 leadership campaign, he has written that Jeremy’s “entire political career has been stimulated by disdain for the West, appeasement of extremism” and says he is someone “who would barely understand what fighting for the revival of British values is really all about”. These allegations have been put to us as being expressed by others – whether Jeremy Corbyn would be at risk of being disciplined now if he repeated previous things he has said, and a suggestion that the Chakrabarti report insulates him from blame and are in fact John Ware’s own views, expressed in an article on August 22nd 2018.

It goes without saying that we do not accept that the Labour Party is antisemitic: we completely reject any such a claim and will strongly contest and challenge through all channels available to us, any such conclusion or implication given in this Panorama programme.

I trust that you will take fully on board the concerns, objections and rebuttals we are providing, will suspend and reconsider the planned broadcast of this programme in this form – and will fully adhere to the BBC’s statutory obligations to be fair, impartial and balanced in its reporting in any reworking of the material.

Tensions rise

BuzzFeed‘s Alex Wickham has written that, in the run-up to the anticipated show, Labour has declared “all out war on the BBC” as a result. He published a list of the allegations in a thread on Twitter:

In short, the show looks set to be a source of major controversy for some time.

Featured image via screengrab/BBCPanorama

Since you're here ...

We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.

The Canary Support
  • Show Comments
    1. Excellent set of issues that Labour has factually put forward to the BBC , no doubt they will be dismissed .
      However the Wiki entry for the presenter John Ware makes for very interesting reading and I suggest you take a look . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ware_(TV_journalist)
      Here is just one excerpt from his history
      ————————————————————————————————-
      2006 Responding to complaints about another Panorama edition, Faith, Hate and Charity produced by Ware, the Charity Commission in 2009[9] dismissed its allegations that British based Palestinian relief charity Interpal was funding organisations involved in terrorism.[10] The Muslim Council of Britain described Ware as “an agenda-driven pro-Israel polemicist”.[11] The programme resulted in the BBC paying undisclosed libel damages and giving a public apology to the General Manager of Islamic Relief UK, who was prominently shown while not being a subject of the programme.[12]
      2010 Another Panorama edition by Ware, British schools, Islamic Rules on some Islamic teaching in Britain, was criticised by the Muslim Council of Britain as a partial and unbalanced portrayal
      ———————————————————————————————-

      The Wiki entries do appear to portray an individual somewhat biased in his approach and gives real substance to the claim by Labour that Mr Ware is not “suitable” to present this programme in a unbiased and non judgemental way.

      Another point of proof that the BBC is now nothing more than a Govt Tory mouth piece and sadly a Conservative/ Establishment propaganda machine.

      This should be extremely concerning to all in our democracy

    2. Labour need to Sue for this I just watched that appalling show . It was pure and shocking propaganda with outrageous Bias . It was totally engineered . Eerie music that is the type they use when discussing serial killers , slow mo grainy shots of Corbyn a totally sinister style of filming , they basically pictured him as Darth Vader . An absolute utter joke . The establishment are terrified of him , all the media barons are because they know he is coming for their corrupt offshore criminality .. He is the biggest threat to them than any other politician in hundreds of years . I am amazed they did not use special effects to have him skipping down the street hand in hand with Hamas .. The BBC did after all photo shop a photo to make Corbyn look like he was wearing a Russian Hat and then put it in front of a picture of the Kremlin .. They will stop at absolutely nothing . The BBC are lower than a cockroaches ass hole and they need a reality check legally . One of the finest lawyers in the UK the former head of the CPS Kier Starmer is Corbyns right hand man .He needs to make use of his legal genius and take these despicable media criminals to the cleaners !!!

    3. I see that Tom Watson and Sadiq Khan have enthusiastically jumped on the band wagon Speaking as someone who has always confronted racism (even in casual passers by) I have never encountered it in the labour party and it is sad that the party which is the champion of anti racism is being vilified as it`s opposite Tom Watson should reflect on the harm that he does not only to labour but to the cause of anti racism Being Welsh of course does help me understand what it`s like to be the butt of racist comments I know what it feels like.

    4. “Are you, or have you ever been, a supporter of the Palestinian right to self-determination – in other words, an anti-Semite?” The new McCarthyism. Meanwhile, Hunt hosts a ‘Global Conference for Media Freedom’ whilst the most important journalist in history sits in a British cell awaiting extradition to the US where he will be prosecuted by those whose crimes he exposed, and Panorama gives us an insight into the kind of freedom Hunt had in mind. Deeply disturbing times.

    5. I am glad to see such outrage. It is disgrace that the BBC not only hires a well known pro-Israel anti-Corbyn ex Sun journalist to do the programme but Labour do not get given any chance of a reply until a week before its broadcast and, on the strength of the BBC editing that e-mail to completely change its meaning, it can be stated 100% that the BBC would never even have included Labour’s reply or they would have distorted it. The BBC should, at the very least, have read out Labour’s complaints about the programme. I agree with archie, anyone who believes in democracy should be very deeply concerned right now. I am preparing a full and detailed complaint about the BBC’s outrageous bias in favour of this Corrupt, incompetent, lying, cheating Tory Government where they have spectacularly failed to challenge one single thing such as their deep failure to deliver Brexit because Treason May put her Party before the Nation, to condemn the Tory MP Mark Field for a totally unprovoked, physical assault on a peace protester using the most vile, aggressive and abusive language imaginable – instead they defended him. Why Laura Knuessenberg, when Bojo was caught by neighbours in what appears to be quite a serious domestic violence incident in which his girlfriend was clearly very frightened tweeted that ‘Labour would capitalise on this’ rather than ‘Is this man fit to be a prime minister given that he is a rank mysoginist, a l liar, corrupt and prone to quite a bit of Fraud. No, the slant was anti-labour of course. My complaint will go to around 30-40 pages of clear evidence of BBC Bias against Labour. As I am a writer, I know that I can not only write the most hard hitting, well evidenced complaint against the BBC’s political news broadcasting but I have a 98% chance of getting it upheld, based on previous experience. I will send that complaint to the Labour Press Office, the Press Complaints Commission and Ofcom. I hope the Labour Press Office will get it some main stream media coverage.

      Everyone’s comments here are so true and fully justified.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.