Varying coronavirus (Covid-19) health outcomes are the result of “intersecting forms of disadvantage”, including structural inequalities faced by certain communities, experts have said.
A combination of political, economic, and social factors can have “exponential impacts” on certain groups. That’s according to a paper from the ethnicity subgroup of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage). A Sage meeting on 25 March considered the paper. It was published on 9 April.
It follows the government-commissioned ‘Sewell Report’ on racial disparities which was published last week. Many experts criticised the report for failing to recognise the impact of institutional racism in British society.
The ethnicity sub-group of Sage noted that people from all minority ethnic groups had a higher risk of dying with coronavirus compared to white British people in the first wave. The sub-group advises the government on the coronavirus risks and impacts for minority ethnic groups.
During the second wave, the elevated risks among black African and Black Caribbean groups had “attenuated somewhat”. But it remained considerably higher for Bangladeshi and Pakistani groups.
Interaction of factors
The paper said evidence suggests the continued high mortality rates in Bangladeshi and Pakistani groups are due to the amplifying interaction of four key factors. These are:
- Long-standing health inequities.
- Occupation and housing factors.
- Barriers to accessing care.
- Including stigma and racism, and the potential influence of policy on behaviour.
Moreover, many co-morbidities associated with severe coronavirus, such as diabetes, are more prevalent among British Pakistani and Bangladeshi groups, the paper notes.
These groups are also more likely to work in occupations with a greater risk of exposure, such as hospitality and retail. They’re also more likely to be in precarious work, making it harder to take sick leave, or be self-employed with uncertain incomes.
Tackling the problems
Measures addressing their economic situation and workplace rights will help decrease exposure and transmission, the paper says.
It says evidence shows that increased self-isolation payments would assist all low-paid workers. And family members may require further support through food delivery, paid care workers, and paid-for accommodation outside the home in order to self-isolate.
It also suggests introducing workplace vaccination schemes in high-risk workplaces. And adds that incentivising, or legally requiring, employers to give paid time off for vaccination could improve take-up rates.
The paper also said that members of larger, multigenerational households are at higher risk due to poor quality, dense housing. It further said that older members are at risk of exposure from younger relatives and care networks linking households.
A focused public health campaign could help improve uptake in disadvantaged, minority community areas, the authors say. The campaign could explain the importance of testing in schools to prevent transmission into the family home.
The paper also notes evidence which suggests that stigma, including racism, is a fundamental cause of health inequalities. It drives morbidity and mortality, undermining access to housing, employment and healthcare.
A history of experiencing stigma can directly affect an individual’s health and also stop people from accessing care, the paper says.
Recent research suggests some government interventions increased stigma. For example, introducing restrictions before Ramadan and Eid last year “fuelled disproportionate public emphasis on transmission within this religious group”.
Multigenerational households have also been singled out as a source of transmission. This has fuelled division and stress for certain groups, the authors added.
The Sage members said the Black Lives Matter movement may have created empowerment. The result is “greater use of cultural, religious and collaborative approaches to reducing risk and transmission of Covid-19 in black communities”.
But the authors said Bangladeshi and Pakistani groups have not reported similar feelings. And establishing or rebuilding trust in these communities may take longer in the absence of an equivalent national movement.
It is essential that the public environment changes, particularly during the vaccination rollout and with the implementation of local interventions to prevent local transmission or surge testing in areas where new variants emerge.
If Covid-19 becomes endemic in a local area, public communications and media should clearly state this is due to the structural driver of socio-economic disadvantage, and supportive messages should be given to avoid compounding stigma and exclusion, and thereby worsening health outcomes from Covid-19.
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?