• Donate
  • Login
Sunday, July 5, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

Double standards on ‘red paint vandalism’ show who politicians really serve

Spoiler: It's not us.

Ed Sykes by Ed Sykes
4 September 2025
in Opinion
Reading Time: 3 mins read
220 7
A A
2
Home Opinion
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

If you vandalise innocent mini-roundabouts with red paint, politicians don’t care. But if you do the same with machinery that helps wanted war criminals commit genocide, politicians will call you terrorists and put you in jail.

That’s Britain today. It’s absurd. But at least it makes it clearer for anyone in doubt that most of our politicians don’t serve ordinary people – they serve the rich and powerful.

No interest in red-paint vandalism…

My area is currently full of mini-roundabouts which suddenly have the cross of St George on them. Local people aren’t all ultra-nationalists, though. I’ve probably seen just two houses – out of hundreds – that have put an English flag in their window in recent weeks. But it only takes a small number to have an impact. Because there’s no sign the council has any interest in un-vandalising the road markings.

I’ve seen a “standard response” on behalf of the local council. And while it points out that it’s “an offence to paint or make any unauthorised markings on the highway”, it says it will base any assessment on whether to act or not depending on “risk to the asset and risk to road users”. So if there’s “an immediate risk to assets or road safety they will be removed”. But in reality, of course, there’s no such risk. As a result, the response clarifies, the council will only un-vandalise the road markings “as part of our routine highways maintenance subject to funding”. In other words, it’s unlikely to happen any time soon.

I’ll be honest. It’s not exactly high on my list of priorities either. (I’d prefer for Britain’s participation in and support for the Gaza genocide to end first, and then for the government to fund the NHS, education system, and public housing properly.) But because Keir Starmer’s Labour government has decided to prioritise cracking down on vandalism of machinery with links to genocide, it’s hard to ignore the hypocrisy.

… unless it hurts the lucrative industry of death and destruction

The pro-Israel lobby is not the only lobby group in Britain. But it probably is the most prominent and aggressive lobby group that acts on behalf of a foreign state. (Ask the artificial intelligence bots of the corporations complicit in Israel’s genocide, and they’ll say the same thing.) As Declassified UK reported in 2024, a quarter of all MPs had received funding from the Israel lobby. And Starmer’s top team in particular is positively rolling in money from Israel supporters. In other words, it pays to support settler-colonial crimes.

So it’s clear that proscribing activists who dared to paint genocide-complicit machinery wasn’t about the vandalism. It was about what they were vandalising and who that annoyed. If it just annoyed local residents, there would be no real action. But because it annoyed influential lobbyists with the ear of our corrupt ruling class, politicians mobilised the full power of the state to try and harass non-violent opponents of genocide into silence.

The UK’s elites may cosplay democracy for appearances’ sake. But when a small number of people’s voices matter more than the majority’s, that’s not democracy. And the simple story of where you can – and can’t – put red paint sums that up perfectly.

Featured image via the Canary

Tags: Democracyisraelpalestine
Share168Tweet105ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

Britain’s reckoning: Corbyn’s Gaza Tribunal is underway

Next Post

Epstein victims ready to expose the men who allegedly abused them

Next Post
Jeffrey Epstein victims with Donald Trump and Prince Andrew super imposed over them

Epstein victims ready to expose the men who allegedly abused them

Hugh Bonneville

Hugh Bonneville goes guerilla with Gaza message on Downton red carpet

Labour

Labour purges Black and brown councillors over Palestine support, but leaves white ones in place

humza yousaf

SNP's Humza Yousaf compares Israel's genocide to the Holocaust

Gaza mother

The mothers of Gaza: war defeats the spirit before the body

Comments 2

  1. Snuffle-uffle Gus says:
    10 months ago

    Excellent exposé on this hypocrisy – had long been thinking the same. Wrote to both my local Lib. Dem. MP and counterpart councillor a week ago about seeming tolerance of this breakout ultra-nationalistic symbolism on junctions both ends of a road near me – one of which is actually in a conservation area. Not a peep, not even acknowledgement. “See no evil hear no evil” convenience-democracy mongers.

    Reply
  2. Dave Hansell says:
    10 months ago

    This phenomenon is not limited to painting roundabouts.

    Street furniture in the form of hollow steel lighting structures (streetlamps), wooden telecommunication poles, and wooden power company poles are being adorned with flags.

    This might not sound much of a big deal. However, this practice presents all sorts of safety risks. Firstly, because the only way to attach these flags to the street furniture structures is to climb using a ladder.

    Let me first declare my experience here. I spent twenty years on the tools with BT climbing telegraph poles. I spent a further eleven years looking after the specialist engineers whose job it is to test these poles to ensure they are safe to climb. I was not only a USR (Union Safety Rep) I was accredited to deliver Health and Safety Training to USR’s.

    Let’s start with the Electric poles. The most striking thing about an electric pole, carrying electricity cables, is the yellow coloured notice telling the public not to try climbing the structure – because it’s dangerous. There is no means for any member of the public to determine the integrity of the structure of a wooden pole. It might have external or internal damage. Or internal decay above of below ground level. It may be set in the ground too shallow. Either way, when some numpty puts a ladder against an electric pole to attach a flag halfway up that pole, they have no way of knowing whether the pole will fall over. Injuring or killing either themselves or anyone else in the vicinity.

    Ditto for BT/Openreach pole assets.

    In terms of climbing a pole (and I can only refer to BT poles and not electric poles) to avoid accidents and injuries, a ladder must be secured to the pole at both the bottom and the top. Before any ladder is used, the pole must be visibly inspected for signs of external damage and to ensure it is at the correct depth (the three metre mark), and the base tested with a hammer (a dull thud indicates potential internal decay, whilst a ringing sound indicates an absence of internal decay. The work site must be guarded off and any temporary walkway for the public clearly laid out and signage used to warn traffic at appropriate distances. When climbing, a hard safety hat, steel toe cap boots and a safety belt with lanyard should be worn.

    This protects the safety of passing pedestrians and road vehicle traffic, and the engineer climbing the structure. Allowing them to work safely on any plant from cables to protective cappings; cable joints, overhead wires and block terminals attached to the structure.

    During the 1980’s, and this is relevant to the issue of Street lighting structures, the company attempted a programme originally designed with the idea of eventually replacing all wooden poles with what were designated as hollow poles. These were usually hollow fibre glass poles, but there were a few steel and galvanised steel ones. These are still around and usually have a sticker attached with a picture of a ladder and a red line through it to indicate that these structures are unsafe to climb.

    That is why whenever you see anyone from the local council working at height on a street light structure, they will be using a mechanical hoist with a platform. Because, in the case of a street light structure, you are talking about a thin hollow steel pole which should not be accessed by a ladder because it is unsafe to do so.

    These numpties climbing street furniture with a ladder to attach their silly little toy flags just do not have a clue about the risk they are posing to both themselves and anyone in the vicinity. The structure could fall down whilst they are up the ladder. The unattched and untied ladder could slip, and fall onto someone injuring them They could fall off onto some poor bugger passing by in the street or drop something on them. They could electrocute themselves or others. They could cause a vehicle accident and so on.

    And then we have to consider the attachment to the structure. The flag. Looking at what’s gone up where I live, these are poor quality cloth with no reinforced holes to thread anything through in their manufacture. All of what I have seen so far have been attached using plastic cable ties around the scrunched up corners of the cloth to varying standards of security. At some point, there will most certainly be a proportion of these which will become detached in strong winds. They could blow anywhere. Into a nearby tree; wrapped round an electric cable; littering the street; or onto the windscreen of a passing car/bus/coach or twenty ton articulated truck – with all the potential we saw with the Taunton Rugby club firework display of November 4th 2011 (look it up).

    And the purpose of all this is to convince and encourage anyone reading thus far to keep nagging the utilities and the local authority who look after the street lighting to act to remove these on public safety grounds. Because the longer they leave it, particularly the local councils with the streetlights, the more people will be encouraged to adorn street furniture with these attachments. Increasing the safety risks.

    So far, I’ve managed to get Northernpowergrid to remove these illegal and unsafe attachments from four of their poles in a nearby village. Along with a BT/Openreach pole in the same location and another one on the main road of the town. The local authority streetlights are, however, presenting something of a challenge. I am now on my third report for some of these structures in the past two weeks.

    The power company process of a online form is the easiest. BT have a telephone number which appears to be to an offshore call centre. Councils seem to have an online form but seem slow to respond. A post code and address will be necessary. Though, in the case of streetlights, it has got the stage where the easiest way is wording along these lines:

    “Safety issue with multiple Street Lighting structures on X road between junction of Y Hill and Z Avenue.

    A member or members of the public are putting themselves and other members of the public at risk by accessing these street light structures to attach items to the structure – probably using a ladder – on hollow structures which should not be climbed and only accessed using a hoist. These illegal attachments are not sufficiently securely attached and are likely to become detached in strong winds, with the potential to cause accidents involving passing traffic on a busy road.”

    Thanks for listening, and good luck.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gaza
Sports

Between World Cup stadiums and tents of the displaced in Gaza

by Alaa Shamali
4 July 2026
Cape Verde
Sports

Cape Verde national team — A football legacy

by Alaa Shamali
4 July 2026
Unite
Skwawkbox

Breaking: “You can’t hide” — Dubbins challenges Graham to Unite GS debate

by Skwawkbox
4 July 2026
Peter Thiel
Analysis

People power works: evil Thiel’s Ireland retreat cancelled after campaign

by Robert Freeman
4 July 2026
YP
Skwawkbox

Exclusive: YP suspends Wimborne-Idrissi — for event she didn’t attend

by Skwawkbox
4 July 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart