Hi-tech scans get under the skin of Vermeer’s Girl with a Pearl Earring

Researchers have used a battery of modern imaging techniques to get under the skin of Johannes Vermeer’s Girl with a Pearl Earring, but tests have not answered the key question about the famous painting’s enigmatic subject.

“Who was the girl?” asked Martine Gosselink, director of the Mauritshuis museum in The Hague, in an online presentation of new research findings.

“Spoiler alert: No, sadly we didn’t find out who this young lady was and if she ever really existed. But we did get a little closer to her.”

What the 2018 research project did uncover were details including how the Golden Age Dutch master painted the girl and where he got his pigments, including some from the Peak District.

They even confirmed that the girl had eyelashes and she was painted in front of a green curtain that has faded from view. Such is the interest in the painting, that even the subject’s facial hair — or apparent lack of it — is the subject of academic debate.

The eyelashes were not the only hairs researchers found. Microscopic scans also revealed tiny fragments from Vermeer’s paintbrushes embedded in the girl’s skin.

The painting was placed in a purpose-built glass room in early 2018 so visitors to the museum could watch as researchers and their hi-tech machines took what amounted to a full-body scan of the work completed by Vermeer around 1665, which is sometimes referred to as the Dutch Mona Lisa.

The public will have to wait until they can see the museum’s star painting in real life. The Mauritshuis, along with all other Dutch museums and galleries, is closed due to restrictions aimed at slowing the spread of the coronavirus.

The research findings were being placed online, with explanations from those involved.

Among them are scans that mapped the maze of tiny cracks that have formed in the paint over the years. They will allow the museum to use this research as a baseline to monitor the health of the canvas in coming years.

A scanner is used to study the surface in minute detail
A scanner is used to study the surface in minute detail (Mike Corder/AP)

Analysis of microscopic paint samples pinpointed where the pigments Vermeer used originated. The white lead that forms the earring comes from the Peak District in northern England, the ultramarine blue is ground from lapis lazuli found in what is now Afghanistan, and the red is cochineal, made from bugs that live on cactus plants in Mexico and South America.

“It’s surprising how much high-quality ultramarine Vermeer used in the girl’s headscarf,” said conservator and project leader Abbie Vandivere. “This blue pigment was more valuable than gold in the 17th century.”

Vermeer did not have to scour the world to get his materials – he most likely bought them in his home town of Delft.

The findings do not just reveal details about Vermeer’s materials, “but also tell us about Dutch and world trade in the 17th century”, Vandivere said.

Research also uncovered the order in which he painted the girl on a woven canvas with a grey base layer.

As if she was looking over Vermeer’s shoulder while he was working, research with infrared imaging showed that he began composing the work in shades of brown and black.

He then drew the girl’s outline in black lines before working from the green background to the foreground: the skin of her face, her yellow jacket, white collar, blue headscarf and finally the quick dabs of white that make up the pearl. Finally, he signed the top left of the canvas.

“The girl has, sadly, not revealed her identity, but we have got to know her better,” Gosselink said.

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. I first heard about Jan Vermeer and his amazing portraits when I read about the Dutch art forger Han van Meegeren back in the ’80s. He had an arrangement with a local art dealer who would vouch for the validity of these Vermeers (their “provenance”), then sold them to the Nazis for a fortune. The book detailed the ageing process used, and how the same paints used by the Old Masters were produced (ground-up lapis lazuli produced the blue colours for example), and while I’m a layman on art the book was fascinating. One of the best I’ve read.

      van Meegeren was wanted by Herman Goering when his art was discovered to be faked. The works were religious pieces which Vermeer was never known to do, he was always a portrait painter, and as good as van Meegeren was Vermeer was a master so the paintings were not quite the quality of a Vermeer. After the war the Dutch prosecuted him for trading with the enemy, but his defence was he was cheating the enemy not trading, and he was actually found not guilty.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.