Hi-tech scans get under the skin of Vermeer’s Girl with a Pearl Earring

Support us and go ad-free

Researchers have used a battery of modern imaging techniques to get under the skin of Johannes Vermeer’s Girl with a Pearl Earring, but tests have not answered the key question about the famous painting’s enigmatic subject.

“Who was the girl?” asked Martine Gosselink, director of the Mauritshuis museum in The Hague, in an online presentation of new research findings.

“Spoiler alert: No, sadly we didn’t find out who this young lady was and if she ever really existed. But we did get a little closer to her.”

What the 2018 research project did uncover were details including how the Golden Age Dutch master painted the girl and where he got his pigments, including some from the Peak District.

They even confirmed that the girl had eyelashes and she was painted in front of a green curtain that has faded from view. Such is the interest in the painting, that even the subject’s facial hair — or apparent lack of it — is the subject of academic debate.

The eyelashes were not the only hairs researchers found. Microscopic scans also revealed tiny fragments from Vermeer’s paintbrushes embedded in the girl’s skin.

The painting was placed in a purpose-built glass room in early 2018 so visitors to the museum could watch as researchers and their hi-tech machines took what amounted to a full-body scan of the work completed by Vermeer around 1665, which is sometimes referred to as the Dutch Mona Lisa.

The public will have to wait until they can see the museum’s star painting in real life. The Mauritshuis, along with all other Dutch museums and galleries, is closed due to restrictions aimed at slowing the spread of the coronavirus.

The research findings were being placed online, with explanations from those involved.

Among them are scans that mapped the maze of tiny cracks that have formed in the paint over the years. They will allow the museum to use this research as a baseline to monitor the health of the canvas in coming years.

A scanner is used to study the surface in minute detail
A scanner is used to study the surface in minute detail (Mike Corder/AP)

Analysis of microscopic paint samples pinpointed where the pigments Vermeer used originated. The white lead that forms the earring comes from the Peak District in northern England, the ultramarine blue is ground from lapis lazuli found in what is now Afghanistan, and the red is cochineal, made from bugs that live on cactus plants in Mexico and South America.

“It’s surprising how much high-quality ultramarine Vermeer used in the girl’s headscarf,” said conservator and project leader Abbie Vandivere. “This blue pigment was more valuable than gold in the 17th century.”

Vermeer did not have to scour the world to get his materials – he most likely bought them in his home town of Delft.

The findings do not just reveal details about Vermeer’s materials, “but also tell us about Dutch and world trade in the 17th century”, Vandivere said.

Research also uncovered the order in which he painted the girl on a woven canvas with a grey base layer.

As if she was looking over Vermeer’s shoulder while he was working, research with infrared imaging showed that he began composing the work in shades of brown and black.

He then drew the girl’s outline in black lines before working from the green background to the foreground: the skin of her face, her yellow jacket, white collar, blue headscarf and finally the quick dabs of white that make up the pearl. Finally, he signed the top left of the canvas.

“The girl has, sadly, not revealed her identity, but we have got to know her better,” Gosselink said.

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. I first heard about Jan Vermeer and his amazing portraits when I read about the Dutch art forger Han van Meegeren back in the ’80s. He had an arrangement with a local art dealer who would vouch for the validity of these Vermeers (their “provenance”), then sold them to the Nazis for a fortune. The book detailed the ageing process used, and how the same paints used by the Old Masters were produced (ground-up lapis lazuli produced the blue colours for example), and while I’m a layman on art the book was fascinating. One of the best I’ve read.

      van Meegeren was wanted by Herman Goering when his art was discovered to be faked. The works were religious pieces which Vermeer was never known to do, he was always a portrait painter, and as good as van Meegeren was Vermeer was a master so the paintings were not quite the quality of a Vermeer. After the war the Dutch prosecuted him for trading with the enemy, but his defence was he was cheating the enemy not trading, and he was actually found not guilty.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.