The Murdoch Times and the Guardian – and of course the Labour party – are again smearing Green party leader Zack Polanski. The terror they have of the Green surge Polanski is presiding over couldn’t be clearer. But Polanski must stop validating the smear narratives by apologising.
The latest is a claim that Polanski “falsely claimed” to have been be a spokesperson for the Red Cross. He might have chosen the wrong word, as he was never employed as an official spokesman. But he did represent the organisation – repeatedly. And, as usual, there are ‘receipts’:

Polanski needs to stand his ground
But instead of pointing to the record and deriding his attackers, he has again validated the smear campaign by ‘admitting’ he was ‘wrong’ to say he was a spokesman. In an interview on the BBC‘s Radio 4 Today programme, he said:
I hosted various fundraisers for the British Red Cross, and indeed I would go on stage and speak for them about the amazing work they do tackling humanitarian crises, on the climate crisis, and indeed, for refugees all around the world.
I used the wrong word, and I accept that, but I would essentially take words on stage with me and speak. It’s important, though, and I accept this, that they don’t support any political party, and I’ve made sure that’s been taken down.
…I think it’s totally fine to ask me questions about my past. I would also say, in the same breath though, the Times published a pretty antisemitic cartoon of me last week. I asked them to apologise, and it feels some of these stories feel like scraping the barrel to kind of go back 10, 15 years.
The delivery was feisty enough, but all too predictably he handed the media an opportunity to ignore reality and create headlines about his ‘admission’:

Corbyn
Polanski also missed an opportunity to nail the smears for what they are. The Today (that should probably read “Toady”) interviewer asked Polanski how he would avoid becoming “the new Jeremy Corbyn of British politics”.
This was a golden opportunity to point out that Corbyn was taken down by the smears and sabotage of those terrified that Corbyn would make life better for the many instead of a handful of billionaires. That the smears were coordinated by those around Keir Starmer – just like the same terrified Labour sleazes are elbow-deep in it now. That Corbyn would have immediately recognised Palestine and would not be collaborating in genocide and illegal wars like Starmer is.
Instead, Polanski responded that he and Corbyn are “very different people” but that the latter had “really positive” policies on including wealth taxes and public ownership.
Polanski’s feistiness in slapping down smears has been one of his most popular and effective characteristics and has given hope of change to a country in desperate need of it. His new habit of apologising instead is going to wreck that as it wrecked Corbyn. If he doesn’t return to his combative self, he will hand his attackers exactly what they want.
Featured image via the Canary













The Guardian was a powerful actor in the demonisation of Corbyn. But it’s notable that today the lead article in its opinion section is an account of that campaign of smearing (though not acknowledging its own part) and a warning to Polanski that the same could happen to him. It encourages him to fight back.
Another shill piece for Zack from the Canary.
Zack Polanski is a zionist
“From Liberal Zionist to Green Party leader: The political journey of Zack Polanski”
https://www.jewishnews.co.uk/greens-leader-polanski-embracing-outsider-status-on-gaza-debate/
“Zack Polanski’s Greens block anti-Zionist motion at conference”
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2026/03/30/dctq-m30.html
I will keep reposting this until the Canary acknowledges it.
Doing a great job. I would like to see the Canary open a debate on the supply of money. Sounds boring but it underpins the whole of politics. There are several aspects to it but for now, just one: the sole supplier of money in the UK is the Bank of England. 90% of money it creates goes to big business for speculation, which inflates property prices in particular and which, virtually untaxed, does nothing for the economy, while only 10% actually goes into the economy and is taxed. The terms ‘taxpayer’s money’, ‘borrowing’ and ‘national debt’ are part of the programme of falsehoods peddled by most politicians, economists (shamefully) and the media. Those exposing the lies like Prof Stephanie Kelton in the US (same system as here) and Prof Richard Murphy in the UK are systematically blocked from explaining the truth by the media. As is Kerry-Anne Mendoza in explaining the origins of what can only be described as a post war right wing conspiracy.
Modern monetary theory is no more than an accounting trick and has nothing of value to offer the working class. There is no campaign to block its proponents from describing their ideas. Kelton’s work was thoroughly investigated by the World Socialist Web Site which concluded:
“It is said there is really nothing new under the sun, and MMT, as advanced by Kelton, is very much old wine in new bottles. It is the modern-day version of theories that have been advanced in previous periods of capitalist crisis to divert working people from the real tasks at hand. Not surprisingly, it has been seized on by sections of the pseudo-left such as Democratic Socialists of America member and congressional representative Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez, who maintains that MMT must be “a large part of the conversation.”
The way forward is not the false perspective of some reform of the capitalist system via the “tricks of circulation,” but its overthrow by the working class to establish a workers’ government in order to open the way for the establishment of a democratically controlled and organised socialist economy in which the vast productive forces are used to meet human need.”
(‘Modern Monetary Theory and the crisis of capitalism’, WSWS 25 October 2020)