• Donate
  • Login
Thursday, June 11, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

A West Asia NATO-style force could be a bulwark against Israel’s expansionist ambitions

Robert Freeman by Robert Freeman
16 September 2025
in Analysis
Reading Time: 4 mins read
182 11
A A
1
Home Global Analysis
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

An emergency summit in Doha, called in the aftermath off Israel’s 9 September terror attack on the Qatar capital, has heard a proposal for a NATO-style force to act as a bulwark against the increasingly rash actions of the illegitimate Zionist entity.

NATO-style force to act against the impunity of Israel

According to reporting in The New Arab, the Egyptian plan:

would see a revolving command among the 22 members of the Arab League, all of whom would contribute to the joint force, while a civilian would serve as secretary-general. Egypt’s proposal would see its military hold the first term.

Were it to go ahead as described, it would exclude the likes of Iran, one of the nations to have suffered a severe cost from recent Zionist aggression. Many of the other members of the 57 nation Organisation of Islamic Cooperation would also not be part of the plan as it is currently presented.

A previous proposal for a unified Arab military force was drawn up in 2015, at the height of the Saudi-led assault on the Houthis (heavily assisted by the US and Britain) in Yemen, as the Sunni-dominated former sought to ward off the latter Shia faction, which was backed by Iran. Such sectarian divides were an obstacle to the previous initiative getting off the ground, and may be again on this occasion. An additional incentive at the time was the emergence of ISIS, whose murderous revolutionary presence posed a potential threat to the despots of West Asia.

For its own part, the Zionist regime was ambivalent about the prospect a decade ago. Such a project of combined arms could potentially have been co-opted for use against the main Israeli enemy, Iran. It would also have represented a potential bonanza for Western arms companies, resulting from an overhaul of military equipment to be fully interoperable, along with a likely expansion of defence spending among participating nations. A similar dynamic is at play in the potential NATO expansion to former Warsaw Pact states in Europe.

An organisation of Arab unity: a threat to the Zionist regime

On the other hand, a NATO-style West Asian force would have represented a rare organisation of Arab unity with potential to threaten the Zionist entity’s ongoing project of land theft. As an addendum, some may argue an embryonic version of an ‘Israel’-aligned Arab front currently exists, given the unified defence of the genocidaires via Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Jordan when Iran defended itself from Zionist aggression.

However, the context for this summit represents a shift in perspectives among the governments of West Asia, with the recent murder of six people in Doha by Zionist bombing causing a re-evaluation of relations with the butchers in West Jerusalem. There is talk of realignment around an alternative security partner such as China, with the US under Trump increasingly representing an unreliable guarantor of protection from the settler-led Zionist regime.

The US may eventually conclude that its backing for a tiny nation of seven million people is jeopardising its relationship with the two billion strong world Muslim population. It may be forced into the same shift the British had to make in World War II, as its success in the conflict was being harmed by the commitment to its pet “Little Loyal Ulster” project, which angered others in the region. A shift towards Arab placating Arab concerns followed.

The most significant deterrent against Zionist expansionism

The rulers in the region have shown little concern for the suffering of Palestinians, letting the genocide proceed without meaningful consequences for the Israeli perpetrators, but the attack on Doha seems to have focused minds. King Abdullah II of Jordan said the hit indicated a regime acting “without limits”. Egyptian president Abdel Fattah el-Sisi declared it “crossed all red lines”. The calls for practical action to be taken against  Israel came from multiple quarters, with Pakistan’s foreign minister Ishaq Dar also seemingly endorsing a “combined security force”, saying the “nuclear-powered Pakistan obviously would stand as a member of the Ummah”. Potential sanctions such as cessation of trade with the Netanyahu regime were also discussed.

A unified Arab and/or Muslim reaction would constitute perhaps the most significant deterrent thus far against Zionist expansionism. The strike in Qatar has reminded Arab leaders of the extent of Israeli ambition, with the religious fervour of the settler (aka land thief) mentality pushing a belief in a Greater Israel that extends as far as the Nile to its West, and the Euphrates to its East. In the minds of the most extreme zealots, it means rule of anything on Earth that the Zionist bully conquers. The gravity of the threat is increasingly being realised, and a meaningful response must follow.

Featured image via Unsplash/Hongbin

Tags: israelmilitarismpalestine
Share144Tweet90ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

Early Payout in Sports Betting: Why Do Bookmakers Declare Your Bet Won Early?

Next Post

After 50 years, a Bloody Sunday perpetrator ‘Soldier F’ is finally standing trial

Next Post
Bloody Sunday

After 50 years, a Bloody Sunday perpetrator 'Soldier F' is finally standing trial

black mums parliament

From nursery runs to Parliament, Black mums take their fight to Westminster

Stand Up To racism

When Right is always wrong: disabled anti-fascist on far-right abuse and Met failure

BBC UN

The BBC just asked a UN rep if it is a 'Hamas proxy and openly antisemitic'

facial recognition

Met didn't use facial recognition at Unite the Kingdom demo - but did at Notting Hill

Comments 1

  1. Gnu says:
    9 months ago

    A “West-Asian NATO” without Iran is the same as a “NATO without Russia”. Sooner rather than later, the bloc will “Need an enemy” to justify all the military spending. And if it is buying all the weapons from the US, then it is obvious who that enemy will be – the one the weapons WILL actually work against. Unlike the mentioned other, who can apparently fly over the best radars, and fire missiles into some of the best protected airspaces in the World, without even being seen.

    If this is a serious bloc, then it needs to take into account “Indivisible security”, and include Iran.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Composite image showing Morgan McSweeney and Keir Starmer Labour Together
News

‘The Fraud’ author to investigate how Labour Together shaped parliament

by Paul Holden
11 June 2026
FIFA World Cup semi-final against West (1966)
Analysis

World Cup openers we won’t forget

by Alaa Shamali
11 June 2026
ICC
Skwawkbox

US vassals band together to suspend ICC prosecutor Karim Khan for Israel

by Skwawkbox
11 June 2026
Israel
Skwawkbox

Israel hires Hollywood producer to run US influence campaign

by Skwawkbox
11 June 2026
Rapid Support Forces
Uncategorized

First war crimes complaint against UAE-backed Sudan paramilitary filed in Kenya

by Joe Glenton
11 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart