Canadian prime minister Mark Carney has told the World Economic Forum that Canada is in a “rupture” with the US, “not a transition”. In a staggeringly frank set of remarks, he described the idea that Canada’s ties with the US bring “mutual benefit” as a “lie”:
Writer and analyst Trita Parsi was stunned; in a comment accompanying a clip of Carney’s speech, he said:
WOW!!!
Never thought we would hear this level of honesty from a Western leader, and certainly not Canada, given the direction of Canada in the past 25 years. Canada’s shift towards multialignment [sic] is quite clear – and this level of honesty from Carney on Western “fiction” about the old order will be warmly welcomed in much of the Global South.
Carney marks stark shift
Carney’s remarks came as EU nations started to move troops into Greenland for ‘exercises’ that are really preparations to fight a US invasion. But Canada’s military was also doing the same – Trump has frequently expressed his lust to make Canada a 51st US state, according to Canadian Daily the Globe and Mail.
The paper said military officials, on condition of anonymity, had told it that Canada’s military is “modelling a US invasion”. Canadian commanders expect to be quickly overwhelmed in conventional battle, but are planning “unconventional warfare” to “impose mass casualties on US occupying forces”:
military planners are modelling a U.S. invasion from the south, expecting American forces to overcome Canada’s strategic positions on land and at sea within a week and possibly as quickly as two days.
Canada does not have the number of military personnel or the sophisticated equipment needed to fend off a conventional American attack, they said. So, the military envisions unconventional warfare in which small groups of irregular military or armed civilians would resort to ambushes, sabotage, drone warfare or hit-and-run tactics.
The aim of such tactics would be to impose mass casualties on U.S. occupying forces, the official said.
This rupture in the joint defence agreement would likely see France or Britain, nuclear-weapon states, being called on to provide support and defence for Canada against the U.S.
In what is also certainly a reaction to the US threat, Canada is rapidly establishing closer ties with China.
Trump’s arrogance and recklessness threaten the world and are already breaking up North America. Yet there is no sign of any resistance, or even meaningful dissent, from the spineless Keir Starmer’s UK government.
Featured image via the Canary













Let’s not get carried away or ahead of ourselves just yet.
Carney is former Goldman Sachs and BoE. Moreover, as this short clip from only ten months ago reminds us……
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfE0MWUpoOs
………Canada swears allegiance not to its people or a Constitution but to the British Crown and the interests of Carney’s handlers and controllers in London.
And you can see this in some of the more detailed responses to the questions posed following the speech. The same rabid Russiaphobia and the same championing of NATO, along with a certain coyness in defining what Carney refers to as “middling countries”. Which seems to be limited to the usual suspects from the G7 minus the US and five eyes, again minus the US, in the West rather than the Global South.
This Carney’s Army speech is just same old, same old. The more things change, eh!
Addendum:
Some are getting it:
https://www.moonofalabama.org/2026/01/carney-declares-death-of-the-rules-based-order.html
“Carney is not arguing for a full return to the rule of law. He is not calling for international law to be applied equally to all nations. He is arguing for a collaboration of ‘middle powers’ to resist the hegemon. Unsaid is that such a club would likely continue to plunder the rest of the world…..
……Keep in mind that the ‘liberals’, like Carney, who suddenly preach adherence to international law when Trump tries to snatch Greenland, are the same ones who still run cover for every Zionist breach of international law in Palestine.*…..
……The ‘rules based international order’ was useful for some until it wasn’t. As it has now been declared dead one wonders what other fictional concept will be invented to avoid a full return to adherence of international law.”
*Ditto on running cover for economic and kinetic warfare, sanctions, attacks on currencies, bombing, colour revolutions, regime change, kidnapping, murder and piracy on the high seas over Syria, Somalia, Iraq, Iran, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Indonesia, Afghanistan, Chile, Venezuela, Russia, Ukraine, and every other deliberate breaching of International Law since the end of WW2 after the last global settlement.
Carney’s little club, at the behest of his British handlers, will have no problem continuing to inflict the same law of the jungle on the rest of the world as it is complaining about over Greenland.