18 September saw public divisions among leading Your Party figures. And there are very legitimate questions and concerns about this, especially at a time when unity on the left is so necessary. Speaking to the Canary, on 6 September, Zarah Sultana put disagreements and arguments online down to a mixture of ‘desperation and energy’. And she said the unpolished nature of events so far within Your Party represents the authenticity of a process seeking to ensure mass democratic participation.
Zarah Sultana: “obviously people get frustrated”
The interim Your Party co-leader told us disagreements are:
part and parcel of being on the left. We argue, we debate, we discuss everything. And I think that’s a really healthy part of our politics
Zarah Sultana added:
This wasn’t going to ever be presented as a polished, packaged thing that was already designed in some backroom kind of situation, like a PR company that’s already come up with the name, has already come up with the structure, you’ve got billionaires backing it. It was always going to be in a very left-wing fashion where it doesn’t have the most polished announcement in the world. But I think that’s what makes it authentic.
And she insisted:
What we’re seeing is a desperation and an energy
Sultana insisted that “obviously people get frustrated” because “they want things to be happening at a faster pace”. They see Labour’s awfulness, “the rise of reform”, “people who are struggling to pay their bills”, and they “want to change that material reality”.
Jamie Driscoll: “there is space for everybody to come together”
Speaking in the same interview as Zarah Sultana, former North of Tyne mayor Jamie Driscoll “there’s tremendous unity” in meetings online and on the ground. He added that:
on the politics, there is almost no division at all because it’s such a huge space that’s been left by the Labour Party trying to outflank Nigel Farage to the right.
And he stressed that:
there is space for everybody to come together. And you know what? I reckon, if we ended up with a party that said, ‘look, we’re going to nationalise the utilities, we’re gonna make sure everyone has a decent pay rise, we’re gonna come right out against any form of racism, xenophobia, ethno-nationalism, and we’re going to be pro-peace, then everyone’d say, ‘that’ll do for me’.
So the unity is there. I think what you’re getting is frustration.
After the events of 18 September, Your Party supporters will be hoping for that unity to become much more visible in the project’s leadership. Because the left can’t afford more division. Not when the stakes are so high.













Why are there discussions taking place already? Why have I not been invited to any online meetings? Who is organising this? This is not open democracy it’s been stitched up already. I want to join the party. I want open democracy. I don’t want secret meetings with cabals of influencers. One man one vote online now. I will not proceed with a party that is structured like the current Labour Party. Either be an open democracy with the ability for EVERY member to to to local meetings, to go to national conferences to elect all members to positions like general secretary and to stand if I deem fit to stand. This is nonsense open this party to official memberships I want to join.
I think, from the things I’ve been reading, that this is all down to Corbyn’s so called advisors. Corbyn and his advisers, all still stuck in the stale old Labour Party thought process, some even pro Zionists, want to control the new party. I am really disappointed in Corbyn as these same advisers worked against him when he was leader. I am therefore in the Sulfana side of this debate. Get rid of Labour Party ways of thinking and give us a totally Democratic Party!
I’d agree with that, and that the very last thing we need is to be Labour 2.0
I point to bear in mind is that Corbyn will be 80 by the time of the 2029 General Election – I’d assume that he won’t be standing for reelection. What then of his team of advisers ?
Its a bit worrying that it seems to be almost accepted that a bunch of unelected individuals from Labour will be running the show. Its not as though they even did a particularly good job when Corbyn was Labour leader.
Hopefully we may eventually get the chance to have our say – but will that extend to questioning the unelected careerists looking for a new niche ?