For years, the British right warned us there was a war on Christmas. In 2025, the situation for patriots became even more dire when the enemy within declared a war on flags. Tragically, this has now created a situation in which Kent County Council have had to make the hardest choice imaginable – Christmas lights or flags.
We’ll let Harrietsham Parish Council explain which side the Reform-led council chose:
Oh gosh, Reform UK Kent Council has a dilemma. Cancel the Christmas lights or take down the flags. pic.twitter.com/sbkaBwVUyc
— Reform Party UK Exposed 🇬🇧 (@reformexposed) November 2, 2025
As you can see, the anti-flag communists of the People’s Republic of Kent sided with the flags.
May Santa have mercy on their souls.
Looks like Tommy the Sniff and his band of miscreants have succeeded where mythical Muslim complainers have failed.
Christmas is cancelled in Kent. Because flags. https://t.co/Y9MMNpFE36— CrémantCommunarde 💚🕊️ (@0Calamity) November 2, 2025
“This is why we are falling so behind as a country in the global market”
Admittedly, the message from Harrietsham wasn’t crystal clear. Seeking clarity, we headed over to Facebook, but the commenters there were equally confused:


To get to the bottom of it, we contacted Harrietsham Parish, and they provided us with a clearer statement:
Having arranged the annual permit for the installation of the Christmas lights on the A20 through the village, the Parish Council was informed by Kent County Council’s Street Lighting Department that, for safety reasons, attachments cannot be placed on streetlights which have a flag hung on them; they need to be removed before placing the attachment. When the flags were first erected, the matter was discussed with our contractor and they advised that they could install the Christmas lights around the flags without issue. However, with the caveat placed on the installation of the Christmas lights by KCC, this is no longer an option available to the Parish Council.
It is not within the contractor’s remit to remove flags as part of the installation process. As the flags and street columns are not Council property, the Parish Council is not permitted to use public funds to pay for their removal.
We are hoping that whoever installed the flags will be able to remove them in due course to allow for the festive lights to be installed as planned. The Parish Council felt it was important to make residents aware of the potential implications as early as possible, given the short timescales involved for the Christmas lighting installation.
They added:
The Parish Council will not be making any further comment on the matter.
So there we have it.
The pinkos at Kent County Council have taken a Flags First position, even though the patriotic contractors of Harrietsham Parish said it’s perfectly possible for St. George and St. Nick to exist in harmony.
This country, eh?
The real question now is why don’t these lamp posts have a fucking poppy on them?
Featured image via pxhere / THOR (Wikimedia)













The toast used to be “confusion to our enemies” but this crew have achieved, even surpassed, the necessary level of confusion without any assistance form us.
Spent twenty years climbing wooden telegraph poles and a further eleven looking after the specialist engineers who tested them to ensure they are safe to climb. That’s in addition to being accredited to deliver health and safety at work training.
No member of the public should be climbing street furniture, particularly hollow, small circumference metal street light structures with electric wires inside, to attach anything to them, period. It’s unsafe. It’s a risk to the idiots doing this and any passers-by. The fibre glass, metal and galvanised steel hollow poles which BT erected in the 1980’s had a prohibition on climbing for a reason – they did not possess the structural strength of a solid wooden pole. That’s why whenever you see anyone officially carrying out work on a street light structure, they are using a hoist (elevating platform) rather than sticking a ladder against it.
Unless these numpties sticking flags on streetlights – and I’ve seen flags attached to wooden poles carrying high voltage electric cables (the ones that have yellow labels warning ‘danger of death’ for any half wit who takes it upon themselves to climb structures carrying high voltage overhead cables) – have access to a hoist and are trained and accredited to use them, they must by definition be using ladders. Probably with no rope ties at the top and bottom to secure the ladder to the structure to stop the ladder from slipping, and certainly with no gate guards and high visibility cones and warning signs to protect and warn passing pedestrian and vehicle traffic.
Councils and Councillors at whatever level (are you listening, Rotherham) giving out advice that essentially gives carte blanche to any Tom, Dick or Harry to continue this practice by temporarily removing these illegal attachments and then reattaching them at a later date (in the middle of winter when there’s ice on the ground, and maybe even the street light pole) should be personally sued to the point of destitution when the inevitable accident occurs involving an innocent member of the public. (and I’m only settling for that because firing squads are not a legal option).
By their nature, accidents can occasionally be a bit freakish. Who would have thought, for example, on November 4th 2011 that a firework display at a rugby club in the West Country would significantly contribute to multiple deaths on the nearby M5 due to a combination of nighttime dark, fog and smoke from the fireworks. But it happened. The point being that there is no way of telling from street level just how securely attached any one of these flags are. It only takes one inadequately attached flag to become detached and it could go anywhere. Into nearby trees, waste ground, adjacent properties or across the windscreen of a passing car or forty ton truck or a bus full of passengers.
With the inevitable consequences.
Somebody needs to put a rocket up the arses of these negligent Councils and Councillors.