• Donate
  • Login
Saturday, June 20, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

Kids have found a low tech way to bypass age verification

Willem Moore by Willem Moore
5 May 2026
in Global, Trending, UK
Reading Time: 3 mins read
249 8
A A
3
Home Global
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

As a result of the Online Safety Act, many websites now require users to submit to age verification via ID. In the case of porn sites, the age verification methods are supposed to be “highly effective“. As we’re seeing, however, children are managing to get around these high-tech checks with low-tech solutions:

JUST IN: UK report finds children are drawing fake moustaches to bypass social media age verification.

— Polymarket (@Polymarket) May 4, 2026

Age verification as “political theatre”

This issue is obviously a highly emotive one.

Parents understandably do not want their children accessing porn sites. Many also don’t want their teenagers on social media, which is again understandable. These places are an absolute cesspit. As people have argued, however, a better solution may be to force social media barons to clean up their cash cows.

Writing on the Online Safety Act in July 2025, the Canary’s Steve Topple reported:

While the Online Safety Act was sold as a child‑safety milestone, critics argue it’s structurally incapable of delivering that outcome. Campaigners from organisations including Barnardo’s, the Molly Rose Foundation and CARE UK warn that loopholes around algorithmic recommendations, autoplay, live‑streaming, and age verification mean the legislation “will not bring about the changes that children need and deserve”. Rather than curtail harmful exposure, the law risks becoming symbolic rather than effective.

Since enforcement began on 25 July, age verification—via ID scans, facial estimation, or mobile verification—has triggered over five million age checks per day, mostly on porn sites. But this in turn has driven a rapid surge in VPN downloads as users seek to bypass access controls, shifting minors toward less‑regulated parts of the internet and raising their exposure to greater harms rather than reducing it. 

Obviously, many children don’t have access to VPNs – a type of software which masks a user’s location. What they do have access to is things like pens. As the Cyber Express wrote:

In one striking example, a parent described catching their child using makeup to appear older—successfully fooling the system.

“I did catch my son using an eyebrow pencil to draw a moustache on his face, and it verified him as 15 years old.” – Mum of boy, 12

There were other, more common methods of evading verification too:

The most common methods?

  • Entering a fake birthdate (13%)
  • Using someone else’s login credentials (9%)
  • Accessing platforms via another person’s device (8%)

Despite widespread concerns about VPNs, they play a relatively minor role. Only 7% of children reported using them to bypass restrictions, suggesting that simpler, low-effort tactics remain the preferred route.

Obviously the above won’t work with the more ‘highly effective’ checks. Moustaches aside, though, some children are having success by repeatedly trying face recognition checks over and over, because this technology is still prone to making mistakes.

Privacy

As we’ve reported, this sort of age verification leaves us vulnerable to having our private data stolen. We’ve already seen massive data leaks linked to Online Safety Act measures, and as the Institute of Economic Affairs noted:

Back in 2015, the data of extramarital affair website of Ashley Madison was hacked and user details were publicly released, exposing 37 million members. One year later, hackers stole details of 63 million users of a major webcam pornography website. Data breaches are common fare for any firm with an online presence. In fact, in the last year alone, major names like Ticketmaster and the BBC have also been victims of significant breaches, highlighting that even well-established, non-adult platforms struggle to safeguard user data. If adult content providers operating in the UK implemented online age verification, their platforms and age verification vendors would overnight become even more lucrative targets for cyber criminals and state-sponsored hacking groups.

At this point, it’s clear the Online Safety Act has made us all more vulnerable to privacy concerns. It’s less clear that the act is keeping children safe.

Featured image via the Canary 

Tags: technology
Share190Tweet119ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

Selective reporting on Golders Green exposed

Next Post

Everton 3-3 Man City: Doku saves a point, but City hand Arsenal the initiative

Next Post
Man City's Jeremy Doku in action with Everton's Merlin Rohl

Everton 3-3 Man City: Doku saves a point, but City hand Arsenal the initiative

dwp

DWP celebrates McJobs for young people as it slashes benefits

Channel 4's Dirty Business

Dirty Business: Extent of public anger at water companies and regulators revealed in Defra analysis

Images from the Met Gala protests

Amazon Union founder Chris Smalls reportedly arrested at Met Gala

Narendra Modi, prime minister of India, celebrates the Modi-led BJP winning the May 2026 election

Unexpected election losses rock the left in India

Comments 3

  1. TheUnderdog says:
    2 months ago

    “Parents understandably do not want their children accessing porn sites. Many also don’t want their teenagers on social media, which is again understandable. These places are an absolute cesspit. As people have argued, however, a better solution may be to force social media barons to clean up their cash cows.”

    No no, the best solution is for parents to take responsibility for their children rather than asking other adults to stop discussing adult subjects (be it genocide, porn or war). It’s the equal to allowing a screaming kid to enter a stripclub and then complaining the club isn’t looking after your child. No, no, YOU have a responsibility to YOUR child.

    Many parental controls already exist, new ones *for parents* can be invented or formulated if needed. The *last* people that should be in charge of child safety is the inept, pedophile filled, child bombing UK government. Stop offloading your neglectful parenting onto others to deal with. You’re the one who bought your child the device that accesses the internet, it’s your internet they’re using, *you* take responsibility for it. Stop ruining adults’ experiences.

    Reply
  2. Airlane1979 says:
    2 months ago

    “the inept, pedophile filled, child bombing UK government”: which members of the UK government have a sexual attraction to prepubescent children? I’d be very surprised if you can back that claim with evidence. If not, admit you didn’t know and it was a false claim no better than claiming pro-Palestine campaigners are anti-semitic.

    Reply
    • Datniga says:
      3 weeks ago

      Coughs in
      Nigel Farage x18
      Boris Johnson x1
      Tony Blair x22
      David Cameron x19
      Peter Mandelson x6
      Tommy Robinson x1
      Sadiq Khan x1
      Gordon Brown x16
      ALL are parliament members involved with epstien

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Hegseth
Analysis

Hegseth’s tantrum at UK defence secretary Dan Jarvis can’t stop US decline

by Joe Glenton
20 June 2026
Araghchi
Skwawkbox

Araghchi calls out Israel’s determination to collapse US-Iran deal

by Skwawkbox
20 June 2026
Israel
Global

Israel’s petulant fascists are determined to wreck any chance of peace

by Joe Glenton
19 June 2026
Greens
Trending

Greens messaging on Manchester’s mayoral vote needs some work

by Ed Sykes
19 June 2026
Reform
Analysis

Reform just tried (and failed) to get the Good Law Project’s suit against it thrown out

by Grace
19 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart