• Donate
  • Login
Monday, July 6, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

Why Enfield has more Labour councillors than it needed to have

Ed Sykes by Ed Sykes
22 May 2026
in Analysis
Reading Time: 3 mins read
203 6
A A
2
Home UK Analysis
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

Labour lost control of Enfield Council at the local election but, with more coordination and cooperation, progressives could have easily taken even more seats from Labour.

Enfield Independent leader to Greens: ‘If we had formed an alliance, we would have won’

A strong independent campaign hoped to play a key role in taking overall control away from Labour. But while there had previously been talks with local Greens, the Green Party chose to stand across Enfield, including in wards independents were targeting. Conservatives ended up with 31 councillors, Labour with 27, and the Greens with 5.

In Upper Edmonton ward, for example, Labour got all three council seats. But if Enfield Community Independents and Greens had run a joint campaign, it’s very possible that Labour would have got no councillors at all.

Enfield Community Independents (ECI) leader Khalid Sadur stood in Upper Edmonton. And as he told the Canary:

If one of us had stepped down, we would have won. If we had formed an alliance, we would have won.

The lesson is clear, he said:

If we stand separately, we will lose, and Labour will get in.

Both progressive forces, Sadur stressed, had something different to offer in the election. The Greens had a big national media profile, especially considering the wave of attention current leader Zack Polanski has received. But ECI had been out in the community for years building connections with local people. As Sadur insisted:

We know the people on the ground… We are local residents – we came from a really grassroots approach, where we literally brought people along and got them to vote for the first time…

The people that we spoke to are the people who voted for us, and they absolutely bought into the idea that they needed local people to represent them on their local council — people who knew their area, weren’t taking them for granted like the existing Labour Party, who don’t have councillors who live in the ward.

He even added that, in the areas ECI was campaigning:

There was no one on the ground apart from us. We were out canvassing, leafletting. But we never saw any other party on the streets.

‘We have to put egos aside’ to stop Reform

In our current political system, many voters do depend on a national profile and vote accordingly. And partly on this basis, Greens made some gains in Enfield. But even without a national profile, ECI candidates got hundreds upon hundreds of votes from hard campaigning on the ground, and were a real challenger in some areas.

The point Sadur made was that the Greens couldn’t win solely with a national profile on their side, and ECI weren’t able to win on local campaigning alone (without a big national profile behind them). With this in mind, he said:

The goal really is to try and get us together, such that we can then come together and actually campaign together, bring the expertise that we have — in terms of the campaigning history and background and experience – together with the profile of the Greens, and form a challenge.

In a call for unity, Sadur said:

The battle lines need to be drawn for the next general election very clearly. It’s going to be left versus right.

There needs to be a single candidate on the left who’s going to be able to take on the right.

We cannot afford to split the left vote and allow Reform in.

We have to put egos aside and do actually what’s in the best interests of our residents, our constituents, and frankly, our country.

He added:

There needs to be a commitment to do this together. Because we’ve got three elections’ worth of data. So we know where our voters are, we know where the postal voters are. The Greens need our help and assistance on that. Together, we are a formidable force locally. We need unity, not division.

This is an important message not just in Enfield, but across the country. Because it’s clearly no longer time for party political games. It’s time to join together in a spirit of cooperation and mount a strong resistance to the fascists of Reform.

Featured image via Leon Neal/Getty Images

Tags: DemocracyGreen partyLabour Party
Share156Tweet97ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

Unions welcome ‘Summer Savings’ plan but want it to go further

Next Post

Legitimise and reintegrate: Syria’s ex-Al Qaeda president to attend G7 conference

Next Post
Syria

Legitimise and reintegrate: Syria's ex-Al Qaeda president to attend G7 conference

burnham Public toilet doors in the background. Andy Burnham, head and shoulders in the foreground looking perplexed. The Canary logo is on the left hand side.

Shapeshifting Burnham ditches trans rights to panic-grab Reform votes

Bolivia

Bolivian puppet regime and US Pentagon target leftist strike leaders

Bolivia

INTERVIEWS: Inside Bolivia's deepening political turmoil, hopes meet revolt

satellite

UK government throws another £65m at war satellite upgrade

Comments 2

  1. Isabella Ast says:
    1 month ago

    lol cant wait for inevitable “tHe LeFT iS iN fIGHtiNg” statment from the liberals. would be nice if the greens had made good on the thing that gave them any credibility from been an irrelivent nothing party for decades, that been willing to form a colition with your party (and any other independent you would assume), but of course once again capitalism shows us that anyone under it is working towards the same goals even if they claim to be “left leaning”. Anyway would nice if people would learn never trust liberals since they have done this for decades, then add to this greens are a party with the same vulnrabilities corbyns labour had (that been easily cooptable), and the presences of zionist elements with its party, yeah not sure why people ate the crap and decided to back liberals instead of a socilist/anti imperialist movment. But even with this all been said elections are won by vote and regardless your party still has more members then any other party and enough last I check members to beat out the numbers the next 3 biggest parties if they merged, and yes Im sure the same old tired comment of “bUt ThEY aRENt pAyeD mEmBerS” will be projected out, but the ability to vote isnt dicated by money and those people have chosen when the next big election comes to back socilaism/anti imperialism not hack nonsense capitalist trash of any kind

    Anyway dont give into capitalists and if the greens claim their here to support the left then let them be the ones to make good on their statement and cooperate and dont let them use true left leaning people as a spring board to maintain this aweful system which has killed the planet (yes that isnt exageration, I trust the scientists that even as far back as a decade now stated no amount of human intervention would be enough to stop the many mass extinction events humans have set in motion and yes I dont give up cause even if we are doomed Id like to see the trash responsible face justice for that and more).

    Reply
  2. Philip Foxe says:
    1 month ago

    What wasn’t said here was that ECI had made an informal agreement with the Greens but then the Greens reneged on it. The Greens are the ones who fucked it up

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

psni failing to tackle paramilitary violence
Analysis

PSNI slammed for paramilitary policing cutbacks

by Robert Freeman
6 July 2026
Your Party
Skwawkbox

Exclusive: disgusted Your Party exec members call no-confidence vote over suspensions

by Skwawkbox
6 July 2026
Sovereignty in the Screen Age: Why the Right to Digital Leisure is a Class Issue
Sport & Gaming

Sovereignty in the Screen Age: Why the Right to Digital Leisure is a Class Issue

by Nathan Spears
6 July 2026
The Future of Sustainable Outdoor Space Management
Property

The Future of Sustainable Outdoor Space Management

by Nathan Spears
6 July 2026
Deputy leader of the Labour Party
Analysis

Labour’s Lucy Powell targets free speech, not Big Tech

by Maddison Wheeldon
6 July 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart