China warns of ‘corresponding measures’ over UK ‘interfering’ in Hong Kong

Support us and go ad-free

China has said it reserves “the right to take corresponding measures” if the UK pushes forward with its plan to give three million Hong Kong residents the right to settle in the country.

Boris Johnson accused Beijing of a “clear and serious breach” of its treaty with Britain by imposing a much-criticised national security law on the territory.

The prime minister said he would introduce a route for people with British National (Overseas) (BNO) status to apply for visas to live and work in the UK and apply for citizenship.

In response, the Chinese Embassy in the UK said such a move would be in breach of “international law and basic norms governing international relations”.

A statement said: “We firmly oppose this and reserve the right to take corresponding measures.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

“We urge the British side to view objectively and fairly the national security legislation for Hong Kong, respect China’s position and concerns, refrain from interfering in Hong Kong affairs in any way.”

On 1 July, foreign secretary Dominic Raab accused Beijing of a “grave and deeply disturbing” breach of the treaty which “threatens the strangulation” of Hong Kong’s freedoms.

He told MPs the “bespoke” new arrangement to be implemented in the coming months would grant BNOs five years’ limited leave to remain in the UK with the ability to live and work.

They would then be eligible to apply for settled status and would be able to apply for citizenship after 12 months with that status.

As of February, there were nearly 350,000 BNO passport holders, while the government estimates there are around 2.9 million BNOs living in Hong Kong.

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop


The Canary Fund us
  • Show Comments
    1. Funny that The Canary isn’t so vocal about the rights of the protestors in HK. I can’t for the life of me work out why that is. Possibly as China shows the true end result of Socialism, with beatings, political murders and persecution of the population being an everyday reality.
      Also, the right in the UK has been pushing for citizenship for those in HK for some time. This totally undoes the xenophobic, racist label that the left like to portray.

    2. I doubt Johnson is poking China in the eye for Britain’s sake. He’s been ordered to do it by and for the world’s biggest terrorist the United States. Wasn’t Hong Kong always a part of China until Britain annexed it during the Opium Wars, where Britain got Chinese peasants addicted to smack for the drug-dealing lucre it brought in?

      China has more claim to Hong Kong (and Taiwan) than Britain has to the Falklands, the US has to Hawaii and either has to the Chagos Islands. Regarding the Falklands, we don’t even see the same stars in the sky ffs. How can that belong to us?

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.