• Donate
  • Login
Friday, June 5, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

DWP cuts fallout continues as Zarah Sultana slams Starmer over four MPs losing the whip

Steve Topple by Steve Topple
16 July 2025
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
289 21
A A
2
Home UK News
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

Independent and former-Labour MP Zarah Sultana has savaged Keir Starmer and Morgan McSweeney over their decision to boot four MPs out of the Parliamentary Labour Party – all because they dared vote against the government over its despicable attacks on chronically ill and disabled people. It was via the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)-centred Universal Credit Bill.

DWP welfare bill: fallout grows

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer has withdrawn the parliamentary whip from four of his MPs—Rachael Maskell, Neil Duncan‑Jordan, Brian Leishman, and Chris Hinchcliff—following their rebellion against his plans for DWP cuts to disabled people’s benefits. Although framed as discipline against key organisers of the rebellion, critics argue this is a punitive act of political cowardice.

However, independent MP Sultana summed up the malice of Starmer and his senior-most advisor McSweeney – the man who tried to kill the Canary and destroy Corbyn:

A year ago, Starmer & McSweeney suspended 7 of us for voting to scrap the two-child benefit cap & immediately lift 350,000 kids from poverty.

Now they’re punishing MPs who opposed cuts that would push 800,000 disabled people into poverty.

Insecure men. No vision. No compassion.

— Zarah Sultana MP (@zarahsultana) July 16, 2025

Meanwhile, three more Labour MPs have also been punished:

Three more MPs have been punished in a different way by having their trade envoy roles removed

– Rosena Allin Khan
– Bell Ribeiro-Addy
– Mohammed Yasin https://t.co/UsIRQsTUmF

— Serena Barker-Singh (@serenabarksing) July 16, 2025

Starmer, facing what his inner circle denounced as “persistent rebels,” is accused of muzzling principled voices rather than addressing the genuine moral concerns driving the defiance. These MPs had voted to block DWP cuts chronically ill and disabled claimants of Universal Credit – and initially, Personal Independence Payment (PIP).

The herd of dissenting MPs compelled Labour to reverse its punitive DWP proposals—cutting from two sides only to end up abandoning key PIP restrictions entirely. Yet instead of praising their courage, Starmer chose to discipline them. Detractors call this “desperate and pathetic,” a move aimed at stifling dissent rather than fostering genuine policy debate.

High-stakes

It wasn’t low-stakes: disability charities, public figures, and more than a hundred Labour MPs—including Sadiq Khan—had joined forces to oppose the reforms. Tens of thousands feared the DWP cuts would push disabled families into poverty, exacerbate health crises, and even risk lives.

Yet instead of listening, Starmer’s leadership issued a straight-line whip: support the reforms—or lose your status. It’s a move that’s authoritarian, not principled. Critics within Labour warn this risks muting the very voices that once defined the party’s progressive core .

Starmer’s message appears clear: loyalty to leadership matters more than loyalty to disabled people reliant on the DWP. He’s signalling that internal pressure from MPs—even on moral issues—is unwelcome.

Meanwhile, the U-turn he was forced into feels less like political humility and more like capitulation followed by punishment for those who stood firm.

Starmer’s heavy-handed response isn’t just about disciplining MPs—it signals zero tolerance for dissent within his own ranks, even on core social justice and DWP issues. Also, if Labour voices are penalised for standing up to protect disabled people how can the public trust its welfare commitments?

Plus, Starmer’s obsession with discipline now seems to clash with Labour’s core identity—one of empathy, solidarity, and governance rooted in humanity.

Authoritarianism vs DWP claimants

So, what should have been an opportunity for Starmer to highlight a principled stand by his MPs has instead revealed a readiness to suppress dissent in favour of centralised control. By punishing those who stood with disabled people, Starmer undermines both democratic process and moral authority.

Featured image via the Canary

Tags: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)Labour PartyNew Left Party
Share230Tweet144ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

The name of every child Israel has killed in Gaza is being read out at the Welsh Senedd

Next Post

Horoscope today: your 24-hour briefing for life, love, and more

Next Post
horoscope

Horoscope today: your 24-hour briefing for life, love, and more

the Hague Group meet in Colombia

Europe disgraces itself over support for Israel as Hague Group meets to stop the genocide

Rachel Reeves

Rachel Reeves doesn't realise the term she just used is satire for her own incompetence

The Gaza tribunal

The Gaza Tribunal: Jeremy Corbyn launches inquiry into UK complicity with Israel's genocide

DWP Deloitte

DWP just gave a company a £15m contract to spy on benefit claimants

Comments 2

  1. Gregg says:
    11 months ago

    How many MPs started the Social Democrats back in 1981 when they left a Labour Party that ideologically was almost the reverse of the current one? Oh yeah, FOUR. Time to get the ball rolling for a progressive party in the Commons to take on the miserable status quo.

    Reply
  2. royjenkins284 says:
    11 months ago

    DWP cuts fallout continues as Zarah Sultana slams
    Starmer over four MPs losing the whip.
    Q-1
    Mr Starmer why are you GAGING our elected M.P. and making them leave the party are you culling the staff of the Labour party now to
    Pay for your dodgy Party policy Y-N?
    Well, it’s good to see our new elected M.P. looking after residents’ concerns NOT their party leaders mess or bad policy in LONDON.

    It’s about time all party M.P. did the job we public put them in Govt jobs to do which is look after our needs Not their party needs in the U.K. and stopped voting to fund wars or other countries needs with in the E.U. and including the U.S. that is possibly about to fall apart now under Trump rule.

    Voter come local area voting soon on its way for new Mayor -Cllr
    Of Lancashire take note of the parties leader in Govt now that are trying to GAG their M.P. way of voting and place your vote with a party that lets your elected M.P. vote freely their way to help your needs in your area you vote for.

    Also, I will State this why is it just one person (the Whips) of all parties can strip our elected M.P. of having a vote on their party policy if our elected M.P. cannot vote for us public in H.O. Com
    what is the point of one person running the voting way a whip that was Not voted for by a public vote Whips are just puppet for No10 and should be scrapped no one person as a right to rig the voting on policy made by any Govt party that our elected M.P. DO-NOT agree with the party policy M.P. are elected to serve us public Not a Whip or dodgy party leaders bad policy that trash our way of life.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Composite image from individual portraits of the Heathrow Five
News

Heathrow Five lose appeal against convictions for planning protest that never happened

by The Canary
5 June 2026
FIFA World Cup 2022 — Joel Campbell cools off
Analysis

FIFA water ban sparks fan backlash ahead of 2026 World Cup

by Alaa Shamali
5 June 2026
home office
Analysis

Belfast human rights activist could be deported due to Home Office incompetence

by Robert Freeman
5 June 2026
the new internationalist
UK

New Internationalist launches £150k survival appeal

by The Canary
5 June 2026
de-banking
Skwawkbox

Jewish anti-genocide activist Greenstein suffers second ‘de-banking’ attack

by Skwawkbox
5 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart