Trump rules out changing names of army bases which refer to Confederate generals

Support us and go ad-free

Donald Trump says his administration will “not even consider””  changing the name of any of the 10 US Army bases that are named for Confederate Army officers as anti-racism protests continue across the country.

The US leader made the comments days after defence secretary Mark Esper indicated he was open to discussing such changes and in the wake of the funeral of Black man George Floyd, whose killing prompted calls for changes to police practices and an end to racial prejudices.

Trump tweeted: “These Monumental and very Powerful Bases have become part of a Great American Heritage, a history of Winning, Victory, and Freedom.

“The United States of America trained and deployed our HEROES on these Hallowed Grounds, and won two World Wars. Therefore, my Administration will not even consider the renaming of these Magnificent and Fabled Military Installations.”

Name changes have not been proposed by the army or the Pentagon, but Esper and army secretary Ryan McCarthy on Monday told reported reporters that they were “open to a bipartisan discussion” of renaming bases such as Fort Bragg in North Carolina and Georgia’s Fort Benning.

Supporters of disassociating military bases from Confederate Army officers argue that they represent the racism and divisiveness of the Civil War era and glorify men who fought against the United States.

Trump’s press secretary, Kayleigh McEnany, read his tweets to reporters in the White House briefing room, adding he is “fervently” opposed to changing the base names and believes that doing so would amount to “complete disrespect” for soldiers who trained there over the years.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

The possibility of renaming the bases is “an absolute non-starter” for the president and Trump would not sign legisation requiring name changes even if Congress were to pass it, McEnany added.

It comes as the president’s most significant foe in Congress called for Confederate statues to be removed from the streets of the country’s capital.

House speaker Nancy Pelosi said in a letter to a House-Senate committee with jurisdiction over the topic that such monuments “pay homage to hate, not heritage. They must be removed”.

Pelosi lacks the authority to order the removal of the 11 statues honouring Confederates, but is urging the little-noticed Joint Committee on the Library to vote to remove them.

Also on Wednesday, Floyd’s brother challenged Congress to ensure George would not be just “another name” on a growing list of those killed during interactions with police.

Philonise Floyd told a silenced House hearing room:  “I’m here today to ask you to make it stop. Stop the pain.”

Choking back tears, he said he wants to make sure that his brother, whom he called “Perry”, is “more than another face on a T-shirt. More than another name on a list that won’t stop growing”.

He directly challenged politicians to step up. “The people marching in the streets are telling you enough is enough. Be the leaders that this country, this world, needs. Do the right thing,” he said.

House judiciary committee chair Jerrold Nadler started the session as Democrats review the Justice in Policing Act, a far-ranging package of proposals amid a national debate on policing and racial inequity in the United States.

Politicians were also hearing testimony from civil rights and law enforcement leaders at the congressional hearing on proposed changes to police practices and accountability after the Minnesota man’s death in police custody and the worldwide protests that followed.

“Today we answer their call,” Nadler said.

Republicans are rushing to draft their own proposal but are also criticising calls from activists across the country who want to “defund the police” – a catch-all term for reimagining law enforcement, but one that Trump and his allies have seized on to portray Democrats as extreme.

Philonise Floyd as he describes the pain of losing his brother during a House Judiciary Committee hearing
Philonise Floyd as he describes the pain of losing his brother during a House Judiciary Committee hearing (Erin Schaff/The New York Times via AP, Pool)

For hours, witnesses described what one called a “lynching” over what happened to Floyd on May 25, and others placed his killing alongside those of other African Americans that have created a tally becoming difficult for Congress to ignore.

Representative Karen Bass, the chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, which is leading the legislative effort, said the proposed changes reflect a nation coming to grips with a history of racial injustice.

“This is about the kind of America we all want to see,” said Bass.

The Democrats’ legislation would create a national database of police misconduct, ban police choke holds and loosen “qualified immunity” to make it easier for those injured to seek damages in lawsuits, among other changes. The proposals do not go as far as some activists’ calls to defund police departments for other community services. They do, however, make available grant money for states to reimagine ways of policing.

Republicans as well as Democrats have called for a national registry of use-of-force incidents, so police officers cannot transfer between departments without public awareness of their records.

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us