Keir Starmer’s addiction to appointing people linked to paedophilia is insatiable. This morning, he has brought Harriet Harman back into government as his ‘adviser on women and girls’. That would be the Harriet Harman who was legal officer for the National Council for Civil Liberties (NCCL), which was affiliated to the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE). Her late husband Jack Dromey, like his wife later a Blair front-bencher, was on NCCL’s executive. He was then also on Starmer’s front bench until his death in 2021.
Right. While Harman was a legal officer for PIE in 1978, she wrote a paper — later exposed — arguing against the Protection of Children Bill, a tighter law on ‘child pornography’ — child rape and sexual exploitation images and films.
The document did say that children should not be put into sexual situations. However, it also argued that the idea that children would be harmed by such exploitation was “speculative…where participation falls short of physical assault”. It said that tighter laws would lead to:
damaging and absurd prosecutions [and] increase censorship.
Harman wrote that pornographic photographs or films of children were only indecent if it could be demonstrated that the child had suffered. She also wanted prosecutors to have to prove this harm rather than defendants showing there was none.
Starmer’s first act of his reshuffle, after months of scandals over his knowing appointment of paedophiles’ pals to senior positions, is to appoint a woman linked to a notorious paedophilia advocacy group.
Featured image via the Canary













For context, this appalling error of judgement by the NCCL (now Liberty) was over 40 years ago. It seems that the PIE was affiliated to the NCCL, rather than the other way round as the article has it. Also, it appears that Harman was a legal officer for the NCCL, not for the PIE. There is plenty of material around to discredit Starmer without resorting to this concocted non-story.
The BBC has a good account of the PIE controversy here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26352378
Harman’s Wikipedia page has a more convincing account of this episode: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harriet_Harman
DRIVEL
Exactly. The allegation against Ms Harman is nonsensical and the kind of smearing of character that Canary rails against when it is used by the Labour party.
Wikipedia isn’t a reliable source, and it wouldn’t surprise me pedophile defenders come out of the woodwork to try to defend Harriet Harman.
In truth, the Private Eye documented her ties to PIE extensively. Not something one would pick up on from the pedophile cover-up enabling BBC (per Jimmy Savile) or rife-with-sock-accounts Wikipedia (famously adverse to calling anyone any kind of hurty words.
Here’s actually credible reports:
“Harriet Harman stayed silent over paedophiles to avoid ‘rocking the boat too much’, claims former leader of PIE after Daily Mail allegations”
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/harriet-harman-stayed-silent-over-paedophiles-to-avoid-rocking-the-boat-too-much-claims-former-leader-of-pie-after-daily-mail-allegations-9154313.html
” Miss Harman, as NCCL legal officer, tried to water down child pornography laws.”
“In 1978, Miss Harman wrote a briefing paper on the Protection of Children Bill, which sought to ban child pornography.”
“She claimed such a law would ‘increase censorship’ and argued that a pornographic picture of a naked child should not be considered indecent unless it could be proven that the subject had suffered.”
https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-2562518/The-truth-Labour-apologists-paedophilia-Police-probe-child-sex-group-linked-party-officials-wake-Savile.html?printingPage=true
Sounds very much a pedophile, and only another pedophile fearful of ramifications for the Starmer terror regime would try to suggest this is a non-story!
NONE STORY!? Tell that to the thousands of victims of PIE, all little boys, and do your research. I have minutes of meetings, NCCL AGM booklets, notes, memos and actual physical documents that prove she not only knew, but legally defended them when they got in trouble. The problem here is people like you, who do not know what they are waffling on about, and do not care about the welfare of little children.
Harm and PIE is NOT a non-story.
Starmer the muslim-pedophile charmer is a homosexual pederast who, as DPP, refused to prosecute his shitskin pakis raping vulnerable girls in Rotherham.
His desperate attempts to overule a democratic referendum and hand Britain over to a communist EU makes him a traitor. HE SHOULD BE EXECUTED.
Yeh. Him and the nigger Lammy.
Privately, Lammy once was asked what he considered absolute necessities. Lammy replied “loose shoes, white pussy, and a warm place to shit.”