• Donate
  • Login
Monday, June 15, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

Campaigners slam Japanese government’s report on forced sterilisation policy

Afroze Fatima Zaidi by Afroze Fatima Zaidi
21 June 2023
in Global, News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
169 4
A A
1
Home Global
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

Japanese campaigners on Wednesday slammed a government report into the sterilisation of thousands under the Eugenic Protection Law which was in place until 1996. They say the government failed to take responsibility for the procedures.

The 1,400-page report went to parliament this week. It details how Japanese authorities sterilised 16,500 people – including some as young as nine – without their consent. This was under a law which was in force from 1948.

Moreover, the government sterilised a further 8,500 people, ostensibly with their consent. However, campaigners have cast doubt on how freely these people could have consented.

Forced sterilisation: eugenics in practice

The law allowed doctors to sterilise people with heritable intellectual disabilities. This was with the aim of ‘preventing’ the birth of “poor quality descendants”. The Diplomat explained:

The purpose of the law was to prevent people with physical and intellectual disabilities, mental health problems, and patients with certain diseases such as leprosy from having “inferior” offspring.

In 2019, lawmakers passed legislation offering each victim government compensation of 3.2 million yen ($22,800). But campaigners have called this amount insufficient, considering the damage which the policy inflicted.

However, the government report has come in for criticism. Koji Niisato, a lawyer who has represented victims of the policy, said the report fell short.

He told journalists on Wednesday that the report is “largely a compilation of what has been investigated and reported”. And, he said it merely confirms “that it was an extremely terrible law”.

He added that the report:

lacks a summary of why this terrible law was enacted and existed for 48 years, and fails to mention why the government didn’t take responsibility even after the law was amended…

That is extremely regrettable.

Harm and compensation

Japan is not the only country to legally allow forced sterilisations. An estimated 60,000 Americans were sterilised, as The Huffington Post reported:

Most of these operations were performed before the 1960s in institutions for the so-called “mentally ill” or “mentally deficient.”

Victims of the sterilisation programme in Japan have campaigned for decades seeking recognition of the harm they suffered and compensation. They have also turned to the courts seeking relief.

In 2022, three people were awarded damages in a landmark victory. The Osaka High Court overturned a lower court decision. And it ordered the national government to pay a combined 27.5 million yen ($200,000) to the elderly trio.

But earlier in June, a different high court rejected damages requests by plaintiffs. This court argued that a 20-year statute of limitations had passed. Plaintiff Junko Iizuka, 77, told reporters that the ruling “is a terrible verdict that doesn’t consider why victims couldn’t file lawsuits” sooner. She said:

As the government’s responsibility is obvious, I want to see a quick solution.

Iizuka added that the solution should include more adequate compensation, without the need for continued lawsuits.

Additional reporting via Agence France-Presse

Featured image via YouTube screenshot/France 24 English

Share128Tweet80ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

ACORN has been winning more victories for tenants across the UK

Next Post

No-one cares about poor Black and Brown refugees dying in the ocean, so why should we care about billionaires?

Next Post
Titan

No-one cares about poor Black and Brown refugees dying in the ocean, so why should we care about billionaires?

Palestinian killed in West Bank village of Turmus Ayya in Israeli raid

The Northern Ireland Legacy bill is so bad even the DUP are against it

The Northern Ireland Legacy bill is so bad even the DUP are against it

Critical book cover shots NHS

Dr Julia Grace Patterson tells the Canary 'I hope this year will be different for the NHS'

a helicopter searches for survivors after migrants die near the Canary Islands

Nearly 40 migrants feared dead off Spain's Canary Islands

Comments 1

  1. jeff3 says:
    3 years ago

    Why are you pointing out the Japanese. Doesn’t our government also did or still do hmmm

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Images of Trump at America 250 UFC fight, including one of him seemingly asleep
Trending

Trump fell asleep at White House UFC match

by Willem Moore
15 June 2026
Banner outside Spycops Inquiry saying Undercover Is No Excuse For Abuse
News

Police chiefs face questions over decades of political policing as Spycops Inquiry resumes

by The Canary
15 June 2026
Police from Sussex follow behind protestors raising flags at a protest in Brighton which led to Ryan Bridge being arrested for common assault
News

Raise the Colours’ Ryan Bridge bailed after assault at protest

by Willem Moore
15 June 2026
palestine action
Opinion

Palestine Action ban to stay in place as courts rule human rights protest is ‘terrorism’

by Skwawkbox
15 June 2026
starmer
Analysis

Starmer has banned kids from social media instead of reining in capitalist big tech

by Maddison Wheeldon
15 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart