• Donate
  • Login
Tuesday, June 16, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

Labour knew Palestine Action posed no violent threat, but banned it anyway amid lobby pressure

Ed Sykes by Ed Sykes
24 July 2025
in Analysis
Reading Time: 3 mins read
272 21
A A
0
Home UK Analysis
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

A damning new Declassified UK report shows the Labour government’s own advisers told it Palestine Action didn’t pose a clear violent threat. Yet amid pressure from pro-Israel lobbyists, who have significant influence on Keir Starmer’s Labour Party, the state opted to ban the group anyway. This unprecedented crackdown came amid ongoing UK support for the Israeli state’s genocide in Gaza.

Declassified‘s John McEvoy notes that “officials struggled to produce evidence the group posed a national security threat”. In particular, MI5’s Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre (JTAC) told the government “the majority of direct action by Palestine Action would not be classified as terrorism”. It also admitted that “PA branded media will highly unlikely explicitly advocate for violence against persons”.

The Proscription Review Group (PRG), meanwhile, admitted that it knew of no precedent for banning a non-violent direct action group on terror grounds. And both JTAC and the PRG told the government in March that only 3 out of 385 actions could possibly cross the threshold for banning Palestine Action.

Lobby pressure and establishment media complicity over Palestine Action

McEvoy adds that the government was aware that:

a ban on Palestine Action might give credence to claims that the pro-Israel lobby exerts influence over decision-making.

A Community Impact Assessment for the government – from “the Ministry of Housing, RICU (Research, Information and Communications Unit), and NPCC (National Police Chiefs’ Council)” – detailed previous reports of pro-Israel groups and individuals putting pressure on the government. Those wanting harsher consequences for direct action against companies complicit in Israel’s war crimes against Palestinians included, unsurprisingly:

  • The Israeli embassy
  • Elbit Systems – “Israel’s biggest military and arms company“
  • Fossil fuel, arms trade, and pro–Israel lobbyist John Woodcock (aka ‘Lord Walney‘). The former Labour Friends of Israel chair had previously rallied against Jeremy Corbyn from within the Labour Party until his 2018 suspension over sexual harassment allegations, which pushed him to leave. He proudly supported war criminals and railed against the left, even backing Boris Johnson. Then, he received the reward of a peerage and an advisory ‘anti-extremist‘ role, despite having no relevant experience.

The Community Impact Assessment also noted the dangers for free speech and democracy of banning Palestine Action, including that such a decision:

could energise further calls from pro-Israel advocates to ban more moderate pro-Palestinian groups, emboldened by the precedent set.

It also seems likely, McEvoy suggests, that US president Donald Trump “may have weighed in on the issue”. And he points out that British establishment propaganda outlets played their part too by spreading misinformation relating to Iran. But as he insists:

The JTAC assessment of Palestine Action’s sources of funding makes no mention of Iran whatsoever, and nor does the Intelligence and Security Committee’s recent report on Iranian state threats to Britain.

The fact that government officials nonetheless sought to plant the idea of Iranian links, McEvoy says:

raises the prospect that a state-linked disinformation campaign was waged against Palestine Action in order to manufacture public consent for proscription.

Featured image via the Canary

Tags: israelLabour Partypalestine
Share218Tweet136ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

Butterfly Conservation needs Bristol residents to help save butterflies on the brink

Next Post

Zionist lobby comes for James O’Brien in surprise to no one but James O’Brien

Next Post
James O'Brien

Zionist lobby comes for James O'Brien in surprise to no one but James O'Brien

new left party Sultana/Corbyn party Your Party

Yes, you can now join the new Sultana/Corbyn-led party

Lammy Israel

Lammy continues his barefaced lies on arms to Israel as the genocidal state starves babies in full view

Kirklees Council

Independent Alliance MP says “taxpayers deserve answers” following dodgy local closure by Labour council

Group of people at the beach holding Palestine flags and a banner reading: "Hastings Friends of Al-Mawasi". Hastings

Hastings to mount another fundraising walk for Gaza in defiance of far-right thuggery

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Keir Starmer and Andy Burnham
Analysis

Starmer: Burnham leadership challenge would “throw the country into chaos”

by Grace
16 June 2026
Google CEO
Trending

Google’s CEO gets the snub from pro-Palestine Stanford students

by The Canary
16 June 2026
assisted dying Laura Edwards
Opinion

Sinister Labour MP wants to ‘finish the job’ on assisted dying

by Rachel Charlton-Dailey
16 June 2026
ISraeli embassy
Skwawkbox

In pictures: protesters mount demo for tortured prisoners outside Israeli embassy

by Skwawkbox
16 June 2026
Robert Jenrick
Analysis

Ex-immigration minister Robert Jenrick still hasn’t provided evidence to the Manston inquiry

by Grace
16 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart