The government can’t keep ignoring England’s scandalous child poverty crisis

Three boys
Sophia Purdy-Moore

The children’s commissioner for England Anne Longfield has warned that if the government fails to take urgent action, one in three children will be living in poverty by 2024. According to the commissioner, child poverty will continue to rise “unless the Government commits to a bold, broad response”.

Millions of children living in poverty

Today, in one of the richest countries in the world, 4.2m children are living in poverty. Even before the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic, children were the most likely age group to live in poverty. In spite of this, the Tories’ 2019 manifesto was “predicted to create a rise in child poverty to the highest levels on record”.

The coronavirus pandemic has exacerbated England’s longstanding issue of child poverty. Many parents have lost employment, seen their income reduced, or lost childcare support networks. As a result, we could see even more children pushed into poverty. And BAME children, disabled children, children in single parent families, and children in migrant families are set to be some of the worst affected. As of April 2020, 350,000 children in England are living in a household where someone has had to “skip a meal in the last week”. Moreover, the Trussell Trust has seen a 107% increase in the number of emergency food parcels given to children since last year.

Longfield said:

Some of the stories I hear from families and children wouldn’t be out of place in a 19th century Dickens novel. From the children whose parents won’t let them go to school because they couldn’t afford to self-isolate if their child got Covid, to the children who spent lockdown waiting on the doorstep for their school to deliver lunch – the only meal of the day. Or the schools desperately trying to raise 50p per child to provide a morning bagel, knowing they can use the leftovers to feed Mum.

A national scandal

England’s child poverty crisis must be seen in the context of broader issues. These include the government’s campaign of austerity, deep-rooted inequalities experienced by BAME and migrant communities, and the economic impact of Brexit. As evidenced by the government’s vote against hungry children over Easter, and the distribution of demeaning food parcels, supporting the country’s most vulnerable children is far from the top of the government’s priority list.

Mark Russell, chief executive of The Children’s Society, said:

It’s scandalous that one of the world’s richest countries continues to see numbers of children living in poverty rising each year. The Covid pandemic has brought this long-standing issue into the spotlight and it is vital the government does not ignore the crisis any longer.

He added:

We know poverty has a devastating impact on children’s futures. Yet years of under-investment in education, social security, children’s services and mental health services has meant support mechanisms, designed to help families, are buckling under financial pressures at the same time as experiencing a rise in demand.

The government must act now

Children’s rights leaders have highlighted a number of changes the government can and should introduce to help reduce England’s galling child poverty crisis. The Children’s Society recommends that all families who receive Universal Credit – as well as low-income migrant families with no recourse to public funds – should be eligible for free school meals. Russell added:

We also recommend ending the benefit cap, increasing the child element of universal credit or increasing child benefit by £10 a week as well as huge investment in children’s services and local welfare schemes to ensure families have somewhere to turn in times of crisis.

Louise King, director of the Children’s Rights Alliance for England, said:

Despite the clear and obvious evidence of a growing child poverty crisis, we still have not seen a comprehensive strategy to tackle child poverty since the Child Poverty Act was abolished… The government must urgently commit to re-establishing cross-government, long-term child poverty targets and poverty reduction strategies, in-line with the Child Poverty Act 2010, to avoid severe and long-lasting inequality for some of society’s most vulnerable children and families.

The government’s shameful failure to support families in need has damaged the wellbeing and life chances of millions of children. It must act now to ensure that we don’t see further devastating, far-reaching consequences for future generations. It will take a radical and coherent cross-governmental response to give vulnerable children the help they need, and to stop the rise and rise of child poverty. The government should be working towards sustainable, long-term changes to eradicate child poverty in England. And support for vulnerable children and families must move to the very top of the government’s agenda immediately.

Featured image via Tolga Ahmetler/Unsplash.

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. We didn’t have food halls didn’t have people starving but since RTU IDs changed the social security to universal credit it’s proven a big stick to beat the peasants with even attacking those working but many can’t even claim this benefit it shows that over government hasn’t tried to help but to cull the stock through this benefit that starved our people’s

    2. “Austerity” certainly has an eternal life without a hope feeling to it. I really question if England is wealthy any longer. It seems to be wildly at odds with how financial health judged. The children suffer first.
      If you can’t look after your children your in nowhere land.
      It’s official government policy for those who vote, and they are the winner?
      How screwed up.
      Time to cull the rich to find those who think.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.