UK citizens’ climate assembly backs green pandemic recovery and lifestyle shift

Support us and go ad-free

The UK’s first national citizens’ assembly on climate breakdown has backed changes to the economy and lifestyles that will drive down emissions in the wake of coronavirus.

A report shows “striking” agreement within the citizens’ assembly that steps taken by the government to help the economy recover should also cut greenhouse gases and that green changes to lifestyles should be encouraged.

Climate Assembly UK was commissioned by six parliamentary select committees and asked to examine how the country meets its legal target to cut greenhouse gases to zero overall by mid-century.

More than 100 people, who are representative of the UK population, met to learn about climate breakdown and discuss and make informed decisions on options for meeting the net-zero goal.

The assembly was forced to move online to complete its work because of the pandemic and at its final session participants discussed the impact of the coronavirus outbreak and lockdown on the net zero target.

Renewable energy
Assembly members flagged investment in areas such as offshore wind (Peter Byrne/PA)

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

An interim report into its findings shows 79% of assembly members strongly agreed or agreed that steps taken by the government to help the economy recover should be designed to help achieve net zero.

Some 93% of those taking part strongly agreed or agreed that as lockdown eases, the government, employers and others should take steps to encourage lifestyles to change so they are more compatible with net zero.

When it came to government action, assembly members most commonly raised limiting or putting conditions on investment or bailouts to high carbon industries such as oil and gas or the aviation sector.

But others felt that bailouts were necessary to protect the economy and ensure people had jobs.

People taking part in the assembly also called for the need to rethink and invest in infrastructure so it met climate fighting goals, flagging up areas such as insulating buildings, offshore wind, e-vehicles and broadband.

When it came to lifestyle changes, encouraging people to work from home more and to change how they travel were high on the agenda.

Members were keen to see efforts to encourage cycling, making it safer and providing proper infrastructure, and many thought there could be a reduction in flying, particularly replacing business travel with video conferencing.

The full report will be published in September but the interim report aims to inform the government as it looks to take steps to reboot the economy in the wake of the pandemic.

Its findings are also being noted by the government’s advisory Committee on Climate Change, whose annual report on climate progress to Parliament this week will advise ministers on a green and resilient recovery from Covid-19.

As the report was published, the six parliamentary committee chairs wrote to the prime minister highlighting its findings and urging Boris Johnson to make the route to net-zero a joint undertaking between government, Parliament and the public.

Prof Rebecca Willis, from the University of Lancaster, one of the four expert leads for the assembly, said: “The real benefit of this report is that these citizens had already spent a long time thinking and learning about net zero, so they are very well informed on net zero, and they are also a representative sample.

“There was a striking consensus that steps taken by the government to help the economy after coronavirus should be designed to help achieve net zero as well.”

Fellow expert lead Prof Jim Watson, from UCL, said he was surprised by the level of support for lifestyle changes, which he also described as a “striking result”.

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. As long as us motor vehicle users don’t have to stump up for all the kamikaze cyclists like we always do.
      Make em wear helmets. Make em get insurance. Make em MOT their bikes.
      Cyclist road tax via a £25 levy on all new bikes.

      1. Obviously you are not prepared for a lifestyle change. Democracy makes strange bedfellows. Unfortunately, as many placards make plain, there is no planet ‘B’. Taxes from car users, duty on fuel and insurance, as well as the MOT con supplement the taxes not paid by big businesses. 20% VAT is another source of tax which puts the responsibility back onto motor vehicle users and cyclists, who together are the producer’s of big business’ profits. Where do all those taxes and duties go? Why sow division where none needs to be?

        1. There’s always been division. Dirty motorists against godly cyclists. And who started it? Not those sat in their cars.
          And yes I recycle vigourously. No I don’t use my car other than when it’s essential. I know there is no “planet b”.
          I just want those that think they are better than me to pay there dues. And that includes big business and their ilk.

          1. I agree that the ‘holier than though’ mentality is very irritating. I have appreciated the lack of traffic over the previous months, it’s been like going back in time. Those months also reduced the ‘time pressure’ many of us experiece, so that cyclists became less of an issue for those of us unable to cycle.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.