Majority of patients have ‘long Covid’ symptoms seven weeks after discharge

Support us and go ad-free

More than two-thirds of patients hospitalised due to coronavirus (Covid-19) continue to suffer from debilitating symptoms more than seven weeks after being discharged, a new study suggests.

Researchers found that 54 days after discharge, 69% of patients were still experiencing fatigue. And 53% were suffering from persistent breathlessness.

They also found that 34% still had a cough and 15% reported depression.

In addition, 38% of chest radiographs (X-rays) remained abnormal. And 9% were getting worse, according to the study. It was carried out in collaboration with clinicians at the Royal Free London (RFL) and University College London Hospitals NHS Trust (UCLH).

A real phenomenon

Dr Swapna Mandal, an honorary clinical associate professor at UCL division of medicine, said the data shows so-called “long Covid” is a real phenomenon. She added that further research is needed to understand how the symptoms can be treated in the long-term.

She said:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Patients whose Covid-19 illness is serious enough for them to require hospital care often continue to suffer significant symptoms for many weeks after their discharge.

Professor John Hurst, at UCL division of medicine, said:

Understanding ‘long Covid’ is critical in helping people who have been through this life-changing experience return to health, while rapid roll-out of this follow-up service shows how our clinical teams worked together to deliver an innovative service during a period of unprecedented demand on our staff.

Findings

In the study, published in the medical journal Thorax, clinical teams set up a post-coronavirus follow up clinic. This was to review both the psychological and physiological symptoms of discharged patients.

In total, they observed 384 patients who had tested positive. Patients had been treated at Barnet Hospital, the Royal Free Hospital or UCLH.

Collectively, the average length of stay in hospital was 6.5 days.

All of the patients were spoken to by a member of the clinical team on average 54 days after they’d left hospital.

Some further face-to-face clinical appointments were required for patients needing rehabilitation and/or further investigation.

The research suggests that for those patients whose chest X-ray was still showing signs of infection on being discharged, 62% had a normal x-ray when it was repeated. While the remainder (38%) were still showing changes.

Almost one in ten (9%) of these patients had an X-ray which was worse than when they were discharged.

Limitations

The scientists note a number of limitations to their study. These included that the study only had patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid-19. And patients requiring prolonged ICU and in-patient stay may be under-represented in the analysis.

They add that not all participants were willing to take part in the review or attend for investigations, which potentially introduced selection bias.

The researchers can’t determine if these features are unique to coronavirus. They may simply be similar to those following admission for other critical respiratory illnesses.

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. This article is outrageous. No wonder none of you will take personal responsibility. It is a complete misrepresentation and fits snuggly into the wider M$M format of misinformation. The Canary’s ‘left’ self-identification appears not to require any degree of analysis. Being ‘left’ is not a fashion statement it is a claim to rigourous analysis of reality – a social reality that has been forged in the minds, first of peasants and then landless factory and mine workers, over hundreds of years from its aristocratic illusions of superiority fanned by the Church to the entrepreneur fantasies fanned by economists. This isn’t playtime. Didn’t 2019 provide enough reason to wake up?

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.