• Donate
  • Login
Friday, July 10, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

We should not allow assisted dying to sacrifice disabled people on the altar of the economy

The Canary by The Canary
17 September 2024
in Editorial
Reading Time: 4 mins read
206 2
A A
1
Home Editorial
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

Prime minister Keir Starmer appears to be gearing up to fast-track new legislation to legalise assisted dying. This could see parliament holding a vote within weeks on this. However, the bill remains highly controversial – namely for the enormous danger it poses to chronically ill and disabled people.

Assisted dying: Starmer to fast-track bill

Currently, it is a criminal offence in the UK to aid someone in taking their own life via assisted dying – also known as assisted suicide or voluntary euthanasia. However, this could be about to change – and fast. The private members ‘Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults Bills [HL]‘ would allow terminally ill adults with a life expectancy of less than six months to seek medical assistance to end their own life.

Now, as News Hub has reported:

Keir Starmer is privately preparing to push the legislation through by Christmas, much sooner than initially thought.

Moreover, it detailed that:

 Although Sir Keir Starmer had avoided setting a specific timescale for a vote, a successful Private Members’ Bill ballot, which enables backbench MPs to introduce legislation, has sped up the process.

Supporters of the bill have argued that giving terminally ill patients the choice to end their life is the empathetic and right thing to do.

However, many also oppose the bill. Notably, many chronic illness and disabled campaigners have repeatedly resisted and spoken out against it.

This is because, in a system that predominantly demonises chronically ill and disabled people, they argue it is a slippery slope.

Crucially, this has been the case in other countries that have legalised it. While the current bill would legalise assisted dying for terminally ill people only at this point, it could pave the way to expanding the provision. And it could do this to dangerous effect.

The Netherlands extended assisted dying to people with mental health problems, including children.

Meanwhile, Canada extended its medically assisted in death (MAID) policy to chronically ill and disabled people. Most alarmingly, Canada offers this as an option to those who cannot afford care. There are anecdotal accounts of poverty and a lack of healthcare options driving disabled people to take their lives under MAID.

All for the economy

Moreover, even without these extensions, the current bill already plays into problematic narratives. Specifically, this is the idea that terminally ill patients are a drain on the economy.

In fact, as the Canary’s Steve Topple previously highlighted, the poorly-worded framing of one such petition used this argument. Until change.org removed it due to an influx of complaints, this read:

For those without compassion and reading this asking what the benefit besides letting people end things on their own terms, perhaps look at this as a way to save the NHS and DWP millions of pounds every year.

Of course, if that rhetoric is also familiar, that’s because it should be. It’s this precise message that has been on the lips of DWP boss Liz Kendall as she has declared her war against the post-pandemic “economic inactivity” of long-term sick people.

And behind the back-to-work bluster on reducing the benefits bill is the implication that chronically ill and disabled people cost too much money to support.

Already, we’re seeing the results of this callous economy first mantra. First, Labour refused to scrap the two child limit on benefits that’s entrenching staggering levels of poverty.

Then, it cut the winter fuel payment for millions of pensioners. It did this knowing it would likely kill thousands of elderly people this winter, as shown by the party’s previous estimations. Even the government’s own equality analysis identified how this will disproportionately harm disabled people. Specifically, it will cause 1.6 million of them to lose out on the vital support.

What’s more, Labour is also staying wedded to a Tory-esque sanction regime for social security. The Tory-led DWP’s ruthlessly punitive benefit system has caused tens of thousands of deaths on its watch. Now, Labour look set to pick up where the Conservatives left off with this.

In other words, Labour is implementing all these deadly policies in the name of saving money. Therefore, it’s easy to see how the government and right-wing actors that equate dignity with work, will push dignity in dying for those who can’t.

No safe assisted deaths in a cruel, capitalist system

The reality right now is that while the government and NHS are failing to provide access to adequate care, legalising assisted dying will put chronically ill and disabled people at risk. So long as that same system continues to vilify them, there’s every chance it’ll directly – or subliminally – push people to end their lives.

In a compassionate, caring society, terminally ill people could choose to die with dignity. At the same, chronically ill and disabled people would have sufficient medical research, treatments, and support to live with dignity.

There’d be no danger that the government or healthcare system would coerce them to end their lives. Currently however, we live in a cruel, capitalist society where it’s perfectly plausible that could happen.

Featured image via the Canary

Tags: chronic illnessdisabilityLabour Party
Share154Tweet97ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

DWP sanctions under Universal Credit are now institutionally racist

Next Post

Labour MP deletes tweets saying it’s older people’s “choice” not to put heating on

Next Post
Peter Lamb winter fuel payments

Labour MP deletes tweets saying it's older people's "choice" not to put heating on

Starmer Abbott

Keir Starmer gaslights Diane Abbott after she says he treated her as a "non person"

Israel German Gaza

German media just came together to slam Israel over it not letting journalists into Gaza.

Israel Lebanon Hezbollah pagers

Terrorists blow up multiple explosives in major international city... unless you're Israel, then its 'self defence'

Real-Time Price Monitoring in Retail: Best Practices to Maximise Profits

Real-Time Price Monitoring in Retail: Best Practices to Maximise Profits

Comments 1

  1. David Willetts says:
    2 years ago

    Arguments about saving money paint and ugly picture, and they always centre on spending as a black hole into which money disappears. Every pound the govt spends not only creates that very pound, it also becomes someone else’s income. Money doesn’t just disappear, until it’s paid in tax. When people talk about “saving money” they use the term as an abstraction, however, money spent is a measure of activity. That money might represent activity to make guns, or ultra-processed food, or some worthless plastic shit. It might also represent care provided, help offered, and so on. If the government keeps “saving money in every area” the economy will simply shrink by the saved amount. For instance if the government spends £900 billion instead of £1 trillion this year, the economy will likely be £100 billion smaller, plus whatever knock-on effects that reduction leads to. This is the problem with austerity, it applies microeconomic thinking – I have to be careful what I spend as I may end up destitute – with macroeconomic reality – money moves around, it doesn’t disappear just because I’ve spent it. It also shows how people can’t distinguish between themselves as individuals, who aren’t allowed to create money, and sovereign states that create money every time they spend.
    When people talk about efficiency, savings, cost-effectiveness and so on, these are usually euphemisms for callousness and cruelty.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Farage
Skwawkbox

Farage ‘routinely’ introduced criminal donor Cottrell as ‘chief of staff’

by Skwawkbox
9 July 2026
Israel
Global

Netanyahu says Israel will occupy Lebanon for as long as they ‘need’

by Joe Glenton
9 July 2026
Burnham
Analysis

Andy Burnham offers milquetoast sop to Palestine. Sadly for him we weren’t born yesterday

by Joe Glenton
9 July 2026
Burnham
Analysis

The next PM must act on the interim Timms Report and scrap the DWP’s PIP assessment system

by Grace
9 July 2026
FAI
Analysis

Irish football bosses continue Israel appeasement with vote to fulfil fixtures

by Robert Freeman
9 July 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart