We’ve had to investigate the Canary’s own toxic environment

Support us and go ad-free

This article is part of a series about the workers’ revolution which led to the Canary becoming the Canary Workers’ Co-op. You can read all the articles in the series here and visit our new, dedicated page here

The Canary has always had a hierarchical management system. It’s a system that’s never sat right with a lot of us who come from activist backgrounds. For many of us, breaking down power structures is a fundamental part of our political work, so it always seemed at odds with our values that this was the way we worked.

In order to address this, in late 2021 a group of us started the process of transitioning to a horizontal structure. Through this, several of us started to have conversations about how we’d like to see the Canary become a workers’ co-operative.

However, we never realised, or expected, that this would lead us to become the canaries in our own coal mine. We’ve had to sound the alarm and take action against our own toxic work environment.

Gross inequalities, gross irregularities

Following the departure of a former director earlier in the year, staff members were given access to previously restricted systems. Alongside access to information given by another at-the-time remaining director, we were able to start unravelling the gross inequalities and gross mismanagement that was rampant in the company.

Even by the standards of corporate capitalist criminals, the Canary finances and systems were a mess. Our latest set of official accounts were a veritable clusterfuck of irregularities. And who knew that managing a membership database involved doing no management at all? The three former directors created a culture of hierarchy and narcissism. The physical manifestation of this was a business that was chaotic and collapsing.

Not only was the Canary being run as a corporate capitalist entity with directors receiving far more in wages and benefits than other staff members, it was also being done incompetently, with potentially multiple breaches of companies law.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

To say we are disgusted and enraged is an understatement. Everything we found out fundamentally goes against who we are politically. It goes against the aims, values, and mission that we promote. It’s a betrayal that we’re still reeling from.

It all started with the dividend payments

One of the first things we discovered was that the directors had been receiving dividend payments for years. Some directors had historically been paid solely via dividends, and more recently, all of the directors had their wages made up via dividend payments. This ensured that their salaries were kept under the tax threshold. This is because dividend payments attract a much lower rate of tax than income tax. National insurance is also not payable on dividend payments.

In itself, this is legal. It is a standard tactic employed by company directors to avoid tax. However, this meant that the directors’ gross pay was far higher than was stated internally and externally. It meant that the commitment that the Canary only had a pound difference between its different pay structures, especially when sick pay was factored in, wasn’t worth the paper it was written on. This could have been a moral rather than a legal issue.

However, these dividends weren’t legally paid. There are strict rules for dividend payments – partly set out through the Companies Act 2006, and partly through a company’s Articles of Association. The Articles are a legal document – otherwise known as a constitution – written on behalf of a company, which sets out the rules for how the business is run. There are also what are known as “model articles” if you don’t want to write your own – these are what the Canary used.

The Companies Act 2006 states that:

A director of a company must act in accordance with the company’s constitution.

The Canary‘s articles state that:

The company may by ordinary resolution declare dividends and the directors may decide to pay interim dividends.


No dividend may be declared unless it is in accordance with shareholders’ respective rights.

Since the Canary was founded in 2015, and until we held one this summer, there have been no recorded meetings of shareholders. Furthermore, no resolutions have ever been submitted to shareholders. The dividends paid to the directors were therefore never declared to the shareholders, and they are consequently classed as illegal dividends.

Somehow, it gets worse. At the time, there were several other shareholders of Canary Media Limited. This included current and former staff members. However, shareholders who weren’t directors didn’t receive any dividend payments. And, even amongst themselves, the three directors didn’t receive equal payments despite having an equal number of shares.

This is contrary to yet another part of the Canary’s articles:

Unless the shareholders’ resolution to declare a director’s decision to pay a dividend, or the terms on which shares are issued specify otherwise, it must be paid by reference to each shareholders’ holding of the shares on the date of the resolution or decision to pay it.

In other words, legally, all of the shareholders should have been treated equally. They blatantly weren’t.

The shareholders who weren’t directors were minority shareholders, and so wouldn’t have been able to block the declaration of dividends. However, many of us would have sounded the alarm, and we would have realised how dodgy this looked.

The tip of the iceberg

Unfortunately, finding the unlawful dividend payments was just the tip of the iceberg. Other irregularities we found include:

  • Director’s loans that were issued without a shareholder resolution and not paid back, contrary to S197, Companies Act 2006.
  • A £6k loss of office payment to a former director, again made without a shareholder resolution, contrary to S217, Companies Act 2006.
  • Paying VAT incorrectly since 2018.
  • Directors not having contracts and not logging sick days or leave – all of which were paid at full pay.
  • Calculating and paying Corporation Tax incorrectly since 2018.

This all leads to a breach of S174 of the Companies Act 2006, a director’s duty to “exercise reasonable skill, care and diligence”


We’ve spent countless hours delving through our records to identify the issues and checking our conclusions with accountants and lawyers. We quickly realised that we needed to take action to put things right – morally and legally. Those of us involved in this work also realised that it meant we’d become de-facto directors, and therefore had legal obligations to the company and the government as a result.

The first ever shareholders’ meeting was called, and all shareholders were informed of the financial and legal position of the company. A resolution was passed that directors could not be shareholders and vice versa. All shareholders agreed to gift their shares to staff members, and a resolution of intent was made for all of these shares to go to the co-op.

However, we are still left owing tens of thousands of pounds in unpaid VAT. The situation with the illegal dividends means that the payments should have been classed as wages, and this leaves us with around £14,000 in employer’s national insurance payments.

Morally, we needed to tell this story. As activists and journalists, we couldn’t start as a cooperative and begin a new chapter without telling the people who support us what we’ve discovered. We all knew what our reaction would have been if we’d found out all this about another outlet, corporate or independent, and they hadn’t come clean. It wouldn’t have been right. 

New opportunities

The debts incurred from the actions of the three former directors mean that our future and people’s livelihoods are at stake. The pressure to save 15 people’s jobs is heavy. To say that this period of time has been torturous would be accurate. None of us needed the stress and anxiety caused by three people’s wilful mismanagement and wanton greed.

Telling this story is also about telling the story of the opportunities that are now within our grasp. The toxicity and deceptiveness of the past has given way to a new style of working. It’s a collective relationship based on mutual trust. We work to our individual strengths, and we prop each other up if we start to fall down.

That said, it would be remiss to paint a picture of progressive perfection. That’s not quite the case yet. As a collective, we still have a lot of work to do in order to undo the mess we inherited. We have a lot of healing to engage in, personally and collectively, to fix the damage three people did in the past.

However, we now have 15 people who all truly give a shit about each other and the world around us. And despite the parts of this narrative that hurt, that are about a fundamental betrayal of who we thought we were as an organisation, we are proud of our workers’ revolution and our relaunch as a co-op. Moreover, we are excited about what we can achieve now we are finally embodying the values that we write about.

And with that as a bedrock, anything is possible – not least making sure that the only investigating we need do is of corporate capitalist shits outside of the Canary.

Written by Emily Apple and Steve Topple

Featured image via Unsplash/Kaikara Dharma

Support us and go ad-free

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. I’m all for people forming worker’s cooperatives and wish that there were many more of these in the UK than there currently are. However, though you obviously had genuine grievances with your former directors/editors, I can’t see that trashing them in a series of public articles serves any positive purpose whatsoever. Had you simply announced that you had become a worker’s cooperative, I’d have thought “well done and good luck” and looked forward to what would come next, hoping that you would eventually become a shining example of what can be achieved when workers work together for a common goal. I still do think that, but the fact that you’ve felt the need to enroll your supporters in what sounds to me like a series of personal grievances exacerbated by some degree of mismanagement has left me feeling like an unwilling witness to the last days of a messy and ugly divorce. Good luck to you all. I won’t be continuing on the journey with you.

    2. I am in total disagreement with the previous commentator. As a fairly long term subscriber to the Canary, always grateful for my daily dose of truth and facts dragged out from behind the MSM smokescreen, I think there’s no better way to turn over a new leaf than to bring to readers’ attention the truth behind the recent overhaul of this trusted independent journal. If you hadn’t provided this truth, I’d obviously have been blissfully unaware, but I no longer feel comfortable with blissful ignorance in this world of deceit, lies and corruption so your approach has enhanced my support because I now trust the Canary even more than I did previously to “keep it real”. All of us can behave in ways that we know aren’t according to our expressed ethos, so it’s good to bring this to light without naming and shaming, necessarily. Otherwise, we show ourselves up as hypocrites, ultimately, and arguably even worse than the Capitalists we are fighting against. So, upwards and onwards – fly high, bird of truth!

    3. I totally agree with IvorE.

      Having a company that I support be honest about everything that’s been going on behind the scenes, is so refreshing after the lies, deceit, and gaslighting we’ve all had to endure for years, from both the Tory, and Labour, parties – so seeing you turn this around, and create a true working cooperative, is wonderful!

      I’ve been following your work almost from the beginning, so your total honesty and openness is both refreshing, and something I’d expect from you all, and it helps me in my decision to keep supporting you.

      I wish you all the very best on your new journey, and hope to be kept informed, entertained, and enlightened by you all, far into the future, just as I’ve always been in the past.

      It’s wonderful to have at least one journalistic company, devoted to telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth!

    4. Think you are missing the point. The Canary has been exposed as an enterprise that was quick to dish out out holier than thou views but internally was run as cutthroat money making machine for the owners.
      There’s obviously good money to be made in virtue signalling socialism. What a sham and yet some readers still lap it up as though nothing has happened.

    5. Katy & Ivor are correct. We may not have “needed” to know any of this, but the fact that you all get a “Feeling of Release” from writing this true history reveals that you are indeed good people.

      And now you have a clean sheet to move forward.

      Quite why the poster “An Old Dog” felt the need to opine is beyond me, either Establishment mischief or an adorer of the previous Directors… likely the former.

      That no names were added to these stories both irritates and is OK – to know may make it personal, and yet it is human nature to want to know too. 😉

      I for one am very happy the Canary is continuing onwards, without these corrupt directors, whoever they were.

      Most of you may well be ‘to the left of’ me, but at least you have the distinction in British media of being honest, and that’s worth INFINITELY more than whether or not I actually agree.

      Go Canary! Stick it up to the (Wo)Man and UK Regime!

    6. Oh gosh, this is such a sad story and I am so sorry you have all been through such difficult times – pain, heartache, feelings of betrayal, bitterness, and indeed loss of earnings.
      It is also sad because it yet again shows how the lessons from past entanglements between activism and trade/business (call it what you will) have not been sufficiently distributed and understood. I was a member of an editorial collective in 1979-81, a member of a housing co-op and two workers’ co-ops. I encountered many examples of the difficult entanglement between activism and trade/business, and I know that it is often the case that good intentions and a “we’re all in this together” approach is not enough. I also feel sad for those departing directors.
      In my view some of the best lessons about workers co-operatives are not from Mondragon but from Suma – https://www.suma.coop/ and Calverts Press https://www.calverts.coop/
      I now teach social enterprise and always promote co-operatives as much as I can.
      My very best wishes and solidarity for all of you,

    7. Sounds good. Despite the heirarchy theres been good journalism here from the start. Hope you can keep it going. You will be judged on the content in the end. Just taken me 5 mins to signin and then re find this article to comment which is a glitch that has been going on a long time. All the best. Will continue to subscribe.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.