Three crises unsettling the 2026 World Cup

Less than 30 days before the 2026 World Cup kicks off, political tensions are simmering, ticket prices are soaring, and a broadcasting dispute threatening to shut out billions is brewing. The tournament—set to begin on 11 June—promises to be the biggest ever. However, it remains dogged by three major crises which continue to dominate the headlines.

Iran and Trump’s political hokey cokey

Questions continue to swirl around Iran’s participation as US president Donald Trump’s search to find off-ramps have repeatedly failed to subdue Tehran.

FIFA president Gianni Infantino has insisted there are no plans to exclude Iran from the tournament. However, conflicting statements from Trump have left audiences befuddled — will they withdraw as he has suggested or are Iranian players welcome as Trump has also previously said?

The lack of clarity has spawned speculations left, right, and centre. Trump’s associates floated the idea that Iran could be replaced by Italy. This suggestion came after Italy failed to qualify for three consecutive World Cups. Only Italy’s government had said there’s no chance of that happening, and described the suggestion “shameful.”

Back in March, the same month Trump launched unprovoked strikes on Tehran. It was reported that the Iranian consulate in Mexico had been in talks with FIFA to move Iran’s matches from the US to Mexico. Mexican president Claudia Sheinbaum signalled openness to the idea. However, FIFA rejected the plan over logistical and commercial concerns.

Meanwhile, Iran has said it will not relent, demanding guarantees over security, freedom of movement, and respect for the Iranian flag and anthem during the tournament.

Fans revolt over sky-high ticket prices

Eye-watering ticket prices are another sticking point, contradicting FIFA claims of an accessible ticketing policy for the 2026 World Cup, and sparking widespread backlash.

One such example, as reported by the Guardian, is the cost of tickets for the World Cup Final. These range from USD 8,970 to USD 11,499,998.85, as per listings on FIFA’s Resale/Exchange Marketplace — wild!

By contrast, during the 2022 World Cup hosted by Qatar, tickets for the finals retailed at USD 1,600. For this year’s tournament, premium packages for the final have reportedly climbed to nearly USD 33,000.

Infantino has defended the pricing, arguing that the US sports market already operates on inflated costs — even for college games. FIFA also says demand remains enormous. In fact, they claim more than 500 million ticket requests have already been submitted.

But many fans are being priced out. According to reports in the British press, some England supporters are already considering staying home. They are faced with paying massive travel, accommodation, and ticket costs to attend the tournament in North America.

Even Trump weighed in, saying he personally would not spend that kind of money to attend a World Cup match after prices for the US opener against Paraguay approached USD 1,000.

A broadcasting dispute could shut out billions

Another crisis is unfolding off the pitch — and it could seriously damage the tournament’s global reach.

With only weeks remaining before kickoff, FIFA still has not finalised broadcast rights agreements in either China or India. These two countries are among the world’s largest television markets.

No official broadcaster has yet been announced in China. In India, reports say FIFA rejected a joint bid worth around USD 20 million from two companies, demanding a significantly higher fee.

If no deals are reached, huge audiences across both countries could be left without access to the tournament.

Combined, China and India account for nearly three billion people — roughly a third of the global population. Losing viewers on that scale would be a major commercial and reputational blow for FIFA, especially for a tournament already billed as the most global sporting event in football history.

No matter which way you slice it, uncertainty is growing With less than a month to go, as the triple crisis shows no sign of easing.

Featured image via the Canary