• Donate
  • Login
Thursday, June 4, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

A small town police department getting an armoured military vehicle can only amplify calls to demilitarise the police

Peadar O'Cearnaigh by Peadar O'Cearnaigh
21 June 2020
in Analysis, Global
Reading Time: 4 mins read
171 3
A A
2
Home Global Analysis
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

As calls intensify in the US to demilitarise the police, the Moundsville police department in West Virginia unveiled its latest acquisition on 18 June. Under the US government’s 1033 programme, this police department obtained a ‘mine-resistant ambush-protected’ light tactical vehicle (MRAP).

What’s also noteworthy about this acquisition is that Moundsville has at times had a lower than average crime rate between 2003 and 2018. Another survey ranked it as the tenth safest city in the state. Additionally, it has an estimated population of 8,252 people. And as there is a cost to the police department for this acquisition, it could strengthen the argument to defund the police.

Protests across the US

As Black Lives Matter protests began across the US and the globe following the Minneapolis police killing of George Floyd, police used violent and militarised force against protesters. And not for the first time. There was great anger at the use of police military tactics during protests in Ferguson in 2014. The protests in Ferguson followed the police killing of Black teenager Michael Brown.

But the militarisation of the US police force is hardly new. Shane Bauer of Mother Jones reported that the US federal government supplied police departments with $5.1bn worth of equipment between 1997 and 2016. And since 2006, West Virginia has received hundreds of weapons and military equipment. It also received these weapons through the Department of Defence’s 1033 program.

Militarisation of the police and 1033

So the militarisation of the police is not a recent phenomenon. According to professor and author Alex Vitale, Robert Peel founded the police in Ireland during British occupation. Peel established this police force, according to Vitale, “to put down rural uprisings more efficiently than relying on the British Army”.

Some put the militarisation of the US police force down to the Bush administration who introduced the 1033 programme in 1990. This programme allows police forces across the US access to equipment that the military no longer needs or is surplus to requirements. According to a report to the US congress in July 2017:

Since 1991, DOD has reported transferring more than $6 billion worth of its excess controlled and noncontrolled personal property to more than 8,600 federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies through the LESO program, which is managed by DLA.

What the MRAP is meant for

This MRAP, or a variant of it, has been designed to “support the recovery efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan”. According to its manufacturer, MRAP’s are:

Lightweight armor systems made with Kevlar® fiber help optimize the essential properties needed for effective advanced ballistic protection, such as providing multi-hit protection, maintaining ballistic capability through a variety of conditions and superior durability.

We can only speculate as to what “multi-hit protection” a police force in a town of around 8,000 people actually needs. And while the Moundsville police department has reportedly acquired the MRAP ‘free of charge’, surely there are more important services the public need such as healthcare:

Ever notice that when we talk about having a healthcare system where people don’t pay at the point of service, it’s “Free stuff is irresponsible & wrong!” but when it comes to raining military equip on undertrained police across the country it’s “Hey don’t worry it’s free stuff” https://t.co/RDlEqCMHuL

— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) June 19, 2020

The Canary contacted the Moundsville police department for comment but received no reply by the time of publication.

What is policing?

Since the police killing of George Floyd, there have been growing calls to defund the police. Because his killing highlights that reform has so far failed. It also raises questions about the role of policing in the US and elsewhere. The Minneapolis police motto “To Protect With Courage, To Serve With Compassion” is beyond irony.

Because of the police force’s military beginnings in Ireland in the 19th century, the role that the modern day police force plays in the US is unfortunately not a surprise. So along with the calls to defund the police, there needs to be better understanding of its role thus far. As well as a clear understanding of the role we now, as a society, want for the police.

Featured image via Flickr – David Geitgey Sierralupe & Flickr – The U.S. Army

Tags: police
Share130Tweet81ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

Trump’s first rally in months flops as Black Lives Matter protests continue

Next Post

Doctors feeling increased levels of exhaustion, stress and concerns over NHS capacity

Next Post
Doctors feeling increased levels of exhaustion, stress and concerns over NHS capacity

Doctors feeling increased levels of exhaustion, stress and concerns over NHS capacity

UK border

Police continue to misuse Terrorism Act to harass People of Colour and political activists

Tory donor and housing secretary relationship exposed over 'controversial' property development

A mothers' group

Universal basic income would revolutionise mothers’ lives, whose unpaid work keeps society going

Keir Starmer

An academic explains exactly what is driving the media's love affair with Keir Starmer

Comments 2

  1. themagicmancunian100 says:
    6 years ago

    The “defund the police” slogan needs to be refined because the Right are using it to claim it conceals a campaign in defence of lawlessness. What it means, of course, is: don’t expect the police to solve social problems; ensure there are agencies which can intervene before the police, agencies which do not use force but provide help; restrict the police to their proper function which has to be carried out in a society in which all citizens are equal before the aw and there is respect for due process. The Right, however, are using it to mean: abolish the police and let everyone do whatever they like. The slogan needs to be simply: “equality before the law”. The argument about restricting the role of the police needs to be a matter of finesse. It’s important to think hard about the language you use. The Right has been gifted an argument: “Oh, these people on the streets, they want you to have no one to call if your house is burgled or your grandma mugged.” It’s not true, but the slogan allows them to claim it is. No one is suggesting abolishing the category of criminal behaviour. We need to make that clear. No one is suggesting there will be no police officers; simply that the police need to pulled back from their role as armed enforcers of an ingrained prejudice. The slogan has permitted the Right to shift the argument from racism to law and order. That’s a mistake. Inscribe “Equality Before the Law” on your banners. What argument do they have against that?

    Reply
  2. jessica7301 says:
    6 years ago

    Is it just me but why does the defender of the free world and democracy, that invades countries illegally, assassinates people at will and bombs civilians, actually have no interests in democracy what so ever ?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

west bank
Analysis

Israel destroys vital fruit and veg market in West Bank

by Charlie Jaay
4 June 2026
Darren Jones
Skwawkbox

Starmeroid would-be leader Darren Jones cosied up to Mandelson

by Skwawkbox
4 June 2026
Trans rights activists hold placard
Analysis

Trans code debate shows some MPs remain allies of queer community

by Alex/Rose Cocker
4 June 2026
Composite image showing author Taj Ali with book Come what may, we’re here to stay: The story of South Asian resistance in Britain over a b/w aerial photo of Luton
News

The story of South Asian resistance in the UK by Taj Ali

by The Canary
4 June 2026
Open AI CEO Sam Altman with a red line behind him
Trending

Companies abandon AI as prices skyrocket

by Willem Moore
4 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart